|
LOCAL PLAN REF. NO. |
REV.
NO. |
SOURCE OF REVISION |
REVISION(S) |
|
Para
C2.6 |
C2.6/A |
5001/B142 |
Landscape contributes significantly to the
identity of an area, forming the setting for day to day life,
in village, town, city and countryside. It is a resource for
recreation, a reservoir of historical evidence and an
environment for plants and animals. National guidance and the
JRSP strongly promote the recognition of the distinctiveness
of local landscape character as reflected in the local
topography, pattern of tree cover, field size, nature of
boundaries, form of settlement and building design and materials |
|
Para
C2.7 |
C2.7/A |
5001/B143 |
With its complicated geology and
topography, Bath & North East Somerset has a particularly
diverse range of landscapes. The District's rural landscapes
are described in the District's Countryside Landscape
Character Assessment and are shown in Diagram 10 ‘Rural
Landscapes of Bath & North East Somerset: A Landscape
Character Assessment’ published in April 2003. The
Assessment will provide the basis for, which forms
Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) to Policy NE.1. |
|
Para
C2.8 |
C2.8/A |
5001/B144 |
Through the Local Plan,
The Council seeks conservation and enhancement of countryside
landscape character whilst sustaining economic and
social vitality to provide for balanced communities. The
Council seeks to limit development of greenfield sites and
directs limited development to rural settlements,
concentrating on those which already act as a focus for
provision of local services. This embodies national guidance
that the countryside is an asset in its own right and building
in the open countryside, away from existing settlement, should
be strictly controlled. |
|
Para
C2.11 |
C2.11/A |
5001/B158
505/B77, 686/B99, 745/B22
|
The aim of Policy NE.1 is to retain and
where appropriate, enhance local landscape character in
both urban and rural areas. Development will need to meet
high standards of urban design, be
sensitively related to existing settlements and conserve
historic, wildlife and landscape resources. |
|
Diagram 10 |
DIAG10/A
DIAG10/B |
745/B24, 743/B30, 564/B22,
686/B97 |
- Renumber Landscape Character Area (LCA) 1
to the south-east of Bath as ‘16’. Enlarge this LCA
eastward, to correspond with Inset 31c of the Proposals Map.
- Amend Key to include LCA 9. |
|
Policy NE.1
PM District wide |
NE.1/A |
3204/B2, 745/B24, 3230/B2, 3274/B1, 3233/B19, 3236/B1,
462/B24, 581/B8 3218/B3, 3278/B1, 3099/B29, 3300/B4 |
Delete Landscape Character Area Zones from
the Proposals Map & Notation Sheet. |
|
Para
C2.14 |
C2.14/A |
581/B6, 3126/B11 |
It is inconsistent with the aims of
designation to permit major industrial and commercial
development in AONBs. Exceptions will Oonly
be made if there is proven national interest and a
lack of there are no alternative sites could
justify and exception outside the AONB, or
the need for development cannot be met in another way.
Similarly, new roads should, wherever possible, be kept away
from AONBs. Proposals for mineral workings are dealt with in
Section C.4 on Minerals. The Countryside & Rights of Way
Act 2000 confirmed that AONBs share the highest status of
protection in relation to landscape and scenic beauty. As
major development can have a serious impact on natural beauty,
applications for such proposals will be subject to rigorous
examination as set out in PPG7, para 4.5. |
|
Para
C2.15 |
C2.15/A |
Editorial change |
C2.15 The Partnership Committees for each
of the two AONBs have produced Management Plans which address
a range of issues including landscape, nature conservation,
access, heritage, visitor management, transport and community
safety. As an active supporter of both partnerships, B&NES
Bath & North East Somerset has endorsed these
Management Plans as a framework for action in the AONBs. The
Countryside Rights of Way Act 2000 has placed a new duty on
local authorities to prepare statutory management plans for
AONBs within their areas. These plans will ‘formulate the
policies of the local authority for the management of the
AONBs and the carrying out of their functions in relation to
it’. Supplementary Planning Guidance has been adopted for
considering proposals for new agricultural buildings in the
Mendip Hills (policy ET.6). |
|
Policy NE.2 |
NE.2/A
NE.2/B |
5010/B234
581/B6 |
Development which adversely affects the
natural beauty of the landscape of the designated Areas
of Outstanding Natural Beauty will not be permitted.
Major development within an AONB, or which
would affect it by virtue of proximity, will not be permitted
unless:
- an exception is justified by proven national need and;
- there
is a lack of are no alternative
options
iii there is no detrimental effect
on the character of the landscape. |
|
Policy NE.2
PM Inset 31 |
NE.2/C |
5001/B59 |
Correct error in AONB notation north west
of playing field at Lansdown, Bath. |
|
Para
C2.19 |
C2.19/A |
2649/B2 |
Similarly Radstock's location at the
convergence of five valleys contributes to its unique
character. It is surrounded and penetrated by prominent
hillsides, including those around Midsomer Norton,
which make a fundamental contribution to the town's character and
adjoining areas. |
|
Policy NE.3
PM Inset 19 |
NE.3/A |
382/B13 |
Add Important Hillside to land west of
Magdalene Road, Radstock. |
|
Policy NE.3
PM Inset 19 |
NE.3/B |
3081/B2 |
Delete Important Hillside from land at
Rosemount, Radstock. |
|
Policy NE.3
PM Inset 19b |
NE.3/C |
5001/B60 |
Add Important Hillside to land west/north
west of Meadow View. |
|
Policy NE.3
PM Inset 31 |
NE.3/D |
153/B7 |
Delete land at 173-177 Bloomfield Road,
Bath from Important Hillside designation. |
|
Para
C2.24 |
C2.24/A |
1427/B115 |
The District’s rural landscape has
suffered heavy tree loss due to Dutch Elm disease and past
agricultural practices. A second wave of Dutch Elm disease is
affecting rejuvenated Elms. Alder root disease is also a
growing problem in the District, affecting the landscape of
the river corridors and the structural integrity of the river
banks where trees are lost from the disease. |
|
Para
C2.25 |
C2.25/A |
Editorial change
|
C2.25 B&NES Bath
& North East Somerset has a duty under the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990 to ensure tree and woodland
preservation wherever it is appropriate. The Council will
continue to protect trees and woodlands through Tree
Preservation Orders (TPOs) as appropriate. There is also a
level of protection afforded to trees in Conservation Areas (CAs).
However there are many trees of value outside these
designations and careful consideration should be given to the
removal of any tree.
|
|
New Quick Guide 13A |
QG13A/A |
742/B13, 564/B21 |
Quick Guide 13A
Trees in Conservation Areas
In view of the contribution that trees can
make to the character and appearance of a Conservation Area,
the principal Act makes special provision for trees in
Conservation Areas which are not the subject of Tree
Preservation Orders. Under Section 211, subject to a few
exceptions (including trees that are dead, dying or
dangerous), anyone proposing to cut down, top or lop a tree in
a Conservation Area is required to give six weeks notice to
the Local Planning Authority. The purpose of this requirement
is to give the Authority an opportunity to consider bringing
the tree under their general control by making a Tree
Preservation Order in respect of it. Penalties for
contravention, which may include a requirement to replant, are
similar to those for Tree Preservation Orders. For guidance on
these matters, see Department of Transport, Local Government
and the Region’s leaflet ‘Protected Trees, A Guide To Tree
Preservation Orders’ (item 20). |
|
Para
C2.26 |
C2.26/A
C2.26/B |
Editorial change
574/B13, 1568/B3 |
The District’s woodland cover is less
than half of the national average. In line with the Government’s
England Forestry Strategy, B&NES Bath
& North East Somerset seeks a significant increase in
woodland cover and supports the extension of existing
woodlands and the creation of new woodlands. This may be
through appropriate planting in new development, farm
diversification or leisure provision. With new planting
schemes, good design is needed to ensure the appropriate
species and layouts are used to allow trees to grow to
maturity. Ancient woodlands are generally important for
wildlife and the Council has sought to protect this interest
under Policy NE.9. |
|
New para C2.26A |
C2.26A/A |
3298/B29 |
Some mature trees are of great antiquity
and make a particular contribution to landscape character,
local distinctiveness, biodiversity and they are often valued
cultural features with historical associations. Veteran trees
are in the ancient stage of their life, although different
species of trees tend to live for varying numbers of years;
100 years of age would be old for a birch or a willow tree. At
200 years a beech tree is middle aged, an oak would just be
maturing and a yew tree a mere youngster. Veteran trees can be
found anywhere; along old hedgerows, road junctions, river
corridors and in parkland. |
|
Policy NE.4 |
NE.4/A
NE.4/B
NE.4/C |
120/B89
3298/B29
120/B89 |
Development will only be permitted where:
- it does not have an adverse impact on trees and
woodlands of wildlife, landscape, amenity, productive
or cultural value; and
- it includes the appropriate retention and new planting
of trees and woodlands; and
iia it does not have an adverse impact on
a veteran tree;
iii in the case of an
unavoidably adverse impact on trees and woodlands of
wildlife, landscape, amenity, productive or cultural
value, compensatory provision is made.
|
|
Para
C2.28 |
C2.28/A |
Editorial change
|
The Forest area in B&NES
Bath & North East Somerset is depicted on Diagram
11 and its boundaries are shown on the Proposals Map.
Substantial planting has already taken place in the Keynsham
area and further planting is programmed. |
|
Para
C2.29 |
C2.29/A |
574/B14 |
The Forest Plan, approved by Government in
1995 (revised 2001), sets out long term objectives and
although agriculture will remain the predominant land use, t
is envisaged that eventually 30% of the Forest area will be
eventually be wooded compared with the current 5% of the former
Avon Area. |
|
Para
C2.30 |
C2.30/A |
574/B14 |
Implementation of the Forest Plan will be
partly through the development control process. Council
projects and grant aid to landowners from the Forestry Authority
Commission, Countryside Agency and others will also
assist in implementation but participation is entirely
voluntary. |
|
Para
C2.32 |
C2.32/A |
Change arising from deletion of site GDS.1/K2 |
Policy NE.5 sets out the Local Plan's
approach for developments in the forest area. The
Council is also proposing a mixed-use development scheme at
South Keynsham. This scheme will be required to reflect the
Forest of Avon objectives (see also Policy GDS1). |
|
Para
C2.34 |
C2.34/A |
1427/B116 |
Our use of land and natural resources has
always affected wildlife and their habitats. The last century
saw a huge increase in the speed and scale of human impacts
upon the natural environment and as a result there has been a
decrease of natural habitats and loss of native species.
Current information (English Nature surveys) indicates that
only 6% of the District is now covered with semi-natural
habitat. |
|
Para
C2.35 |
C2.35/A |
1427/B125 |
The past loss of wildlife habitats and
decline in the range of species is largely due to past
patterns of development and agricultural intensification. The
invasion of non-native species can also pose a threat to
biodiversity in the District. The Local Plan plays a key
role in maintaining and enhancing biodiversity through guiding
how and where development occurs. However, the Local Plan is
only one of a range of measures needed to secure effective
conservation of the resource and ensure management of change
benefits nature conservation. |
|
Quick Guide 14 |
QG14/A
QG14/B
QG14/C
QG14/D |
2263/B16
Editorial change
Editorial change
Editorial change |
Biodiversity refers simply to all
to the range of wildlife plants, animals, insects etc
and their habitats that they occupy.
Whilst in decline, there is still enormous biodiversity in B&NES
Bath & North East Somerset from bumble bees to
blackbirds, oak trees to otters.
It is biodiversity that sustains us and the
environment upon which we depend - it is essential for all our
lives in all sorts of ways. It effects affects
our health and well being, as well as the opportunities we
have for work and play. Its continued degradation will result
in the degradation of our economic, social and spiritual well
being. Biodiversity therefore affects us all.
B&NES Bath & North East
Somerset Biodiversity Action Plan 2000 |
|
Para
C2.40 |
C2.40/A
C2.40/B
C2.40/C |
3107/B1
3107/B5
Editorial change |
Combe Down and Bathampton Mines form part
of the ‘Bath and Bradford-on-Avon Bats’ candidate Special
Area of Conservation (cSAC). Compton Martin Ochre Mine is a
component site of the North Somerset and Mendip Bat cSAC. SACs
are selected to be part of a coherent European-wide network of
natural habitat types (termed Natura 2000). These bats are
protected under UK law and European Directive. The mine
complex south of Bath is known to be important as a
hibernation site for Lesser Horseshoe bats and Bechstein
bats and as both a hibernation and maternity site for
Greater Horseshoe bats. The B&NES Bath
& North East Somerset area therefore forms part of the
national stronghold for these two three
important species. |
|
New para C2.40A |
C2.40A/A |
3298/B30, 2310/B8,
1871/B2, 2648/B2,
3251/B3, 685/B28 |
The bats' feeding grounds extend roughly 4
km from the roosting and maternity sites. The Local Plan seeks
to protect the Bats' interests by defining the Bat Protection
Zones through Policy NE.7. Whilst the bat zones therefore
cover large areas, the Policy seeks only to prevent
development in those areas which would harm structures,
feeding grounds or features used by the Bats. The Policy is
therefore not overly negative in that it doesn't seek to
constrain development per se but seeks to safeguard the
interests of these rare and important bats. |
|
Para
C2.41 |
C2.41/A |
3107/B4 |
All these sites are also Sites of Special
Scientific Interest (SSSIs) under UK legislation. The
legislative controls over development affecting these sites,
primarily set out in the Conservation (Natural Habitats)
Regulations 1994, is are reflected
in Policy NE.6. Permitted Development Rights affecting these
sites are also curtailed. |
|
Policy NE.6 |
NE.6/A |
3107/B2
|
Development which would adversely affect
the integrity of potential or classified Special Protection
Areas, and designated or candidate Special Areas of
Conservation, whether directly or indirectly, will not be
permitted unless:
- there is no alternative solution; and
- there are imperative reasons of overriding public
interest; and
- compensatory provision of at least equal value is
made to preserve the overall coherence of the Natura 2000
network.
- Where such a site hosts a priority habitat or species,
as listed in the EC Habitats Directive, the development is
required for overriding reasons of human health, public
safety or there are beneficial consequences of primary
importance for the environment.
|
|
Policy NE.6
PM Inset 2 |
NE.6/B |
3107/B1, 5001/B67 |
Change ‘SI’ annotation to ‘cSAC’
annotation at Compton Martin Ochre Mine, add ‘SI’
annotation to remainder of SNCI and delete RIG annotation. |
|
Policy NE.6
PM Inset 31 |
NE.6/C |
3298/B28, 3298/B31 |
Ensure all SNCIs are annotated ‘SN’. |
|
Policy NE.6
PM Inset 31 |
NE.6/D |
5001/B68 |
Add ‘SI’ annotation to SSSIs at
Newbridge. |
|
Policy NE.7 |
NE.7/A |
685/B28, 2310/B8,
1871/B2, 2648/B2, 3299/B30, 3251/B3, 3298/B30 |
Development within the Bat Protection
Zones, as defined on the Proposals Map, that would adversely
affect structures, feeding grounds or landscape features used
by Horseshoe Bats, will not be permitted unless
compensatory provision of at least equal value is made. |
|
Policy NE.7
PM East |
NE.7/B |
5001/B72, 5001/B125 |
Amend Bat Protection Zone in Hinton
Charterhouse and St. Catherine areas. |
|
Policy NE.7
PM Central |
NE.7/C |
5001/B72, 5001/B125 |
Amend Bat Protection Zone east of Tunley
and Priston. |
|
Policy NE.7
PM West |
NE.7/D |
5001/B72, 5001/B125 |
Add Compton Martin Bat Protection Zone. |
|
Policy NE.7
PM Insets 1, 2, 3, 4, 31b, 31c, 31d, 31e,
31f, 31g, 32, 33, 34, 35 |
NE.7/E |
5001/B72 |
Add following text to Insets: ‘Entire
site lies within Bat Protection Zone (Policy NE.7)’. |
|
Policy NE.7
PM Insets 5, 8, 9 |
NE.7/F |
5001/B72, 5001/B125 |
Add Bat Protection Zone. |
|
Policy NE.7
PM Inset 31 |
NE.7/G |
5001/B172, 5001/B125 |
Amend Bat Protection Zone within and north
of Bath. |
|
Para
C2.42 |
C2.42/A |
3007/B5 |
Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs)
are designated by English Nature and are of national
importance for their flora, fauna or geological interest. They
exemplify rare and irreplaceable habitats. Within the
District, there are currently 24 SSSIs as shown on the
Proposals Map. The nature conservation interest of SSSIs
can be harmed not only as a result of development taking place
within the site itself, but also by development some distance
away. Policy NE.8 seeks to protect these sites
SSSIs from any development which harms their
nature conservation interest and English Nature has powers to
control potentially damaging operations outside the planning
system. Permitted Development Rights affecting these sites are
also curtailed. |
|
Policy NE.8 |
NE.8/A |
685/B29, 3107/B12,
3126/B13 |
Development which would adversely affect
SSSIs, either directly or indirectly, will not be permitted
unless;
- there are imperative reasons of national importance for
the development; and
- compensatory provision of at least equal value is
made.
|
|
Policy NE.8
PM District wide |
NE.8/B |
3298/B28, 3298/B31 |
Ensure all SSSIs are annotated ‘SI’. |
|
Para
C2.43 |
C2.43/A |
Editorial change |
PPG9 on nature conservation stresses the
importance of protecting locally as well as nationally
designated sites of nature conservation importance.
Semi-natural habitats in B&NES the
District, whilst being limited……. |
|
Quick Guide 15 |
QG15/A |
3298/B4 |
1. Scientific Characteristics -
Naturalness, size, diversity, rarity, fragility,
irreplaceability, representativeness, location, important and
key species and habitats, age/continuity.
2. Community/Amenity
Community value, physical access, visual
access, education, landscape/aesthetic, situated in area
lacking natural habitats, recorded history, species &
Habitats Conservation
Source :BRERC Natural
Assets in Avon 1995 |
|
Policy NE.9 |
NE.9/A |
455/B12, 3107/B11, 3126/B14 & Council initiated change
to improve clarity |
Development which would adversely affect,
either directly or indirectly, Sites of Nature Conservation
Importance, Local Nature Reserves or Regionally Important
Geological Sites, as shown on the Proposals Map, or any other
sites or equivalent nature conservation value, will not be
permitted unless;
- material factors are sufficient to override the local biological
and community/amenity value of the site; and
- compensatory provision of at least equal value is
made.
|
|
Policy NE.9
PM
District wide |
NE.9/B |
3298/B28, 3298/B31
|
Ensure all SPAs are annotated ‘SPA’ and
SACs, annotated ‘SAC’ (or cSACs for candidate sites). |
|
Policy NE.9
PM Inset 6 |
NE.9/C |
2448/B8 |
Add ‘SI’ annotation to Winford Brook,
west of Chew Magna. |
|
Policy NE.9
PM Inset 19, 19b |
NE.9/D |
3081/B3 |
Delete SNCI at Rosemount, Radstock. |
|
Policy NE.9
PM Inset 23 |
NE.9/E |
502/B18 |
Change Old Pit Batch SNCI annotation from
‘RIG’ to ‘SN’. |
|
Policy |
NE.9/F |
153/B6 |
Delete land at 177 Bloomfield Road, Bath
from ‘SNCI’. |
|
NE.9 |
NE.9/G |
2915/B3 |
Delete ‘SNCI’ at Bathford Paper Mill
car park. |
|
PM Inset |
NE.9/H |
2965/B5 |
Delete ‘SNCI’ notation from New Bridge
at Newbridge. |
|
31 |
NE.9/I |
2965/B5 |
Delete ‘SNCI’ notation from Midland
Bridge, Bath. |
| |
NE.9/J |
2965/B5 |
Delete ‘SNCI’ notation from Windsor
bridge, Bath |
| |
NE.9/K |
2965/B5 |
Delete ‘SNCI’ notation from Cleveland
Bridge, Bath. |
| |
NE.9/L |
2965/B5 |
Ensure River Avon SNCI is annotated as ‘SN’ |
| |
NE.9/M |
5001/B162 |
Add previously omitted ‘SNCI’ at
Bathampton Down. |
| |
NE.9/N |
5001/B56 |
Add ‘SN’ annotation to ‘SNCI’ west
of Sydney Buildings, Bath. |
| |
NE.9/O |
5001/B57 |
Add ‘SN’ annotation to ‘SNCI’ at
Lymore Recreation Ground, Bath. |
| |
NE.9/P |
5001/B78 |
Add ‘SN’ annotation to ‘SNCI’ at
Recreation Ground adjacent to Bramble Way/Firs Field, North
Road, Bath. |
| |
NE.9/Q |
3305/B4 |
Delete ‘SNCI’ notation at Old Fosse
Road, Bath. |
| |
NE.9/R |
447/B38 |
Annotate land at Wellsway as ‘SNCI’ and
not as a ‘RIG’. |
| |
NE.9/S |
580/B8 |
Add ‘SN’ annotation along the Wansdyke
‘SNCI’, Odd Down. |
|
Policy |
NE.9/T |
2965/B5 |
Delete ‘SNCI’ notation from Churchill
Bridge, Bath. |
|
NE.9
PM Inset 31a |
NE.9/U |
2965/B5 |
Delete ‘SNCI’ notation from A46 and
railway bridge, Batheaston. |
|
Policy NE.9
PM Inset 31c |
NE.9/V |
580/B9 |
Reduce the width of the ‘SNCI’
designation on the Wansdyke at Odd Down along its southern
edge. |
|
Title to C2.48 |
C2.48/A |
683/B12 |
Locally Important Species and their Habitats |
|
New Quick Guide 15A |
QG15A/A |
745/B21, 3298/B35 |
Quick Guide 15A
Priority Species and Habitats for Bath &
North East Somerset
Habitats
1. Habitats for which there is a national
Biodiversity Action Plan
2. Habitats of local ecological and
cultural significance
3. Habitats listed in Annex 1 of the
Habitats Directive
Species
1. UK BAP species with national
Biodiversity Action Plans
2. Species listed in official UK Red Data
Books
3. Nationally scarce/nationally notable
species
4. European Protected Species as listed
in the European Habitats Directive
5. Species which are known to be present
in nationally or internationally important numbers (as
defined by recognised national data bases e.g. WEBS).
6. Species which expert opinion suggests
that Bath and North East Somerset is of particular
importance in a national or regional context
7. Species that are rare in Avon
according to the BRERC area status for that species group
8. Species which are present in 3 or
fewer sites in Bath & North East Somerset.
9. Species where there is evidence of
significant population decline locally
10. Species that if conserved will
deliver significant conservation benefit for species or
habitats that are on the list (so-called keystone or
indicator species).
|
|
Policy NE.11 |
NE.11/A
NE.11/B |
Editorial change
3126/B9 |
Development which would adversely affect a
species of importance to B&NES Bath
& North East Somerset or the habitat of such species,
directly or indirectly, will not be permitted unless the
importance of the development and its need for that particular
location is sufficient to override the local value of the
species, or compensatory provision of at least equivalent
value is made. |
|
Policy NE.12 |
NE.12/A
NE.12/B
NE.12/C
NE.12/D |
455/B13, 455/B20,
5001/B82
1427/B121, 3298/B24
3107/B13 |
Development will only be permitted where
it;
- retains features of the landscape such as trees, copses,
woodlands, grasslands, batches, ponds, roadside verges,
veteran trees, hedgerows, walls, orchards and
watercourses and their corridors if they are of
amenity, wildlife or landscape value or if they
contribute to a wider network of habitats;
- provides, where appropriate, for the creation of new
features and habitats; and
- makes appropriate provision for the management of such
features and habitats where they are of major importance
for wild flora and fauna.
Where the loss of such features is
unavoidable because the reasons for the development outweigh
the need to retain the features, compensatory provision of
at least equal value will be required. |
|
Para
C2.56 |
C2.56/A |
1427/B127, 120/B82, 2695/B3 |
Within the District, there are
the Environment Agency has identified a number of
groundwater source protection areas and these are shown on the
Proposals Map. These are concentrated in the Chew Valley and
the northern edge of the Mendip Hills and in areas north and
south of Bath. In order to protect public water supplies
and Development proposals in these areas need to
be strictly controlled to prevent pollution which is
extremely difficult, if not impossible, to clean up, it is
important that development proposals affecting identified
groundwater catchment areas and any others within the
District, need to be strictly controlled. |
|
New para C2.56A |
C2.56A/A |
1427/B126
|
Consideration should be given to any
possible impact on groundwater recharge, flows and levels. If
it is anticipated that works may penetrate the natural winter
water table then the impact of such works will need to be
assessed and discussed with the Environment Agency. If
detrimental consequences of the water environment are likely,
agreed mitigation measure will be necessary. |
|
Policy NE.13 |
NE.13/A |
1427/B127, 120/B82,
2695/B3 |
Development within the groundwater source
protection areas shown on the Proposals Map, or any other
groundwater catchment area, will not be permitted where it
has an adverse impact on the quality of groundwater resource
in terms of pollution and derogation of the resource. |
|
Policy NE.13
PM
Insets 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 |
NE.13/B |
5001/b73 |
Add following text to Insets: ‘Entire
site lies within Water Source Protection Area (Policy NE.13)’. |
|
New heading & paras C2.56B to C2.56D |
C2.56B/A
C2.56C/A
C2.56D/A |
2695/B1, 2695/B2,
5019/B7 (all changes) |
Bath Hot Springs
C2.56B Since Roman times with the
development of ‘Aquae Sulis’ as a retreat for health
therapy, worship and relaxation, Bath’s Hot Springs have
been the centre of social, economic and cultural developments
in Bath. Settlement grew up around this resource which has
culminated in the modern City of Bath. The Springs now attract
many visitors annually. The thermal waters will once again be
used for bathing with the opening of the Bath Spa in a complex
that will combine historic buildings with a new
state-of-the-art leisure spa.
C2.56C There are three Hot Springs in the
centre of Bath: the Kings Springs within the Roman Bath
complex, the Cross Bath Spring, and the Hetling Spring in Hot
Bath Street. Together they produce around 1.3 million litres
of mineral-rich thermal water per day with a temperature of
between 41 and 46° C. These
thermal waters arise from the Carboniferous Limestone via
fissures in the overlying layers (a layer of alluvium,
successive layers of Lias Clay and limestone and Triassic
Mercia mudstone) and appear as springs on the surface.
C2.56D The Council is responsible for the
protection of the Hot Springs in Bath. This duty was entrusted
to the Civic Authority in the Charter of Incorporation of the
City of Bath 1590 by Elizabeth I who decreed that the thermal
waters should be available for public use in perpetuity. The
Springs are protected by Section 33 of the County of Avon Act
1982 which specifies three control zones within which the
depths of excavations is controlled. Policy NE.13A, however,
seeks to ensure that both the quality and quantity of the
groundwater source is protected from development that is
likely to have an adverse effect on this resource within the
Protection area as defined on the Proposals Map. This boundary
corresponds with the outer control zone as defined under the
Avon Act. The Environment Agency will also be consulted on
applications which are likely to have an impact on the Hot
Springs. |
|
New Policy NE.13A |
NE.13A/A |
2695/B1, 2695/B2,
5019/B7 |
Development within the Bath Hot Springs
Protection Area, as shown on the Proposals Map, that has an
adverse impact on the quality or yield of the Bath Hot
Springs, will not be permitted. |
|
New Policy NE.13A
PM Inset 31 |
NE.13A/B |
2695/B1, 2695/B2,
5019/B7 |
Add Bath Hot Springs Protection
designation. |
|
New Policy NE.13A
PM Inset 31a, 31f |
NE.13A/C |
2695/B1, 2695/B2,
5019/B7 |
Add following text to Insets 31a & 31f:
‘Entire Inset lies within the Bath Hot Springs Protection
Area (Policy NE.13A)’. |
|
New Policy NE.13A
Notation Sheet |
NE.13A/D |
2695/B1, 2695/B2,
5019/B7 |
Add new notation for Bath Hot Springs
Protection Area. |
|
New para C2.58A |
NE.13A/E |
1427/B123 |
PPG25 (Development & Flood Risk) sets
out a sequential test in the allocation of land for
development and the consideration of development proposals.
Table 1 of the PPG defines fluvial Flood Risk zones and
advises on the nature of development appropriate in each zone. |
|
Policy NE.14 |
NE.14/A
NE.14/B |
3007/B3, 3318/B2,
3004/B3, 3004/B1,
3004/B5, 723/B32,
2368/B3 |
Development will not be permitted where:
- it is subject to
at risk from
flooding, causes flooding elsewhere or where it
would impede the flow of floodwater including
areas identified on the Proposals Map unless
the flood hazard can be mitigated;
- it is in a floodplain, including those identified on the
Proposals Map, unless the flood hazard can be mitigated,
it is not subject to flooding or does not cause flooding
elsewhere;
- it causes net loss in the flood storage capacity;
- the run-off from the development would result in, or
increase the risk of, flooding of watercourses, ditches,
land or property;
- it would prevent the maintenance of the channels of
watercourses; it would result in watercourse channel
instability; or
- the existing drainage systems on the site are adversely
affected, or if the land drainage of the site, when
developed, is inadequate.
|
|
Policy NE.14
PM Central |
NE.14/C |
685/B37 |
Amend Avon Valley floodplain to show
updated information and correct errors. |
|
Policy NE.14
PM Inset 19 |
NE.14/D |
5001/B58 |
Add floodplain notation at River Somer west
of Wheelers Road. |
|
Policy NE.14
PM Inset 31 |
NE.14/E |
685/B31, 5018/B1 |
Amend floodplain notation to show updated
information and to correct errors in the Newbridge area,
western Bath, eastern Bath and the Batheaston area. |
|
Policy NE.14
PM Inset 31a |
NE.14/F |
685/B31, 5018/B1 |
Amend floodplain notation to show updated
information and to correct errors. |
|
Policy NE.14
PM Inset 31f |
NE.14/G |
685/B31, 5014/B1 |
Amend floodplain in southern part of
Batheaston village. |
|
Policy NE.14
PM Notation Sheet |
NE.14/H |
685/B31 |
Delete Protected Floodplain Notation. |
|
Diagram 12 |
DIAG12/A |
685/B31 |
Show updated floodplain boundaries in the
Bath area. |
|
Para
C2.61 |
C2.61/A
C2.61/B |
Editorial
1427/B124 |
As described in para C2.49, the Districts’
District’s rivers, canals and other watercourses make
an important contribution to the character of the countryside
and urban areas and are often of great wildlife importance
and interest, including increasingly rare
water-dependent habitats. They are also often associated with
an increasing assemblage of historical and cultural features. |
|
Para
C2.63 |
C2.63/A |
3298/B25 |
Applications for development in the
vicinity of the affecting a waterway will be
assessed to ensure that the proposed use of land or buildings
is appropriate and whether opportunities for enhancing the
amenities of the waterways have been fully recognised. This
includes, for example, improvements to the tree cover which
contribute to the overall landscape, extensions to riverside
footpaths, or the enhancement of wildlife habitat. |
|
Policy NE.15 |
NE.15/A |
685/B32 |
Development will only be permitted where it
conserves or enhances the character, amenity or wildlife value
of watercourses and their corridors. |
|
Policy NE.16 |
NE.16/A |
721/B36 |
Development which would result in the loss
of the best and most versatile agricultural land (Grades 1, 2
and 3a based upon the DEFRA land classification) will not be
permitted unless:
- the need for the development at that location is
sufficient to override the need to protect the
agricultural value of the land; or
- other sustainability considerations on available lower
grade land outweigh the need to protect the agricultural
value of the land; or
- agricultural practices carried out on available lower
grade land contribute in a special way to the quality of
the environment or local economy.
Where there is a choice of sites on land in
Grades 3b-5, development should be directed towards land of
the least grade, except where sustainability considerations
suggest otherwise. |