Appendix F
Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy
Appendix F: Categories of Significant Harm
Type of Receptor |
Description of harm to that type of receptor that is to be regarded as significant harm |
1 Human beings |
Death, disease, serious injury, genetic mutation, birth defects or the impairment of reproductive functions For these purposes, disease is to be taken to mean an unhealthy condition of the body or a part of it and can include, for example, cancer, liver dysfunction or extensive skin ailments. Mental dysfunction is included only insofar as it is attributable to the effects of a pollutant on the body of the person concerned. The description of significant harm is referred to as a “human health effect”.
|
2 Any ecological system, or living organism forming part of such a system, within a location which is:
|
For any protected location:
In addition, in the case of a protected location which is a European Site (or a candidate Special area of Conservation or a potential Special Protection Area), harm which is incompatible with the favourable conservation status of natural habitats at that location. In determining what constitutes such harm, the local authority should have regard to the advice of English Nature and to the requirements of the Conservation (Natural Habitats etc) Regulations 1994. This description of significant harm is referred to as an “ecological system effect”. |
3 Property in the form of:
|
For crops, a substantial diminution in yield or other substantial loss in their value resulting from death, disease or other physical damage. For domestic pets, death, serious disease or serious physical damage. For other property in this category, a substantial loss in its value resulting from death, disease or other serious physical damage. The local authority should regard a substantial loss in value as occurring only when a substantial proportion of the animals or crops are dead or otherwise no longer fit for their intended purpose. Food should be regarded as being no longer fit for purpose when it fails to comply with the provisions of the Food Safety Act 1990. Where a diminution in yield or loss in value is caused by a pollutant linkage, a 20% diminution or loss should be regarded as a benchmark for what constitutes a substantial diminution or loss. This description of significant harm is referred to as an “animal or crop effect”
|
4 Property in the form of buildings: For this purpose, “building” means any structure or erection, and any part of a building including any part below ground level, but does not include plant or machinery comprised in a building. |
Structural failure, substantial damage or substantial interference with any right of occupation. For this purpose, the local authority should regard substantial damage or substantial interference as occurring when any part of the building ceases to be capable of being used for the purpose for which it is or was intended. Additionally, in the case of a scheduled Ancient Monument, substantial damage should be regarded as occurring when the damage significantly impairs the historic, architectural, traditional, artistic or archaeological interest by reason of which the monument was scheduled. This description of significant harm is referred to as a “building effect”.
|
TABLE 2: Significant Possibility of Significant Harm
1 Human health effects arising from
|
If the amount of the pollutant linkage in question:
As a result of the pathway in that linkage, would represent an unacceptable intake or direct bodily contact, assessed on the basis of relevant information on the toxicological properties of that pollutant. Such an assessment should take into account:
The question of whether an intake or exposure is unacceptable is independent of the number of people who might experience or be affected by that intake or exposure. Toxicological properties should be taken to include carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic, pathogenic, endocrine-disrupting and other similar properties.
|
2 All other human health effects (particularly by way of explosion or fire). |
If the probability, or frequency, of occurrence of significant harm of that description is unacceptable, assessed on the basis of relevant information concerning:
In making such an assessment, the local authority should take into account the levels of risk which have been judged unacceptable in other similar contexts and should give particular weight to cases where the pollutant linkage might cause significant harm which:
|
3 All ecological system effects. |
If either:
Any assessment made for these purposes should take into account relevant information for that type of pollutant linkage, particularly in relation to the ecotoxicological effects of that pollutant.
|
4 All animal and crop effects. |
If significant harm of that description is more likely than not to result from the pollutant linkage in question, taking into account relevant information for that type of pollutant linkage, particularly in relation to the ecotoxicological effects of that pollutant.
|
5 All building affects |
If significant harm of that description is more likely than not to result from the pollutant linkage in question during the expected economic life of the building (or, in the case of a scheduled Ancient Monument, the foreseeable future), taking into account relevant information for that type of pollutant linkage. |
Source: [4]
Previous Page | On to Appendix G
Back to Contents Page
Page 21 of 30