There may be many reasons for a person depriving themselves of an asset. A local authority should therefore consider the following before deciding whether deprivation for the purpose of avoiding care and support charges has occurred; (a) whether avoiding the care and support charge was a significant motivation in the timing of the disposal of the asset; at the point the capital was disposed of did you have a reasonable expectation of the need for care and support? (b) Did you have a reasonable expectation of needing to contribute to the cost of their eligible care needs?
For example, it would be unreasonable to decide that you had disposed of an asset in order to reduce the level of charges for your care and support needs if at the time the disposal took place you were fit and healthy and could not have foreseen the need for care and support.
Your intention to avoid your care charges must be a significant factor, or the only reason, you have dispossessed of an asset, in order to be found to have deprived yourself.
When deciding whether a deprivation has occurred the local authority should take into account:
- Whether avoiding care and support charges were a significant motivation timing of the disposal?
- When the asset was disposed of, could you have a reasonable expectation of the need for care and support?
- Did you have a reasonable expectation of needing to contribute to the cost of your eligible care needs?
We may conduct our own investigations into whether deprivation of assets has occurred, rather than relying solely on information that you provide.