|
LOCAL PLAN REF. NO. |
REV.
NO. |
SOURCE OF REVISION |
REVISION(S) |
|
Policy
M.1 |
M.1/A
M.1/B
M.1/C
M.1/D |
721/B38, 3202/B2
721/B38, 3202/B2
721/B38, 3202/B2
5010/B9, 5010/B80 |
The winning and working of minerals and
other forms of minerals development will be permitted where:
- there is no substitute recycled or secondary material
which can be provided at less environmental cost; and
ia) the need for mineral in relation to
the availability of alternative sources of primary,
secondary and recycled materials to the expected market is
demonstrated;
- the minerals to be extracted will be used to produce
materials which are of the greatest value nationally,
regionally and locally; and
iii) the scale and output of the
proposed development is compatible with the character of the
area and the nature of existing mineral workings within the
District;
iv) the adverse environmental effects of
the development will be contained within currently
acceptable levels; and are either acceptable or
mitigation measures can be employed;
v) soils, overburden and mineral
wastes will as far as is practicable be retained within the
site to assist progressive reclamation and to minimise the
need to import waste or other materials for this purpose;
and
vi) the site will be restored to a
condition which maintains or enhances its environ-mental
value and value to the community.
|
|
Para
C4.11 |
C4.11/A |
Editorial |
Limestone is the principal commercial
mineral worked in the plan area. Current reserves (2001)
are in the order of 430,000 tonnes of Jurassic Oolitic and
170,000 tonnes of Jurassic Lower Lias and Triassic limestones.
Limestone worked in the district is used predominantly for
building and walling purposes. |
|
Para
C4.12 |
C4.12/A |
Editorial |
Extraction of stone has taken place in the
district since Roman times. Bath Stone, the most familiar of
the various types of building stone found in B&NES
Bath & North East Somerset, is a generic name for
limestones quarried and mined from the Middle Jurassic Great
Oolite Limestone formation capping the hills in the Bath area.
Underground extraction historically was found to yield the
best quality Bath Stone, resulting in extensive mining at
Combe Down. Bath Stone is still mined at Stoke Hill Mine near
Limpley Stoke. An extensive resource of high quality Bath
Stone is believed to exist in the Great Oolite limestone
plateau forming a corridor between Limpley Stoke and the
southern boundary of the District. A variety of Bath Stone
known as Combe Down Stone is extracted at Upper Lawn Quarry.
It is considered that a sufficient resource of Combe Down
Stone exists on land surrounding the quarry to ensure a
long-term supply of materials for maintenance and
refurbishment of buildings within Bath. |
|
Para
C4.14 |
C4.14/A |
686/B121 |
Having regard particularly to the status of
Bath as a World Heritage Site, the DWLP this
Plan must make provision to ensure that a sufficient
supply of limestone is readily available to meet local demand
for building and walling stone over the plan period. |
|
Para
C4.20 |
C4.20/A |
1427/B129 |
It is considered that t he
derelict plant site should either be demolished and the land
restored to agriculture or the existing buildings refurbished
and used for a purpose which does not conflict with policies
relating to the Green Belt, development in rural areas,
highways and other planning policy considerations. |
|
Para
C4.25 |
C4.25/A |
3202/B6 |
Stowey Quarry near Bishop Sutton is a small
surface mineral working now producing "white
lias" and "blue lias" limestone’s primarily
for use as building and walling purposes
stone and also for aggregate purposes. Stone is
extracted by mechanical means. Products from the quarry are
used in construction and refurbishment of buildings within the
district and as far afield as the Royal Opera House and Dover
town Hall. The quarry covers an area of about 9ha. It is
located on the edge of the escarpment overlooking the Chew
Valley on land approximately 500m east of the Mendip Hills
Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. It is accessed from an
unclassified land off the Stowey – Clutton road. Areas of
nature conservation and archaeological importance are located
within 150, of the northern site boundary. The location of the
site and the nature of the surrounding topography means that
it is at present largely hidden from wider views. |
|
Para
C4.26 |
C4.26/A |
3202/B7 |
Historically, actual output
is estimated currently to be less than has
been 5000 tonnes each year and historically has
been considerably or less. A maximum output of
180,000 tonnes each year is permitted following review of the
1954 planning permission for stone extraction, although this
is at present the subject of an appeal. It is the current
operator’s intention that the majority of the quarry’s
production will be processed to provide raw materials for
building and construction purposes. The quarry is
estimated to have a remaining workable reserve of about
170,000 tonnes. A 3.75ha area of land adjacent to the eastern
boundary of the current working was identified as a preferred
area for extension in the MWALP. It is estimated that this
area would yield in the order of 480,000 tonnes of stone. The
void resulting both from the current site and preferred
extension area is estimated to be around 1.7 million m3. |
|
Para
C4.27 |
C4.27/A |
3202/B8 |
The MWALP proposals for Stowey Quarry were
are:
- phased mineral extraction eastwards through the
preferred area followed by backfilling with excavated and
imported wastes and the progressive reclamation of the
site for an agricultural use. Possible retention of the
lay pigeon shoot and house;
- removal of the plant and buildings and the reclamation
of the plant base as in (i).
|
|
Para
C4.30 |
C4.30/A |
Editorial |
The 1.4 Ha site is within just
outside the Bristol-Bath Green Belt and Cotswolds Area of
Outstanding Natural Beauty and is overlooked by residential
property on St Winifred’s Drive. It is located on generally
flat land. Access is via Shaft Road and St Winifred’s Drive.
Land adjacent to the south-western and south-eastern
boundaries is used as allotments. Land to the north-east is in
residential use, whilst land to the north-west comprises a
recreational area for a nearby school. Given the topography of
the area and vegetation surrounding the perimeter of the
quarry, the site is largely hidden from wider views. Output is
limited by planning condition to 5000 tonnes each year.
Planning permissions relating to the site recently were
reviewed under the Environment Act 1995 and a new schedule of
operating and restoration conditions imposed. Planning
permission was granted in 2001 for an extension to the site
which is believed will secure reserves until at least 2011. |
|
Para
C4.31 |
C4.31/A |
3202/B8 |
The MWALP proposals for Upper Lawn Quarry were
are:
- perimeter landscaping around the boundaries of the
preferred area;
- development of a new access from Shaft Road to avoid
future use of St Winifred’s Drive by vehicles serving
both the masonry works and the quarry;
- phased extraction in the preferred area followed by
backfilling with excavated wastes;
- possible retention of the masonry works following
cessation of quarrying and the use of imported stone.
|
|
Para
C4.35 |
C4.35/A |
2312/B1 |
Hayes Wood Mine produces approximately
18,000 9-11,000 tonnes of stone each year.
Planning permission for a 22.62 ha extension to the site was
granted in June 1996. Reserves of saleable minerals were
estimated at that time to be 395,850 tonnes. It is considered
that there are workable reserves at the site for at least 18
years’ production at current rates of output. |
|
Para
C4.37 |
C4.37/A |
3202/B8 |
The MWALP proposals for Hayes Wood Mines were
are:
- phased underground extraction in the Hayes Wood – Hog
Wood area by the development of Hayes Wood Mine;
- improvements to the existing surface stacking ground at
Hayes Wood Mine followed by its relocation;
- installation of new landscaped adits or shafts and
surface stacking grounds elsewhere in the preferred area
with new highway access to the A36 or B3110;
- removal of all surface installations and reclamation of
cleared areas for an agricultural/forestry use.
|
|
Para
C4.38 |
C4.38/A |
345/B30, 5001/8 |
The MWALP proposals both for the Area of
Search and the mine have been reviewed. Revised proposals are
set out at in paragraph C4.95
C4.82 below. |
|
Heading to para C4.45 |
C4.45/A |
Editorial |
CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF MINERAL
WORKING IN B&NES BATH & NORTH EAST
SOMERSET |
|
Para
C4.47
|
C4.47/A
|
3291/B2, 3202/B9 |
Stowey Quarry: whilst planning
permission for filling part of the quarry with inert wastes to
assist reclamation exists, it is desirable, having
regard to MPG7, that land used for mineral extraction is
returned to a beneficial afteruse as quickly as possible.
However, at this quarry, large heaps of waste stone
including one of about 0.4ha (overburden and
interburden) on the land surface together with a
broken and uneven an irregular quarry
floor are and little evidence of haphazard
working and minimal effective reclamation and
restoration to agriculture by backfilling quarried
waste has not been successful, even though planning permission
was also later granted to raise levels in part of the quarry
by the use of imported inert waste. It is
desirable, having regard to MPG7, that land use for mineral
extraction is returned to a beneficial afteruse as quickly as
possible. |
|
Para
C4.54 |
C4.54/A |
5001/B186, 5010/B232 |
This site has long been regarded as an
eyesore on the southern approach to Bath. The plant is set
some way back from the A367. In summer it is partially
screened by trees in leaf and is not readily visible. In
winter the derelict industrial building is more visibly
intrusive and clashes with the predominantly rural open
surrounding landscape. Land to the north-east of the plant
site requires reclamation in order to bring it back into
beneficial agricultural use. A planning application submitted
in 2000 for redevelopment of the site currently is
being considered. for offices and residential uses
was subject of a call in inquiry and is awaiting the decision
of the Secretary of State. |
|
Para
C4.60 |
C4.60/A |
3202/B12 |
Given the
economic and environmental need to conserve resources, clearly
it is essential to make best use of extracted minerals. The
MPA has no influence on the end use of minerals and mineral
products. However it can contribute to the efficient use of
minerals by seeking to ensure, for example, that high grade
minerals are not processed for low grade applications. and
that where necessary low grade materials are retained on site
for land reclamation purposes rather than being sold for use
as bulk fill in development projects. |
|
Policy M.3 |
M.3/A |
721/B39 |
Minerals development will only be permitted
where: i) minerals extracted at the site,
including where appropriate overburden and mineral wastes,
will be used to their maximum practicable efficiency in both
economic and environmental contexts. and
ii) the proposal does not involve the extraction
and/or processing of locally scarce or high grade minerals for
use in low grade applications. |
|
Para
C4.61 |
C4.61/A |
3202/B14 |
Production and use of secondary and
recycled materials is a key element in sustainable minerals
development, particularly in the case of the high volume
aggregates industry. Whilst initiatives have been slow to
gather momentum, the Landfill Tax and the forthcoming
Aggregates Levy are focussing waste management, construction
and minerals industry attention on this area. Implementation
of the EC Landfill Directive in 2001 will be an added
incentive. It is anticipated that demand for secondary and
recycled materials will increase during the Plan period.
Consequently, there will be a commensurate demand for
production facilities. This issue is recognised in the Waste
Management section of the Plan. The production of secondary
and recycled materials could result in unacceptable
environmental impacts – for example through additional
traffic movements and noise from crushing and screening plant.
The environmental benefits and disbenefits of a proposal will
therefore need to be weighed carefully. |
|
Para
C4.62 |
C4.62/A |
3202/B14 |
Production of secondary and recycled
materials is, on the face of it, to be encouraged. But it must
be borne in mind that this may not always represent the best
practicable environmental option for management of the waste
involved. Moreover, as more construction and demolition wastes
are recycled there is likely to be a greater shortfall in
availability of materials suitable for quarry reclamation and
restoration purposes. The MPA considers that in principle
it is desirable for some extracted materials to remain on
site, even if they can be marketed, it will be
necessary on non-aggregate producing mineral extraction sites
which potentially could be suitable for recycling in
order to assist with reclamation and restoration
of the site. The amount to be retained will depend
upon the circumstances at the site. The
exportation of processed or unprocessed wastes from building
and walling stone quarries or other non-aggregate sites will
therefore be resisted. |
|
Policy M.4 |
M.4/A |
5010/B10, 5010/B231 |
Development at mineral extraction sites
involving the production of secondary and/or recycled
aggregates will only be permitted where:
i) it will not involve the redevelopment
of a satisfactorily restored or satisfactorily regenerated
quarry or landfill site, or redevelopment of a colliery
spoil tip of value in respect of landscape nature
conservation and/or industrial archaeology; and
ii) the site is either close to the
source of waste and/or the market for the recycled material;
and
iii) the development will not conflict
with or unreasonably delay reclamation and restoration of
the site.
|
|
Policy M.5 |
M.5/A |
3202/B16 |
Development involving exportation of
processed or unprocessed mineral waste and/or overburden from
surface and underground mineral workings producing
building and walling stone will not be permitted
unless the materials are demonstrated to be surplus to site
reclamation and restoration requirements. |
|
Policy M.6 |
M.6/A |
721/B40 |
Planning applications for mineral
extraction involving as a primary activity the production of
crushed rock or other aggregate minerals will not be permitted
unless:
- local demand for crushed rock or other aggregates cannot
be supplied from areas with regionally - apportioned
aggregate production requirements identified in Joint
Replacement Structure Plan Policy 26; and
- the aggregate cannot be reasonably substituted
with secondary or recycled materials.
|
|
Sub-Heading to C4.67 |
C4.67/A |
120/B101, 120/B102 |
Traffic and Highways Transport |
|
Para
C4.67 |
C4.67B
C4.67/C |
120/B101, 120/B102,
5011/B1
Editorial |
Although in the past waterways have been
used to transport minerals in the Bath & North East
Somerset area, this has for some time been replaced almost
entirely by road transport. Traffic
generated by minerals amd and waste
development can have a significant impact on the environment,
on highway and highway safety and on amenity. Noise, dust,
vibration and fumes, together with traffic congestion, damage
to road surfaces and verges and potentially increased accident
risk are amongst the issues which can arise. |
|
Para
C4.68 |
C4.68/A |
120/B101, 120/B102 |
Planning applications should ensure that
the most environmentally and commercially acceptable method
of transport is employed to move minerals and that in the case
of road transport, the highway network is capable of
handling the traffic – both in terms of volume and weight
– that will be generated over the life of the proposed
development. Whilst upgrading the highway may, in some
circumstances, be a solution, prospective developers should
note that in many areas upgrading or realignment will be
unacceptable if the nature of the road is changed to the
extent that it will compromise its character or the character
of the environment and the amenities of communities through
which the road passes. |
|
Policy M.9 |
M.9/A
M.9/B |
Editorial
120/B101, 120/B102,
5011/B1 |
Applications for mineral and waste
development will only be permitted where:
- the access roads to the proposed site, including parts
of the public highway which serve such a site, are
adequate for the type and volume of traffic proposed; or
ii) the highway can be upgraded without
compromising its character and adversely affecting the
environment in the vicinity of the road and the amenities
of communities through which the road passes; and
iii) the use of the alternative methods
of transport to road are used unless it is demonstrated to
be neither commercially nor environmentally suitable.
|
|
Para
C4.75 |
C4.75/A |
3202/B20 |
Extension of the site will require a new
planning permission. Development of an intensive higher-output
operation will be unacceptable on policy grounds and could not
be justified by local, regional or national need for either
aggregates of building stone. Planning applications relating
to extension of the quarry for production of materials other
than building and walling stone at output levels at the site
will be evaluated against policies including M1, M3 and M6. |
|
Para
C4.76 |
C4.76/A |
3202/B21 |
There has been no material change in
planning circumstances since the MWALP allocation relating to
Stowey Quarry and no planning application has come forward for
extension of the site. The Preferred Area for extension of the
quarry has therefore been carried forward and is shown on the
Proposals Map. Having regard to the sensitive location
ineffectual reclamation of the quarry, it will be
necessary for appropriate reclamation of the worked out areas
to be clearly in hand before the MPA considers a planning
application for extension of working into the preferred area.
Winning and working of mineral within the preferred area
should be phased to ensure that reclamation of the site keeps
pace with extraction. Following reclamation the site should be
put to an agricultural/nature conservation afteruse. |
|
Policy M.11
PM Notation Sheet |
M.11/A |
345/B21 |
Amend Policy M.12 notation to distinguish
it more clearly from Policy M.2, M.4, M.7, M.11 notations. |
|
Para
C4.83 |
C4.83/A |
1883/B1 |
The site is shown on the proposal map and
is about 6 ha in area. A description of the site and
discussion of the need for reclamation is set out at
paragraphs C4.42 and C4.56 above. Phased reclamation of the
site utilising inert soils and subsoils to a managed nature
conservation and agricultural use is proposed. Having regard
to the rural context of the site and the desirability of minimising
local disturbance and achieving phased orderly reclamation of
the quarry complex, avoiding over-intensification
of development of the site while reclamation work
proposals for the 6 ha site will be resisted until
reclamation works on the at the nearby Queen
Charlton Concrete Works remains incomplete site
have reached an advanced stage. Any planning application
coming forward will need to demonstrate, amongst other things,
that:
- satisfactory access to and egress from the site can be
achieved;
- nature conservation and amenity interests can be
safeguarded;
- noise, dust and general disturbance can be contained
within acceptable levels having particular regard to MPG11
The Control of Noise at Surface Mineral Workings and other
relevant guidance;
- sufficient inert soils and subsoils of acceptable
quality can be obtained;
- work can be completed within a reasonable period of
time.
|