|Complaints received by subject area||Adult care services||Benefits||Children and family services||Education||Housing||Other||Planning & building control||Public finance||Transport and highways||Total|
|01/04/07 - 31/03/08||2||0||0||4||3||7||15||1||3||35|
Note: these figures will include complaints that were made prematurely to the Ombudsman and which we referred back to the authority for consideration.
|Decisions||MI reps||LS||M reps||NM reps||No mal||Omb disc||Outside jurisdiction||Premature complaints||Total excl premature||Total|
|01/04/07 - 31/03/08||3||4||0||0||9||11||3||4||30||34|
See attached notes for an explanation of the headings in this table.
|Response times||No. of First Enquiries||Avg no. of days to respond|
|01/04/07 - 31/03/08||14||32.6|
Average local authority response times 01/04/07 to 31/03/08
|Types of authority||Less than or equal to 28 days %||29 - 35 days %||More than or equal to 36 days|
|National Park Authorities||71.4||28.6||0.0|
Notes to assist interpretation of the above statistics
1. Complaints received
This information shows the number of complaints received by the LGO, broken down by service area and in total within the periods given. These figures include complaints that are made prematurely to the LGO (see below for more explanation) and that we send to the council to consider first. The figures may include some complaints that we have received but where we have not yet contacted the council.
This information records the number of decisions made by the LGO, broken down by outcome, within the periods given. This number will not be the same as the number of complaints received, because some complaints are made in one year and decided in the next. Below we set out a key explaining the outcome categories for 2007/08 complaints.
MI reps: where the LGO has concluded an investigation and issued a formal report finding maladministration causing injustice.
LS (local settlements): decisions by letter discontinuing our investigation because the authority has agreed to take some action which is considered by the Ombudsman as a satisfactory outcome for the complainant.
M reps: where the LGO has concluded an investigation and issued a formal report finding maladministration but causing no injustice to the complainant.
NM reps: where the LGO has concluded an investigation and issued a formal report finding no maladministration by the council.
No mal: decisions by letter discontinuing an investigation because we have found no, or insufficient, evidence of maladministration.
Omb disc: decisions by letter discontinuing an investigation in which we have exercised the Ombudsman’s general discretion not to pursue the complaint. This can be for a variety of reasons, but the most common is that we have found no or insufficient injustice to warrant pursuing the matter further.
Outside jurisdiction: these are cases which were outside the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction.
Premature complaints: decisions that the complaint is premature. The LGO does not normally consider a complaint unless a council has first had an opportunity to deal with that complaint itself. So if someone complains to the LGO without having taken the matter up with a council, the LGO will usually refer it to the council as a ‘premature complaint’ to see if the council can itself resolve the matter.
Total excl premature: all decisions excluding those where we referred the complaint back to the council as ‘premature’.
3. Response times
These figures record the average time the council takes to respond to our first enquiries on a complaint. We measure this in calendar days from the date we send our letter/fax/email to the date that we receive a substantive response from the council. The council’s figures may differ somewhat, since they are likely to be recorded from the date the council receives our letter until the despatch of its response.
4. Average local authority response times 2007/08
This table gives comparative figures for average response times by authorities in England, by type of authority, within three time bands.