Bath and North East Somerset

 Archive

Online services and information for you
 Home | Archive Introduction | Related Local Plan Information
Links

 

B&NES Local Plan Revised Deposit - contents

Contents Page

 

 

Local Plan - List of Revisions

BATH & NORTH EAST SOMERSET LOCAL PLAN

INCLUDING MINERALS & WASTE POLICIES

REVISED DEPOSIT DRAFT 2003

List of Revisions to the Local Plan

CHAPTER C2: THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT


LOCAL PLAN REF. NO.

REV.

NO.

SOURCE OF REVISION

REVISION(S)

Para

C2.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

C2.6/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

5001/B142

Landscape contributes significantly to the identity of an area, forming the setting for day to day life, in village, town, city and countryside. It is a resource for recreation, a reservoir of historical evidence and an environment for plants and animals. National guidance and the JRSP strongly promote the recognition of the distinctiveness of local landscape character as reflected in the local topography, pattern of tree cover, field size, nature of boundaries, form of settlement and building design and materials

Para

C2.7

 

 

C2.7/A

 

 

5001/B143

With its complicated geology and topography, Bath & North East Somerset has a particularly diverse range of landscapes. The District's rural landscapes are described in the District's Countryside Landscape Character Assessment and are shown in Diagram 10 ‘Rural Landscapes of Bath & North East Somerset: A Landscape Character Assessment’ published in April 2003. The Assessment will provide the basis for, which forms Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) to Policy NE.1.

Para

C2.8

C2.8/A

5001/B144

Through the Local Plan, The Council seeks conservation and enhancement of countryside landscape character whilst sustaining economic and social vitality to provide for balanced communities. The Council seeks to limit development of greenfield sites and directs limited development to rural settlements, concentrating on those which already act as a focus for provision of local services. This embodies national guidance that the countryside is an asset in its own right and building in the open countryside, away from existing settlement, should be strictly controlled.

Para

C2.11

 

C2.11/A

5001/B158

505/B77, 686/B99, 745/B22

The aim of Policy NE.1 is to retain and where appropriate, enhance local landscape character in both urban and rural areas. Development will need to meet high standards of urban design, be sensitively related to existing settlements and conserve historic, wildlife and landscape resources.

Diagram 10

DIAG10/A

 

DIAG10/B

745/B24, 743/B30, 564/B22,

686/B97

- Renumber Landscape Character Area (LCA) 1 to the south-east of Bath as ‘16’. Enlarge this LCA eastward, to correspond with Inset 31c of the Proposals Map.

- Amend Key to include LCA 9.

Policy NE.1

PM District wide

NE.1/A

3204/B2, 745/B24, 3230/B2, 3274/B1, 3233/B19, 3236/B1, 462/B24, 581/B8 3218/B3, 3278/B1, 3099/B29, 3300/B4

Delete Landscape Character Area Zones from the Proposals Map & Notation Sheet.

Para

C2.14

 

C2.14/A

 

581/B6, 3126/B11

It is inconsistent with the aims of designation to permit major industrial and commercial development in AONBs. Exceptions will Oonly be made if there is proven national interest and a lack of there are no alternative sites could justify and exception outside the AONB, or the need for development cannot be met in another way. Similarly, new roads should, wherever possible, be kept away from AONBs. Proposals for mineral workings are dealt with in Section C.4 on Minerals. The Countryside & Rights of Way Act 2000 confirmed that AONBs share the highest status of protection in relation to landscape and scenic beauty. As major development can have a serious impact on natural beauty, applications for such proposals will be subject to rigorous examination as set out in PPG7, para 4.5.

Para

C2.15

 

 

 

 

C2.15/A

 

 

 

 

Editorial change

C2.15 The Partnership Committees for each of the two AONBs have produced Management Plans which address a range of issues including landscape, nature conservation, access, heritage, visitor management, transport and community safety. As an active supporter of both partnerships, B&NES Bath & North East Somerset has endorsed these Management Plans as a framework for action in the AONBs. The Countryside Rights of Way Act 2000 has placed a new duty on local authorities to prepare statutory management plans for AONBs within their areas. These plans will ‘formulate the policies of the local authority for the management of the AONBs and the carrying out of their functions in relation to it’. Supplementary Planning Guidance has been adopted for considering proposals for new agricultural buildings in the Mendip Hills (policy ET.6).

Policy NE.2

NE.2/A

 

 

 

 

 

NE.2/B

5010/B234

 

 

 

 

 

581/B6

Development which adversely affects the natural beauty of the landscape of the designated Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty will not be permitted.

 

Major development within an AONB, or which would affect it by virtue of proximity, will not be permitted unless:

  1. an exception is justified by proven national need and;
  2. there is a lack of are no alternative options

iii there is no detrimental effect on the character of the landscape.

Policy NE.2

PM Inset 31

NE.2/C

5001/B59

Correct error in AONB notation north west of playing field at Lansdown, Bath.

Para

C2.19

 

 

C2.19/A

 

 

2649/B2

Similarly Radstock's location at the convergence of five valleys contributes to its unique character. It is surrounded and penetrated by prominent hillsides, including those around Midsomer Norton, which make a fundamental contribution to the town's character and adjoining areas.

Policy NE.3

PM Inset 19

NE.3/A

382/B13

Add Important Hillside to land west of Magdalene Road, Radstock.

Policy NE.3

PM Inset 19

NE.3/B

3081/B2

Delete Important Hillside from land at Rosemount, Radstock.

Policy NE.3

PM Inset 19b

NE.3/C

5001/B60

Add Important Hillside to land west/north west of Meadow View.

Policy NE.3

PM Inset 31

NE.3/D

153/B7

Delete land at 173-177 Bloomfield Road, Bath from Important Hillside designation.

Para

C2.24

 

 

C2.24/A

 

 

1427/B115

The District’s rural landscape has suffered heavy tree loss due to Dutch Elm disease and past agricultural practices. A second wave of Dutch Elm disease is affecting rejuvenated Elms. Alder root disease is also a growing problem in the District, affecting the landscape of the river corridors and the structural integrity of the river banks where trees are lost from the disease.

Para

C2.25

C2.25/A

Editorial change

 

 

C2.25 B&NES Bath & North East Somerset has a duty under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to ensure tree and woodland preservation wherever it is appropriate. The Council will continue to protect trees and woodlands through Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs) as appropriate. There is also a level of protection afforded to trees in Conservation Areas (CAs). However there are many trees of value outside these designations and careful consideration should be given to the removal of any tree.

 

 

New Quick Guide 13A

QG13A/A

742/B13, 564/B21

Quick Guide 13A

 

Trees in Conservation Areas

 

In view of the contribution that trees can make to the character and appearance of a Conservation Area, the principal Act makes special provision for trees in Conservation Areas which are not the subject of Tree Preservation Orders. Under Section 211, subject to a few exceptions (including trees that are dead, dying or dangerous), anyone proposing to cut down, top or lop a tree in a Conservation Area is required to give six weeks notice to the Local Planning Authority. The purpose of this requirement is to give the Authority an opportunity to consider bringing the tree under their general control by making a Tree Preservation Order in respect of it. Penalties for contravention, which may include a requirement to replant, are similar to those for Tree Preservation Orders. For guidance on these matters, see Department of Transport, Local Government and the Region’s leaflet ‘Protected Trees, A Guide To Tree Preservation Orders’ (item 20).

Para

C2.26

 

C2.26/A

 

 

 

 

 

C2.26/B

 

Editorial change

 

 

 

 

 

574/B13, 1568/B3

The District’s woodland cover is less than half of the national average. In line with the Government’s England Forestry Strategy, B&NES Bath & North East Somerset seeks a significant increase in woodland cover and supports the extension of existing woodlands and the creation of new woodlands. This may be through appropriate planting in new development, farm diversification or leisure provision. With new planting schemes, good design is needed to ensure the appropriate species and layouts are used to allow trees to grow to maturity. Ancient woodlands are generally important for wildlife and the Council has sought to protect this interest under Policy NE.9.

New para C2.26A

C2.26A/A

3298/B29

Some mature trees are of great antiquity and make a particular contribution to landscape character, local distinctiveness, biodiversity and they are often valued cultural features with historical associations. Veteran trees are in the ancient stage of their life, although different species of trees tend to live for varying numbers of years; 100 years of age would be old for a birch or a willow tree. At 200 years a beech tree is middle aged, an oak would just be maturing and a yew tree a mere youngster. Veteran trees can be found anywhere; along old hedgerows, road junctions, river corridors and in parkland.

Policy NE.4

 

 

NE.4/A

 

 

NE.4/B

 

NE.4/C

 

 

120/B89

 

 

3298/B29

 

120/B89

Development will only be permitted where:

  1. it does not have an adverse impact on trees and woodlands of wildlife, landscape, amenity, productive or cultural value; and
  2. it includes the appropriate retention and new planting of trees and woodlands; and

iia it does not have an adverse impact on a veteran tree;

iii in the case of an unavoidably adverse impact on trees and woodlands of wildlife, landscape, amenity, productive or cultural value, compensatory provision is made.

Para

C2.28

C2.28/A

Editorial change

 

 

The Forest area in B&NES Bath & North East Somerset is depicted on Diagram 11 and its boundaries are shown on the Proposals Map. Substantial planting has already taken place in the Keynsham area and further planting is programmed.

Para

C2.29

 

 

 

C2.29/A

 

 

 

574/B14

The Forest Plan, approved by Government in 1995 (revised 2001), sets out long term objectives and although agriculture will remain the predominant land use, t is envisaged that eventually 30% of the Forest area will be eventually be wooded compared with the current 5% of the former Avon Area.

Para

C2.30

 

 

C2.30/A

 

 

574/B14

Implementation of the Forest Plan will be partly through the development control process. Council projects and grant aid to landowners from the Forestry Authority Commission, Countryside Agency and others will also assist in implementation but participation is entirely voluntary.

Para

C2.32

 

C2.32/A

Change arising from deletion of site GDS.1/K2

Policy NE.5 sets out the Local Plan's approach for developments in the forest area. The Council is also proposing a mixed-use development scheme at South Keynsham. This scheme will be required to reflect the Forest of Avon objectives (see also Policy GDS1).

Para

C2.34

 

 

 

C2.34/A

 

 

 

1427/B116

Our use of land and natural resources has always affected wildlife and their habitats. The last century saw a huge increase in the speed and scale of human impacts upon the natural environment and as a result there has been a decrease of natural habitats and loss of native species. Current information (English Nature surveys) indicates that only 6% of the District is now covered with semi-natural habitat.

Para

C2.35

 

C2.35/A

 

1427/B125

The past loss of wildlife habitats and decline in the range of species is largely due to past patterns of development and agricultural intensification. The invasion of non-native species can also pose a threat to biodiversity in the District. The Local Plan plays a key role in maintaining and enhancing biodiversity through guiding how and where development occurs. However, the Local Plan is only one of a range of measures needed to secure effective conservation of the resource and ensure management of change benefits nature conservation.

Quick Guide 14

QG14/A

 

QG14/B

 

 

QG14/C

 

 

 

 

 

QG14/D

2263/B16

 

Editorial change

 

 

Editorial change

 

 

 

 

 

Editorial change

Biodiversity refers simply to all to the range of wildlife plants, animals, insects etc and their habitats that they occupy. Whilst in decline, there is still enormous biodiversity in B&NES Bath & North East Somerset from bumble bees to blackbirds, oak trees to otters.

 

It is biodiversity that sustains us and the environment upon which we depend - it is essential for all our lives in all sorts of ways. It effects affects our health and well being, as well as the opportunities we have for work and play. Its continued degradation will result in the degradation of our economic, social and spiritual well being. Biodiversity therefore affects us all.

 

B&NES Bath & North East Somerset Biodiversity Action Plan 2000

Para

C2.40

 

C2.40/A

 

 

 

 

 

C2.40/B

C2.40/C

 

3107/B1

 

 

 

 

 

3107/B5

Editorial change

Combe Down and Bathampton Mines form part of the ‘Bath and Bradford-on-Avon Bats’ candidate Special Area of Conservation (cSAC). Compton Martin Ochre Mine is a component site of the North Somerset and Mendip Bat cSAC. SACs are selected to be part of a coherent European-wide network of natural habitat types (termed Natura 2000). These bats are protected under UK law and European Directive. The mine complex south of Bath is known to be important as a hibernation site for Lesser Horseshoe bats and Bechstein bats and as both a hibernation and maternity site for Greater Horseshoe bats. The B&NES Bath & North East Somerset area therefore forms part of the national stronghold for these two three important species.

New para C2.40A

C2.40A/A

3298/B30, 2310/B8,

1871/B2, 2648/B2,

3251/B3, 685/B28

The bats' feeding grounds extend roughly 4 km from the roosting and maternity sites. The Local Plan seeks to protect the Bats' interests by defining the Bat Protection Zones through Policy NE.7. Whilst the bat zones therefore cover large areas, the Policy seeks only to prevent development in those areas which would harm structures, feeding grounds or features used by the Bats. The Policy is therefore not overly negative in that it doesn't seek to constrain development per se but seeks to safeguard the interests of these rare and important bats.

Para

C2.41

 

 

C2.41/A

 

 

3107/B4

All these sites are also Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) under UK legislation. The legislative controls over development affecting these sites, primarily set out in the Conservation (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1994, is are reflected in Policy NE.6. Permitted Development Rights affecting these sites are also curtailed.

Policy NE.6

 

 

 

 

 

NE.6/A

 

 

 

 

 

3107/B2

Development which would adversely affect the integrity of potential or classified Special Protection Areas, and designated or candidate Special Areas of Conservation, whether directly or indirectly, will not be permitted unless:

  1. there is no alternative solution; and
  2. there are imperative reasons of overriding public interest; and
  3. compensatory provision of at least equal value is made to preserve the overall coherence of the Natura 2000 network.
  4. Where such a site hosts a priority habitat or species, as listed in the EC Habitats Directive, the development is required for overriding reasons of human health, public safety or there are beneficial consequences of primary importance for the environment.

Policy NE.6

PM Inset 2

NE.6/B

3107/B1, 5001/B67

Change ‘SI’ annotation to ‘cSAC’ annotation at Compton Martin Ochre Mine, add ‘SI’ annotation to remainder of SNCI and delete RIG annotation.

Policy NE.6

PM Inset 31

NE.6/C

3298/B28, 3298/B31

Ensure all SNCIs are annotated ‘SN’.

Policy NE.6

PM Inset 31

NE.6/D

5001/B68

Add ‘SI’ annotation to SSSIs at Newbridge.

Policy NE.7

 

 

NE.7/A

 

685/B28, 2310/B8,

1871/B2, 2648/B2, 3299/B30, 3251/B3, 3298/B30

Development within the Bat Protection Zones, as defined on the Proposals Map, that would adversely affect structures, feeding grounds or landscape features used by Horseshoe Bats, will not be permitted unless compensatory provision of at least equal value is made.

Policy NE.7

PM East

NE.7/B

5001/B72, 5001/B125

Amend Bat Protection Zone in Hinton Charterhouse and St. Catherine areas.

Policy NE.7

PM Central

NE.7/C

5001/B72, 5001/B125

Amend Bat Protection Zone east of Tunley and Priston.

Policy NE.7

PM West

NE.7/D

5001/B72, 5001/B125

Add Compton Martin Bat Protection Zone.

Policy NE.7

PM Insets 1, 2, 3, 4, 31b, 31c, 31d, 31e, 31f, 31g, 32, 33, 34, 35

NE.7/E

5001/B72

Add following text to Insets: ‘Entire site lies within Bat Protection Zone (Policy NE.7)’.

Policy NE.7

PM Insets 5, 8, 9

NE.7/F

5001/B72, 5001/B125

Add Bat Protection Zone.

Policy NE.7

PM Inset 31

NE.7/G

5001/B172, 5001/B125

Amend Bat Protection Zone within and north of Bath.

Para

C2.42

 

 

C2.42/A

 

 

 

3007/B5

Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) are designated by English Nature and are of national importance for their flora, fauna or geological interest. They exemplify rare and irreplaceable habitats. Within the District, there are currently 24 SSSIs as shown on the Proposals Map. The nature conservation interest of SSSIs can be harmed not only as a result of development taking place within the site itself, but also by development some distance away. Policy NE.8 seeks to protect these sites SSSIs from any development which harms their nature conservation interest and English Nature has powers to control potentially damaging operations outside the planning system. Permitted Development Rights affecting these sites are also curtailed.

Policy NE.8

 

 

 

 

NE.8/A

 

 

 

 

685/B29, 3107/B12,

3126/B13

Development which would adversely affect SSSIs, either directly or indirectly, will not be permitted unless;

  1. there are imperative reasons of national importance for the development; and
  2. compensatory provision of at least equal value is made.

Policy NE.8

PM District wide

NE.8/B

3298/B28, 3298/B31

Ensure all SSSIs are annotated ‘SI’.

Para

C2.43

C2.43/A

Editorial change

PPG9 on nature conservation stresses the importance of protecting locally as well as nationally designated sites of nature conservation importance. Semi-natural habitats in B&NES the District, whilst being limited…….

Quick Guide 15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

QG15/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3298/B4

1. Scientific Characteristics - Naturalness, size, diversity, rarity, fragility, irreplaceability, representativeness, location, important and key species and habitats, age/continuity.

 

2. Community/Amenity

Community value, physical access, visual access, education, landscape/aesthetic, situated in area lacking natural habitats, recorded history, species & Habitats Conservation

 

Source :BRERC Natural Assets in Avon 1995

Policy NE.9

 

 

 

 

NE.9/A

 

 

 

455/B12, 3107/B11, 3126/B14 & Council initiated change to improve clarity

Development which would adversely affect, either directly or indirectly, Sites of Nature Conservation Importance, Local Nature Reserves or Regionally Important Geological Sites, as shown on the Proposals Map, or any other sites or equivalent nature conservation value, will not be permitted unless;

  1. material factors are sufficient to override the local biological and community/amenity value of the site; and
  2. compensatory provision of at least equal value is made.

Policy NE.9

PM

District wide

NE.9/B

3298/B28, 3298/B31

Ensure all SPAs are annotated ‘SPA’ and SACs, annotated ‘SAC’ (or cSACs for candidate sites).

Policy NE.9

PM Inset 6

NE.9/C

2448/B8

Add ‘SI’ annotation to Winford Brook, west of Chew Magna.

Policy NE.9

PM Inset 19, 19b

NE.9/D

3081/B3

Delete SNCI at Rosemount, Radstock.

Policy NE.9

PM Inset 23

NE.9/E

502/B18

Change Old Pit Batch SNCI annotation from ‘RIG’ to ‘SN’.

Policy

NE.9/F

153/B6

Delete land at 177 Bloomfield Road, Bath from ‘SNCI’.

NE.9

NE.9/G

2915/B3

Delete ‘SNCI’ at Bathford Paper Mill car park.

PM Inset

NE.9/H

2965/B5

Delete ‘SNCI’ notation from New Bridge at Newbridge.

31

NE.9/I

2965/B5

Delete ‘SNCI’ notation from Midland Bridge, Bath.

 

NE.9/J

2965/B5

Delete ‘SNCI’ notation from Windsor bridge, Bath

 

NE.9/K

2965/B5

Delete ‘SNCI’ notation from Cleveland Bridge, Bath.

 

NE.9/L

2965/B5

Ensure River Avon SNCI is annotated as ‘SN’

 

NE.9/M

5001/B162

Add previously omitted ‘SNCI’ at Bathampton Down.

 

NE.9/N

5001/B56

Add ‘SN’ annotation to ‘SNCI’ west of Sydney Buildings, Bath.

 

NE.9/O

5001/B57

Add ‘SN’ annotation to ‘SNCI’ at Lymore Recreation Ground, Bath.

 

NE.9/P

5001/B78

Add ‘SN’ annotation to ‘SNCI’ at Recreation Ground adjacent to Bramble Way/Firs Field, North Road, Bath.

 

NE.9/Q

3305/B4

Delete ‘SNCI’ notation at Old Fosse Road, Bath.

 

NE.9/R

447/B38

Annotate land at Wellsway as ‘SNCI’ and not as a ‘RIG’.

 

NE.9/S

580/B8

Add ‘SN’ annotation along the Wansdyke ‘SNCI’, Odd Down.

Policy

NE.9/T

2965/B5

Delete ‘SNCI’ notation from Churchill Bridge, Bath.

NE.9

PM Inset 31a

NE.9/U

2965/B5

Delete ‘SNCI’ notation from A46 and railway bridge, Batheaston.

Policy NE.9

PM Inset 31c

NE.9/V

580/B9

Reduce the width of the ‘SNCI’ designation on the Wansdyke at Odd Down along its southern edge.

Title to C2.48

C2.48/A

683/B12

Locally Important Species and their Habitats

New Quick Guide 15A

QG15A/A

745/B21, 3298/B35

Quick Guide 15A

 

Priority Species and Habitats for Bath & North East Somerset

 

Habitats

1. Habitats for which there is a national Biodiversity Action Plan

2. Habitats of local ecological and cultural significance

3. Habitats listed in Annex 1 of the Habitats Directive

 

Species

 

1. UK BAP species with national Biodiversity Action Plans

2. Species listed in official UK Red Data Books

3. Nationally scarce/nationally notable species

4. European Protected Species as listed in the European Habitats Directive

5. Species which are known to be present in nationally or internationally important numbers (as defined by recognised national data bases e.g. WEBS).

6. Species which expert opinion suggests that Bath and North East Somerset is of particular importance in a national or regional context

7. Species that are rare in Avon according to the BRERC area status for that species group

8. Species which are present in 3 or fewer sites in Bath & North East Somerset.

9. Species where there is evidence of significant population decline locally

10. Species that if conserved will deliver significant conservation benefit for species or habitats that are on the list (so-called keystone or indicator species).

Policy NE.11

 

NE.11/A

 

 

NE.11/B

 

Editorial change

 

 

3126/B9

Development which would adversely affect a species of importance to B&NES Bath & North East Somerset or the habitat of such species, directly or indirectly, will not be permitted unless the importance of the development and its need for that particular location is sufficient to override the local value of the species, or compensatory provision of at least equivalent value is made.

Policy NE.12

 

 

NE.12/A

NE.12/B

NE.12/C

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NE.12/D

 

 

455/B13, 455/B20,

5001/B82

1427/B121, 3298/B24

 

 

 

 

 

 

3107/B13

Development will only be permitted where it;

  1. retains features of the landscape such as trees, copses, woodlands, grasslands, batches, ponds, roadside verges, veteran trees, hedgerows, walls, orchards and watercourses and their corridors if they are of amenity, wildlife or landscape value or if they contribute to a wider network of habitats;
  2. provides, where appropriate, for the creation of new features and habitats; and
  3. makes appropriate provision for the management of such features and habitats where they are of major importance for wild flora and fauna.

Where the loss of such features is unavoidable because the reasons for the development outweigh the need to retain the features, compensatory provision of at least equal value will be required.

Para

C2.56

C2.56/A

1427/B127, 120/B82, 2695/B3

Within the District, there are the Environment Agency has identified a number of groundwater source protection areas and these are shown on the Proposals Map. These are concentrated in the Chew Valley and the northern edge of the Mendip Hills and in areas north and south of Bath. In order to protect public water supplies and Development proposals in these areas need to be strictly controlled to prevent pollution which is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to clean up, it is important that development proposals affecting identified groundwater catchment areas and any others within the District, need to be strictly controlled.

New para C2.56A

C2.56A/A

1427/B126

Consideration should be given to any possible impact on groundwater recharge, flows and levels. If it is anticipated that works may penetrate the natural winter water table then the impact of such works will need to be assessed and discussed with the Environment Agency. If detrimental consequences of the water environment are likely, agreed mitigation measure will be necessary.

Policy NE.13

 

NE.13/A

 

1427/B127, 120/B82,

2695/B3

Development within the groundwater source protection areas shown on the Proposals Map, or any other groundwater catchment area, will not be permitted where it has an adverse impact on the quality of groundwater resource in terms of pollution and derogation of the resource.

Policy NE.13

PM

Insets 1, 2, 3, 4, 8

NE.13/B

5001/b73

Add following text to Insets: ‘Entire site lies within Water Source Protection Area (Policy NE.13)’.

New heading & paras C2.56B to C2.56D

 

 

C2.56B/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C2.56C/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C2.56D/A

 

 

2695/B1, 2695/B2,

5019/B7 (all changes)

Bath Hot Springs

 

C2.56B Since Roman times with the development of ‘Aquae Sulis’ as a retreat for health therapy, worship and relaxation, Bath’s Hot Springs have been the centre of social, economic and cultural developments in Bath. Settlement grew up around this resource which has culminated in the modern City of Bath. The Springs now attract many visitors annually. The thermal waters will once again be used for bathing with the opening of the Bath Spa in a complex that will combine historic buildings with a new state-of-the-art leisure spa.

 

C2.56C There are three Hot Springs in the centre of Bath: the Kings Springs within the Roman Bath complex, the Cross Bath Spring, and the Hetling Spring in Hot Bath Street. Together they produce around 1.3 million litres of mineral-rich thermal water per day with a temperature of between 41 and 46° C. These thermal waters arise from the Carboniferous Limestone via fissures in the overlying layers (a layer of alluvium, successive layers of Lias Clay and limestone and Triassic Mercia mudstone) and appear as springs on the surface.

 

C2.56D The Council is responsible for the protection of the Hot Springs in Bath. This duty was entrusted to the Civic Authority in the Charter of Incorporation of the City of Bath 1590 by Elizabeth I who decreed that the thermal waters should be available for public use in perpetuity. The Springs are protected by Section 33 of the County of Avon Act 1982 which specifies three control zones within which the depths of excavations is controlled. Policy NE.13A, however, seeks to ensure that both the quality and quantity of the groundwater source is protected from development that is likely to have an adverse effect on this resource within the Protection area as defined on the Proposals Map. This boundary corresponds with the outer control zone as defined under the Avon Act. The Environment Agency will also be consulted on applications which are likely to have an impact on the Hot Springs.

New Policy NE.13A

NE.13A/A

2695/B1, 2695/B2,

5019/B7

Development within the Bath Hot Springs Protection Area, as shown on the Proposals Map, that has an adverse impact on the quality or yield of the Bath Hot Springs, will not be permitted.

New Policy NE.13A

PM Inset 31

NE.13A/B

2695/B1, 2695/B2,

5019/B7

Add Bath Hot Springs Protection designation.

New Policy NE.13A

PM Inset 31a, 31f

NE.13A/C

2695/B1, 2695/B2,

5019/B7

Add following text to Insets 31a & 31f: ‘Entire Inset lies within the Bath Hot Springs Protection Area (Policy NE.13A)’.

New Policy NE.13A

Notation Sheet

NE.13A/D

2695/B1, 2695/B2,

5019/B7

Add new notation for Bath Hot Springs Protection Area.

New para C2.58A

NE.13A/E

1427/B123

PPG25 (Development & Flood Risk) sets out a sequential test in the allocation of land for development and the consideration of development proposals. Table 1 of the PPG defines fluvial Flood Risk zones and advises on the nature of development appropriate in each zone.

Policy NE.14

 

NE.14/A

 

 

NE.14/B

 

3007/B3, 3318/B2,

3004/B3, 3004/B1,

3004/B5, 723/B32,

2368/B3

Development will not be permitted where:

  1. it is subject to at risk from flooding, causes flooding elsewhere or where it would impede the flow of floodwater including areas identified on the Proposals Map unless the flood hazard can be mitigated;
  2. it is in a floodplain, including those identified on the Proposals Map, unless the flood hazard can be mitigated, it is not subject to flooding or does not cause flooding elsewhere;
  3. it causes net loss in the flood storage capacity;
  4. the run-off from the development would result in, or increase the risk of, flooding of watercourses, ditches, land or property;
  5. it would prevent the maintenance of the channels of watercourses; it would result in watercourse channel instability; or
  6. the existing drainage systems on the site are adversely affected, or if the land drainage of the site, when developed, is inadequate.

Policy NE.14

PM Central

NE.14/C

685/B37

Amend Avon Valley floodplain to show updated information and correct errors.

Policy NE.14

PM Inset 19

NE.14/D

5001/B58

Add floodplain notation at River Somer west of Wheelers Road.

Policy NE.14

PM Inset 31

NE.14/E

685/B31, 5018/B1

Amend floodplain notation to show updated information and to correct errors in the Newbridge area, western Bath, eastern Bath and the Batheaston area.

Policy NE.14

PM Inset 31a

NE.14/F

685/B31, 5018/B1

Amend floodplain notation to show updated information and to correct errors.

Policy NE.14

PM Inset 31f

NE.14/G

685/B31, 5014/B1

Amend floodplain in southern part of Batheaston village.

Policy NE.14

PM Notation Sheet

NE.14/H

685/B31

Delete Protected Floodplain Notation.

Diagram 12

DIAG12/A

685/B31

Show updated floodplain boundaries in the Bath area.

Para

C2.61

C2.61/A

 

C2.61/B

Editorial

 

1427/B124

As described in para C2.49, the Districts’ District’s rivers, canals and other watercourses make an important contribution to the character of the countryside and urban areas and are often of great wildlife importance and interest, including increasingly rare water-dependent habitats. They are also often associated with an increasing assemblage of historical and cultural features.

Para

C2.63

C2.63/A

3298/B25

Applications for development in the vicinity of the affecting a waterway will be assessed to ensure that the proposed use of land or buildings is appropriate and whether opportunities for enhancing the amenities of the waterways have been fully recognised. This includes, for example, improvements to the tree cover which contribute to the overall landscape, extensions to riverside footpaths, or the enhancement of wildlife habitat.

Policy NE.15

 

NE.15/A

 

685/B32

Development will only be permitted where it conserves or enhances the character, amenity or wildlife value of watercourses and their corridors.

Policy NE.16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NE.16/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

721/B36

Development which would result in the loss of the best and most versatile agricultural land (Grades 1, 2 and 3a based upon the DEFRA land classification) will not be permitted unless:

  1. the need for the development at that location is sufficient to override the need to protect the agricultural value of the land; or
  2. other sustainability considerations on available lower grade land outweigh the need to protect the agricultural value of the land; or
  3. agricultural practices carried out on available lower grade land contribute in a special way to the quality of the environment or local economy.

Where there is a choice of sites on land in Grades 3b-5, development should be directed towards land of the least grade, except where sustainability considerations suggest otherwise.

Top of Page

Diagram 10

Diagram 10 : The Landscape Character Areas

Diagram 10 : The Landscape Character Areas

1 Thrubwell Farm Plateau

10 Hicks Gate

2 Chew Valley

11 Bickley Wood Gorge

3 Upper Chew and Yeo Valleys

12 Cam and Wellow Brook Valleys

4 Mendip Slopes

13 Paulton and Peasedown St. John Ridge

5 Dundry Plateau

14 Avon Valley

6 Hinton Blewett and Newton St. Loe Plateau Lands

15 Norton Radstock Southern Farmlands

7 Hollow Marsh

16 Cotswolds Plateaux and Valleys

8 Farrington Gurney Farmlands

17 Hinton Charterhouse and Baggeridge Plateau

9 Stockwood Vale

18 Bathford to Limpley Stoke Valley

Source : Rural Landscapes of Bath & North East Somerset April 2003

Top of Page

Diagram 12

Diagram 12 : Floodplains & Groundwater  Source Protection Areas

Diagram 12 : Floodplains & Groundwater  Source Protection Areas

Top of Page

Contents Page

 

 

* © Bath & North East Somerset Council 2004. Please read our disclaimer and privacy statement Link to Directgov ­ widest range of government information and services online* * Valid HTML 4.01!*