|
LOCAL PLAN REF. NO. |
REV.
NO. |
SOURCE OF REVISION |
REVISION(S) |
|
Para
B4.5 |
B4.5/A
|
Consequential changes arising from 110/B4 |
The National Playing Fields Association (NPFA)
‘The Six Acre Standard’ has been applied by a range of
local authorities throughout the country. PPG17 ‘Sport and
Recreation’ says that councils should formulate local
standards, and the Council has carried out its own Playing
Pitch Assessment to develop a local standard for playing
fields. However but until studies on
informal recreation are complete that work is done
it is considered that the NPFA standard should be
adopted in the plan as a basis for calculating the
requirements for other forms of outdoor sport provision
and children’s play space. |
|
Para
B4.9 |
B4.9/A |
Consequential changes arising from 110/B4 |
Government guidance in PPG 17 advises
local authorities to resist the loss of open space, sports
and recreational facilities where it conflicts
with the wider public interest unless an
assessment has been undertaken which has clearly shown it to
be surplus to requirements. Surplus to requirements should
include consideration of all the functions that open space can
perform. Sports facilities It has
not only have recreation and amenity value but also
makes a vital contribution to the
conservation of the natural and built heritage of the area. Many
are also safeguarded under policy BH.15 as visually important
open space. |
|
Para
B4.10 |
B4.10/A |
Consequential changes arising from 110/B4 |
Outdoor sports include provision for
playing pitches, bowling greens, tennis courts and athletic
tracks. In the past, playing fields
and other areas used for formal recreation of
open space valuable for recreation have been lost to
other development, particularly that in private ownership in
Norton-Radstock and Bath. This depletes the stock and
increases pressure on other facilities in other areas of the
District.
|
|
Para
B4.12 |
B4.12/A |
110/B4 |
Although there is currently sufficient
publicly accessible open space, it is crucial that the
District’s stock of open space, particularly sports grounds
and playing fields, is well protected from development if it
is to meet future recreational requirements. In line with
Government advice and Policy 42 of the JRSP, Policy SR.1 seeks
to protect open space of recreational value throughout the
District including that not currently available for public use
such as some school playing fields.
The Council has undertaken a playing pitch assessment of
football, rugby, hockey and cricket to establish needs up to
2011. Further studies of other outdoor sports such as tennis,
bowling and athletics will be undertaken in the future. The
playing pitch assessment analysed the current provision of
playing fields by establishing how many are currently publicly
available (this can include public or privately owned pitches
including school pitches, as long as there are formal
agreements for public use) and how many teams play in the area
and thus need playing pitches. The study looked at provision
in four catchment areas, on the basis that travel to
facilities is more likely to occur within these areas, but
also to give a geographical dimension to current and future
provisions. However, the catchment areas do not necessarily
reflect all travel patterns to facilities. |
|
New Para B4.12A |
B4.12A/A |
110/B4 |
The playing pitch assessment estimates the
required provision of playing pitches until the year 2011
taking into account population projections, using estimated
team generation rates to predict future demand for playing
pitches. It also takes account of matters affecting usage such
as drainage problems. Without any net loss or gain of playing
fields until 2011, the surplus/shortfall of playing pitches
for the year 2011 is set out in Diagram 6 below:
Diagram 6: Estimated supply of sports
pitches for Bath & North East Somerset in 2011.
PMP calculations 2011
Supply of football pitches
Supply of Junior football pitches
Supply of Cricket pitches
Supply of Rugby Pitches
Supply of Junior Rugby pitches
Supply of Hockey Pitches
Total Surplus
/Shortfall of Pitches
Bath Catchment Area
22.6
- 9.8
- 7.9
4.5
-1.5
-6.4
1.4
Keynsham Catchment Area
7.5
-11.5
0.0
0.5
- 1.0
-0.9
-5.4
Norton-Radstock Catchment Area
7.4
- 10.0
-3.1
-3.0
-4.5
-0.8
-14.0
Chew Valley Catchment Area
9.5
-2.0
4.7
3.5
2.0
0.0
17.7
|
|
New Para
B4.12B |
B4.12B/A |
110/B4 |
The four catchment areas perform very
differently with high overall deficiencies in Keynsham and
Norton Radstock, an equilibrium in Bath and an over provision
of some sports in the Chew Valley Area. The overprovision in
the Chew Valley area is mainly due to the large provision of
pitches from the Chew Valley secondary school and the large
provision of pitches in the Whitchurch area, which mainly
cater for Bristol Clubs. |
|
Para
B4.13 |
B4.13/A
B4.13/B |
3261/B2
2462/B1 |
Thus, Policy SR.1A seeks to protect formal
recreational land throughout the District, including that not
currently available for public use such as some school playing
fields. There may, however, be special
circumstances where the development of existing land of
recreational value can be justified but in
such cases the existing facility will have to be suitably
enhanced or appropriate alternative provision found elsewhere
to recompense the loss. However, before accepting the loss
of an existing formal recreational site to built-up
development, the Council will consider other recreational uses
appropriate to these sites such as community open space,
allotments, etc. |
|
Policy SR.1 (to be new Policy SR.1A) |
SR.1A/A |
110/B16, 3233/B5, 3260/B4, 3261/B13, 3274/B3, 3299/B31,
88/B29, 2462/B1, 5010/B269
|
Development involving the loss of all or
any part of playing fields and or
other formal recreational land, including those
shown on the Proposals Map, or land last used for such
purposes open space shown on the Proposals Map
will only not be permitted where
unless:
- there is no longer a demand or prospect of demand
for the recreational use of the site and a deficiency
would not be created in the short or long term by the
development; or
- the proposed development only affects land which is
incapable of being used for recreation; or
- the importance of the proposed development outweighs the
recreational and amenity value of the site and
suitable replacement facilities alternative
provision can be found of at
least equivalent quality, quantity and or
greater community benefit are provided in an
easily accessible locations well served by
a range of transport modes; or
- the proposed development is for an indoor or outdoor
sports facility with at least equal community benefit to
outweigh the loss of the existing or former recreational
use.
|
|
Policy SR1A
PM Inset East |
SR.1A/B |
5001/B164 |
Designate the sportsground at Bath Road, Hinton
Charterhouse as formal recreational land.
|
|
Policy |
SR.1A/C |
5001/B164 |
Designate Dunkerton cricket ground as formal recreational
land. |
|
SR1A
PM Inset |
SR.1A/D |
5001/B164 |
Designate Newton College playing field, Newton Park as
formal recreational land. |
|
Central |
SR.1A/E |
5001/B164 |
Designate Clutton cricket ground as formal recreational
land. |
|
|
SR.1A/F |
5001/B164 |
Designate Camerton Recreation Ground as formal recreational
land. |
|
|
SR.1A/G |
5001/B164 |
Designate Hursley Hill football ground as formal
recreational land. |
|
Policy SR1A
PM Inset 11 |
SR.1A/H |
5001/B164 |
Designate playing field west of Somerdale as formal
recreational land. |
|
Policy SR1A
PM Inset 13 |
SR.1A/I |
5001/B164 |
Designate Clutton football ground as formal recreational
land.
|
|
Policy SR1A
PM Inset 19 |
SR.1A/J |
5001/B38 |
Extend formal recreational designation (Policy SR.1A) to
include full extent of playing field off Withies Lane.
|
|
Policy SR1A
PM Inset 20 |
SR.1A/K |
451/B17, 730/B17
1889/B1, 1915/B2
1916/B2, 2002/B2
2328/B2, 2330/B2
2996/B1, 5001/B155 |
Add formal recreational designation notation to the school
playing field at Timsbury |
|
Policy |
SR.1A/L |
3274/B5 |
Amend formal recreational land designation at the Royal
High School. |
|
SR1A
PM Inset |
SR.1A/M |
714/B7, 1902/B1, 3309/B3, 714/B6 |
Delete formal recreational land designation from playing
fields on eastern part of University of Bath Campus (see new
GDS.1 site B11). |
|
31 |
SR.1A/N |
505/B80, 505/B93 |
Add formal recreational land designation to the Recreation
Ground at Holcombe Lane, Bathampton |
|
|
SR.1A/O |
5001/B36 |
Designate Bathford playing fields as formal recreational
land. |
|
|
SR.1A/P |
3256/B4, 3309/B4 |
Delete formal recreational land designation at Newton
Fields Recreation Ground. |
|
Policy SR1A
PM Inset 31a |
SR.1A/Q |
3260/B2 |
Amend formal recreational designation at Bath Recreation
Ground to exclude land which is not covered by the Sport
England definition of playing fields. |
|
New Para B4.13A (was B4.28) |
B4.13A/A |
Consequential changes arising from 110/B4 |
Informal recreation and leisure comprises a
range of pursuits including walking, playing, cycling and
other activities that are not formally organised. Facilities
available for such activity range from parks, amenity open
spaces including common land, to equipped play areas. As with
sports grounds these open spaces are often as important for
their amenity value as for their recreational value and
contribute to the enhancement to the environments in which
they are located making them attractive places to be in or
pass through. Many of these areas are safeguarded under Policy
BH.15 as Visually Important Open Spaces. However where
a need has been identified for the further provision of land
for informal recreational use land is allocated in Policy
SR.2. Policy SR.1B aims to ensure that this
valuable recreational resource is safeguarded. |
|
New Policy SR1B |
SR.1B/A |
3233/B5, 3260/B4, 3261/B13, 3274/B3, 3299/B31, 88/B29,
241/B11, 2638/B5, 2466/B5, 2462/B1, 2448/B5 |
Development involving the loss of land used
or last used for informal recreation, including children’s
playing space, will not be permitted, unless suitable, equally
accessible alternative provision of equivalent community
benefit is made. |
|
Para
B4.14 |
B4.14/A |
Consequential changes arising from 110/B4 |
B4.14 Outdoor sports includes provision for
playing pitches, bowling greens, tennis courts and athletic
tracks. Existing facilities have been assessed to see whether
they meet the NPFA’s minimum standards for youth and adult
outdoor playing space for sport, see Quick Guide 9. |
|
Quick Guide 9 (to be moved between Para
B4.36 and B4.37) |
QG9/A |
Consequential changes arising from 110/B4 |
Quick Guide 9
National Playing Fields Association (NPFA)
Standards
CATEGORY OF
PROVISION
MINIMUM PROVISION PER 1000 POPULATION
(A) Youth and Adult Outdoor playing space for Sport:
1.6-1.8 ha.
(4-4.5 acres) of which 1.2 ha
(3 acres) should be for pitch sports
(B) Children’s Playing Space:
- outdoor equipped playgrounds/
- other designated play facilities
0.2-0.3ha.
(0.5-0.7 acres)
(ii) casual or informal playing space within housing
areas
0.4-0.5 ha.
(1.0-1.25 acres)
Total Playing Space
(A) + (B)
0.6 – 0.8 ha
(1.5 -1.95 acres)
2.2-2.6-2.6 ha.
(5.5-6.5 acres)
|
|
Para
B4.16 |
B4.16/A |
110/B4, 564/B36 |
There is currently sufficient amounts of
publicly accessible outdoor playing space in or close to Bath based
on the on the NPFA minimum standards
taking into account the availability of many of the school
outdoor sports facilities to the public. However, provision
varies across the City. |
|
Para
B4.17 |
B4.17/A
B4.17/B |
110/B4, 2306/B4
5001/B104 |
The existing outdoor facilities in Keynsham are estimated
to be insufficient by the year 2011 sufficient to
continue to meet the NPFA minimum standard for
its residents through the Plan period. This takes
into account private facilities at the Somerdale site and
Crown Fields and Manor Road Playing Fields as
well as some the community use of the
two secondary schools. |
|
Para
B4.18 |
B4.18/A
B4.18/B |
1427/B46
110/B4, 2306/B4
Change arising from deletion of Site GDS.1/K2 |
These facilities are also used by a larger
catchment area which creates additional demand for their use.
Some facilities lie within the floodplain of the River Avon
and are therefore prone to flooding at certain times of the
year. Built development in the floodplain to support these
uses is unlikely to be acceptable. In order to meet predicted
shortfalls there is scope to re-designate pitches, improve
drainage and formalise use of school pitches. The
proposed urban extension at South West Keynsham will
inevitably give rise to additional local requirements for
outdoor sports facilities in this part of Keynsham where there
is a limited availability of such facilities. It will also
meet Plan objectives on securing Balanced Communities. Further
provision of outdoor sports facilities will therefore be
required under Policy GDS.1 site K2. |
|
Para
B4.19 |
B4.19/A |
110/B4, 578/B53
|
The situation in the Norton-Radstock area
is similar to that in Bath and Keynsham with
the existing supply of outdoor sports facilities being
insufficient to meet expected need until 2011.continuing
to meet NPFA standards. However this relies on the
availability of school playing fields. |
|
Para
B4.20 |
B4.20/A |
578/B53
|
Proposals for development south of Charlton
Park adjacent to the A367 provides an opportunity to secure
additional facilities to supplement the existing supply and
meet Plan objectives on Balanced Communities (Policy GDS.1
site NR1). In addition To
secure adequate long term provision land is allocated at Manor
Road, Writhlington for outdoor sports pitches. Developers with
proposals for new housing will be expected to contribute to
this provision (see Policy SR.6). |
|
Para
B4.21 |
B4.21/A |
110/B4 |
Provision for outdoor sports facilities in
some of the most villages appears
to meet current needs although others still have a
need for this type of facility anticipated needs
until 2011. There is a range of facilities including
pitches and courts again supplemented by the community use of
schools including those outdoor facilities on the edge of
Bath. However, the assessment has identified a shortfall of
four junior football and one cricket pitch in Paulton, and a
shortfall of four junior football pitches in Mendip Ward. The
allocation at Writhlington will help to meet some of these
deficiencies and there is scope in the Chew Valley catchment
area to re-designate pitches. |
|
Para
B4.28 |
B4.28/A |
Editorial
|
B4.28 (Para
moved to B4.13A) |
|
Para
B4.29 |
B4.29/A |
2050/B1 |
Bath has a number of large open spaces that
are regularly used for informal recreation including Royal
Victoria Park, Alice Park, Sydney Gardens, Henrietta Park, Alexandra
Park and Parade Gardens. There are also a number of
recreation grounds and many other smaller areas of amenity
open space accessible to the public. |
|
Para
B4.31 |
B4.31/A |
Changes arising from deletion of Site GDS.1/NR1 |
Informal public open space provision in Norton-Radstock
largely comprises small amenity areas and playing fields. Land
off Clevedon Road, Welton is allocated under Policy SR.2 and
will improve provision. Land is also set aside at Foxhills,
Radstock for informal public open space as part of a
comprehensive redevelopment of the former railway and wagon
works (Policy GDS.1). Outdoor recreational provision
is also part of the scheme proposed on land south of Charlton
Park, Midsomer Norton as set out in Policy GDS.1. |
|
Policy SR.2 (relocated between Paras B4.41
and B4.42) |
SR.2/A
SR.2/B
|
110/B18
578/B44
578/B54 |
Land is allocated for formal and informal
sport and recreational use on the following sites as defined
on the Proposals Map:
Primarily for outdoor sports provision
- Manor Road, Writhlington: 7.8 ha for outdoor sports
pitches and essential ancillary facilities.
Primarily for informal recreation
- Land along the Somer Valley between Midsomer Norton town
centre and Radstock Road: 13.3 ha for proposed Town Park.
- Land between Somerdale and the River Avon: 1.5 ha for
improvements to existing provision.
- Former swimming pool site at Clevedon Road, Welton Vale:
1.2 ha for general amenity area.
- Adjoining proposed Community Hall at Waterford Park,
Westfield: 0.65ha for extension to children’s equipped
playground (NEAP).
6. Slopes above Foxhills, Radstock: 2.3 ha
for informal recreation.
|
|
Policy SR.2
PM Inset 19 |
SR.2/C |
578/B4
578/B44, 578/B54 |
Delete informal recreational designation (Policy SR.2) from
land at Waterford Park, Westfield.
|
|
Para
B4.34 |
B4.34/A |
Editorial change |
Play is crucial for all aspects of a child’s
development. This is recognised in the Council’s Play Policy
and Strategy. The Council has an important role in providing
opportunities for children ‘to explore, manipulate,
experience and affect their environment within challenging but
secure settings’ (B&NES Bath &
North East Somerset Play Policy – 2000). |
|
Para
B4.35 |
B4.35/A |
Editorial |
In accordance with the NPFA standards
children’s playing space should be accessible by foot
without having to cross busy roads and within a recommended
walking distance from home. The three categories of playing
space are Local Area for Play (LAP), Local Equipped Area for
Play (LEAP) and Neighbourhood Equipped Area for Play (NEAP),
see ‘Schedule to Policy SR.3 for Minimum Standard for
Children’s Play Provision’. |
|
Para
B4.36 |
B4.36/A
|
Editorial
|
In Bath there are opportunities for
play in parks and many other open spaces including equipped
play areas. When assessed against the NPFA standards (see
Quick Guide 9) there is only a small overall shortfall of
existing children’s playing space provision City-wide.
However there is a need for further LEAPs in a number of areas
including Upper Weston, Lower Weston/Locksbrook Road, Upper
Oldfield Park, Combe Down, Lansdown and the City centre where
accessible play areas would meet not only the needs of local
residents but those visitors with children. |
|
Para
B4.38 |
B4.38/A |
Changes arising from deletion of Site GDS.1/K2
|
Keynsham
currently has 7 LEAPs and one NEAP (Memorial Park). But
assessing this provision against the NPFA standards there is a
need to provide further LEAPs. Although no sites have been
identified, the areas in need are in the vicinity of the Lays
Drive Estate, south of Coronation Road, the Hawthorne Close
area, and west of Chandag Road near Keynsham Cricket Ground.
The existing LEAPs at Manor Road and Kelston Road could also
be upgraded to provide two more NEAPs for the town. The
proposed urban extension at South West Keynsham will also
generate a need for further children’s playspace provision
which is one of the site requirements under Policy GDS.1. |
|
Para
B4.40 |
B4.40/A |
Changes arising from results of Playing Field Assessment |
Children’s playing space provision in the
villages appears inadequate if assessed strictly
against the NPFA minimum standard. However provision also
needs to take account of accessibility, the availability of
recreation grounds for casual play and opportunities for
informal play in the surrounding countryside. There is a
need for new LEAPs in Peasedown St John, Paulton, the northern
part of High Littleton, Pensford, Compton Martin, Ubley,
Temple Cloud, Chew Magna and Saltford. |
|
Para
B4.41 |
B4.41/A |
Editorial
|
The Local pPlan can
contribute to achieving opportunities for play by ensuring
that existing outdoor play space is retained and, where
development takes place, new play areas are provided. Where a
suitable site has been identified to help meet the shortfalls
in both formal and informal recreational provision in
particular areas of the District land is allocated under
Policy SR.2. |
|
Para
B4.42 |
B4.42/A
B4.42/B |
Editorial
Editorial |
(First sentence moved to end of para B4.41)
During the Plan period new areas of equipped children’s
playing space will be required to be provided as part of new
housing development proposed under Policy GDS.1, as
well as in association with windfall sites and from the
renewal of planning permissions for residential development.
The level of provision will be based on the NPFA recommended
minimum standard as set out in Quick Guide 9 above. |
|
Para
B4.43 |
B4.43/A
|
Editorial changes (In such cases…) |
Depending on the size of the site it may
not always be appropriate to make provision on site or to
justify the provision of full play facilities. In such cases
it may be more appropriate to provide accessible alternatives
or make a financial contribution to the provision or
enhancement of suitabley located
alternative sites. In some circumstances, because of the type
of occupier a proposed development caters for, e.g.
accommodation for the elderly, it may not be appropriate to
seek provision of children’s playing space and such cases
will be considered on their merits. |
|
Policy SR.3 |
SR.3/A
|
578/B87, 3098/B19, 3261/B12, 2638/B1, 2306/B5
|
Proposals for
Residential development which generates a need for
children’s playing space will only be permitted be
expected to provide land for such use where safely
accessible and suitable provision in accordance with the
standard set out in the Schedule to the Policy
of 0.8 ha children’s playing space per 1000 population is
provided and secured on site.
Where the Council agrees that it is not
appropriate to provide all or part of the children’s playing
space on site, developers will be expected to provide the
facility at an alternative, conveniently accessible location.
Alternatively, a financial contribution will be sought from
the developer towards the enhancement or provision of
conveniently accessible children’s playing space.
Where the site proposed
development is too small to justify the
full provision of a children’s playing space in accordance
with standards set out in the Schedule attached to this
policy, but would consist of ten or more dwellings, the
Council will seek a financial contribution from the developer
towards the enhancement or provision of conveniently
accessible children’s playing space provision of
a full facility or the facility cannot be physically located
on-site, appropriate financial contributions will be sought
either
- towards providing and securing, new, conveniently
located and safely accessible off-site provision; or
- where the need is of a purely qualitative nature,
towards the enhancement of existing, conveniently and
safely accessible children’s play space.
|
|
Schedule to policy SR.3 |
SR.3/B
SR.3/C |
5001/B105
578/B87 |
SCHEDULE TO POLICY SR.3: MINIMUM STANDARD
FOR CHILDREN’S PLAY PROVISION
(based on the recommendations of the
National Playing Fields association 1992)
CATEGORY OF PROVISION
MINIMUM PROVISION PER 1,000 POPULATION
(EXCLUDING BUFFER ZONES)
EXAMPLES OF FACILITIES
(i) Outdoor equipped playgrounds and other designated play
facilities
) 0.2-0.3 ha. (0.5-0.75
) acres)
)
)
)
)
) 0.8 ha
Local Area for Play (LAP):
for 4-6 year olds
Small low-key games area of at least 100 sq.m.
1 minute walking time (100 metres) from home.
(ii) casual or informal playing space within housing areas
) 0.4-0.5 ha. (1.0-1.25
) acres)
)
Local Equipped Area for Play (LEAP):
Mainly for 4-8 years olds; about 5 types of equipment:
small games area of at least 400 sq.m.
5 minutes walking time (400 metres) from home.
Neighbourhood Equipped Area for Play (NEAP:
Mainly for older children
15 minute walking time (1,000 metres) from home.
|
|
|
SR.3/D
|
3261/B4 |
POPULATION OF ANY DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED ON THE
FOLLOWING OCCUPANCY RATES:
TYPE OF DWELLING:
OCCUPANCY:
1 bedroom
2 persons
2 bedroom
3 2 persons
3 bedroom
4 3 persons
4 or more bedrooms
5 3 persons
5 or more bedrooms
4 persons
|
|
Policy SR.4 |
SR.4/A |
1427/B47, 3257/B4 |
Development for sport or recreational
facilities will be permitted within or adjoining a settlement
defined in Policy SC.1 provided:
- it complements the existing pattern of recreational
facilities;
ii) it is in readily accessible locations
well served by transport modes;
iii) there would be no adverse impact on
public safety; and
iv) the amenities of local residents are
not adversely affected by air, noise or light pollution.
|
|
Policy SR.5 |
SR.5/A
SR.5/B |
246/B11
5010/B268 |
Development for sport or recreational
facilities outside the scope of Policy SR.4 will only be
permitted where:
- it cannot be accommodated elsewhere
ia) in the case of ancillary facilities,
it is well-related to the attraction it serves;
- the proposal either by itself or together with other
existing and proposed recreational facilities does not
have an unacceptable impact on landscape character;
- it would not give rise to adverse environmental
conditions including the impact of air, noise, water
quality and light pollution and be detrimental to
public safety.
New buildings will only be permitted where
the re-use or adaptation of existing buildings is not
practical or viable, and they are of a scale appropriate to
the location and recreational use. |
|
Policy SR.6 |
SR.6/A |
578/B87, 110/B17, 578/B55, 3098/B20
|
Where local provision for recreational
purposes is inadequate to serve the projected needs arising
from occupants of new development proposals, development will
not be permitted unless provision related in kind and scale to
meet these needs is secured.
Where the development is fairly and
reasonably related in terms of accessibility to land allocated
for outdoor recreational provision in Policy SR.2 a
contribution will be sought from the developer towards the
provision of that site.
Development which generates a need for
outdoor and indoor sport will only be permitted where
conveniently accessible and suitable provision in accordance
with the standard of 1.26 ha outdoor sport and 7.7 sq. m.
indoor sport per 1000 population is provided and secured on
site. Where the site is too small to justify full outdoor or
indoor sports facilities, or the facilities cannot be
physically located on-site, appropriate financial
contributions will be sought:
- towards providing new, conveniently accessible
off-site provision; or
- where the need is of a purely qualitative nature,
towards the enhancement of existing, conveniently
accessible provision.
|
|
Schedule to Policy SR.6 |
SR.6/B
SR.6/C |
3098/B20, 578/B55, 110/B17
3261/B4 |
SCHEDULE TO POLICY SR.6 : MINIMUM STANDARD
FOR OUTDOOR PLAYING SPACE FOR SPORT
(based on the recommendations of the
National Playing Fields association 1992)
CATEGORY OF PROVISION
MINIMUM PROVISION PER 1,000 POPULATION
EXAMPLES OF FACILITIES
Youth and Adult Outdoor playing space for Sport:
1.6-1.8 ha.
(4-4.5 acres) of which 1.26 ha
(3.1 acres) should be for pitch sports. In
addition, 7.7 sq ms should be for indoor sports.
Sports pitches, tennis courts, bowling greens, athletic
tracks, training areas etc.
POPULATION OF ANY DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED
ON THE FOLLOWING OCCUPANCY RATES:
TYPE OF DWELLING:
OCCUPANCY:
1 bedroom
2 persons
2 bedroom
3 2 persons
3 bedroom
4 3 persons
4 or more bedrooms
5 3 persons
5 or more bedrooms
4 persons
|
|
Policy SR.7 |
SR.7/A |
578/B56, 686/B83, 721/B22, 2965/B7 |
Development for commercial leisure uses
will be permitted firstly within, or if no
suitable sites are available, on the edge of Bath’s
Central Shopping Area, Keynsham,
Midsomer-Norton and Radstock town centres as defined on
the Proposals Map; or, if no suitable sites are available,
on the edge of these centres; and only then at out-of-centre
locations well served by public transport.
Proposals outside the centres will be
required to demonstrate that there is a need for the
development and that provided it does not
prejudice the vitality and viability of these centres and
is not on land allocated for another use.
Proposals outside these areas will only be
permitted if it can be demonstrated that there is a need for
the development which cannot be met within or on the edge of
urban centres and the site is well served by public transport. |
|
Para
B4.57 |
B4.57/A |
3260/B1 |
Government guidance advises that local
planning authorities give sympathetic consideration to
development proposals for all-seater stadia particularly where
existing facilities are substandard or a club is seeking
relocation. This is in line with JRSP Policy 44 which supports
the provision of a stadium in Bath to accommodate
approximately 20,000 spectators. There are two existing stadia
in Bath: at the Recreation Ground, currently home to Bath
Rugby Plc, with a capacity of approximately 8,500
8,200 and the Bath City's Football Club ground at
Twerton Park, with a capacity of approximately 9,000. Both
clubs are investigating the possibility of new facilities or
stadia including the option of with a view to sharing
facilities. The National Facilities Strategy for Rugby Union
in England published in 2001 indicates that the minimum
capacity for Premiership rugby clubs stadiums should be 10,000
during the season 2003/4. In the light of this, the
environmental constraints of the City and the current levels
of patronage it is considered that a more realistic capacity
is a stadium of about 15,000. This would also be adequate to
accommodate the football club's needs. |
|
Policy SR.8 |
SR.8/A
SR.8/B |
3260/B6
88/B33
|
Proposals for the development of one major
all-seater sports stadium will be permitted in Bath provided:
- it can provide accommodation for approximately 15,000
spectators and a range of sporting activities and other
leisure events;
- the majority of the sports facilities and all
leisure facilities are made available for use by the
community;
- the proposal would not give rise to an unacceptable
environmental impact;
- commercial or retail uses associated with the scheme do
not have an adverse impact on the vitality and viability
of the
City centre shopping centres
identified under Policy S.1;
- the facilities will be served by public transport.
|
|
Para
B4.60 |
B4.60/A |
574/B16 |
The Local Plan seeks to increase
opportunities for and access to a diversity of informal
recreational uses in the countryside, whilst conserving
and enhancing its natural beauty and amenities. This includes
improving links from the City, towns and villages to informal
recreational activities on the urban fringes and to the open
countryside beyond. The identification of ‘green routes’
between residential and employment areas and town/suburban
centres and the improvement of access/links to open spaces and
parks and other off-road routes will contribute towards access
through and beyond the urban areas and offers an alternative
and more sustainable method of travelling. This is exemplified
by the Community Forest Walk Path through
the Forest of Avon in the North West of the District (see also
Policy NE.5). |
|
Para
B4.62 |
B4.62/A |
246/B15 |
One of the Countryside Agency’s
objectives is that all PROWs in England are legally defined,
properly maintained and well publicised with the support of
Highways Authorities, landowners and other interested bodies. It
is also promoting the establishment of Greenways and
‘Quiet Roads’. With the aid of Lottery funds,
the charity Sustrans is also developing such routes
as part of a National Cycle Network which also
incorporates disused railway lines, riversides and previously
developed land. |
|
Para
B4.64 |
B4.64/A
B4.64/B |
Consequential changes arising from 246/B14
686/B124, 2016, B4, 2490/B5, 120/B20, 2686/B4, 2462/B6
5001/B106 |
Where a recreational route follows the line
of a Some of the
former railway, lines are also safeguarded as
cycle routes under Policy T.7 and there may be opportunities
for other complementary recreational uses e.g. walking.
its course is protected as a sustainable transport route
under Policy T.9 as designated on the Proposals Map. This
applies to parts of routes 1 and 3 in Policy SR.9. The
presence of the Avon Valley Railway alongside the Bath and
Bristol Railway Path just over the district’s
northern boundary at Bitton demonstrates that these
uses can coexist. |
|
Policy SR.9 |
SR.9/A
{
{
{
{
{
SR.9/B {
{
{
{
{
|
5010/B266
|
Development which adversely affects the
recreational and amenity value of or access to existing
and proposed routes for walking, cycling or horse riding,
including those shown on the Proposals Map and other public
rights of way will not be permitted.
Existing
- Avon Walkway: North of Saltford along Bristol and Bath
Railway Path to Newbridge; along River Avon path to
Churchill Bridge; along Kennet and Avon Canal towpath to
Dundas Aqueduct.
- The Cotswold Way (designated National Trail): Bath Abbey
through Weston to Lansdown.
- Limestone Link: Compton Martin to Hinton Blewett and along
Cam Valley to Dundas Aqueduct; along Kennet and Avon canal
towpath and St. Catherine’s Valley to Monkswood Reservoir.
- Two Rivers Way: Along the Chew Valley from Keynsham to
west of Chew Stoke; then through Nempnett Thrubwell parish
to the District Boundary.
- Bristol and Bath Railway Path: from River Avon at Saltford
to Newbridge, Bath.
- Three Peaks Way: Circular route between Maes Knoll, on
Dundry Hill, Knowle Hill south of Chew Magna and Blackberry
Hill near Farmborough.
- Community Forest Path: From the Two Rivers Way at Pensford
to Norton Malreward, Norton Hawkfield and then crossing the
District boundary into North Somerset.
- Bath Skyline Walk: circular walk between Rainbow Wood,
Widcombe, Bathwick Wood, Bathampton Wood and Bushey Norwood.
Proposed
- Bristol and North Somerset Line: Radstock to Welton
Hollow; Welton to Thicketmead; Old Mills to Farrington
Gurney; Farrington Gurney to Hallatrow; Hallatrow to
Chelwood roundabout; section at Whitchurch.
- Somerset and Dorset Line: Silver Street, Midsomer Norton
to Radstock Centre; Silver Street to County boundary;
Radstock Centre to Stoney Littleton, Shoscombe.
- Cam Valley Branch Line: Hallatrow to Carlingcott,
including stretches of Somerset Coal Canal towpath.
12. Riverside Walk, Bath: Pulteney
Bridge to Cleveland Bridge. |
|
Policy SR.9
PM Inset East |
SR.9/C |
246/B14, 2016/B4
2490/B5, 120/B20
2462/B6, 2686/B4
246/B16, 3126/B27
745/B16, 578/B57 |
Delete Recreational Route from former railway line between
Shoscombe & Midford where it overlaps with new Sustainable
Transport Route. |
|
Policy SR.9
PM Inset Central |
SR.9/D |
246/B14, 2016/B4
2490/B5, 120/B20
2462/B6, 2686/B4
246/B16, 3126/B27
578/B57 |
Delete Recreational Route where overlaps with new
Sustainable Transport Route from former railway line between
Old Mills & Hallatrow and the westernmost section of the
former Camerton Branch Line to the north of Hallatrow.
|
|
Policy SR.9
PM Inset 10 |
SR.9/E |
246/B14, 2016/B4
2490/B5, 120/B20
2462/B6, 2686/B4
246/B16, 3126/B27
578/B57 |
Delete Recreational Route from former railway line north
Whitchurch village where it overlaps with new Sustainable
Transport Route. |
|
Policy SR.9
PM Inset 11 |
SR.9/F |
246/B14, 2016/B4
2490/B5, 120/B20
2462/B6, 2686/B4
246/B16, 3126/B27
578/B57 |
Delete Recreational Route from former railway (Bath-Bitton)
where it overlaps with new Sustainable Transport Route. |
|
Policy SR.9
PM Inset 11b |
SR.9/G |
246/B14, 2016/B4
2490/B5, 120/B20
2462/B6, 2686/B4
246/B16, 3126/B27
578/B57 |
Delete Recreational Route along Bath-Bitton former railway
line where it overlaps with new Sustainable Transport Route.
|
|
Policy SR.9
PM Inset 12 |
SR.9/H |
246/B14, 2016/B4
2490/B5, 120/B20
2462/B6, 2686/B4
246/B16, 3126/B27
578/B57 |
Delete Policy SR.9 from former railway line where it
overlaps with new Sustainable Transport Route.
|
|
Policy SR.9
PM Inset 15 |
SR.9/I |
246/B14, 2016/B4
2490/B5, 120/B20
2462/B6, 2686/B4
246/B16, 3126/B27
578/B57 |
Delete Recreational Route where it overlaps with new
Sustainable Transport Route.
|
|
Policy SR.9
PM Inset 16 |
SR.9/J |
246/B14, 2016/B4
2490/B5, 120/B20
2462/B6, 2686/B4
246/B16, 3126/B27
578/B57 |
Delete Recreational Route from former railway line north
east of Hallatrow where it overlaps with new Sustainable
Transport Route.
|
|
Policy SR.9
PM Inset 19 |
SR.9/K |
246/B14, 2016/B4
2490/B5, 120/B20
2462/B6, 2686/B4
246/B16, 3126/B27
578/B57 |
Delete Recreational Route from former railway line where
overlap with new Sustainable Transport Route ;
- Hallatrow to Radford
- Old Mills to Paglynch Farm, Shoscombe
- District boundary between Withies Lane & Silver St.
|
|
Policy SR.9
PM Inset 19a |
SR.9/L |
246/B14, 2016/B4
2490/B5, 120/B20
2462/B6, 2686/B4
246/B16, 3126/B27
578/B57 |
Delete Recreational Route on former S&D railway Line
where route is duplicated by new Sustainable Transport Route.
|
|
Policy SR.9
PM Inset 19b |
SR.9/M |
246/B14, 2016/B4
2490/B5, 120/B20
2462/B6, 2686/B4
246/B16, 3126/B27
578/B57 |
Delete Recreational Route from former railway line north of
Tom Huyton Memorial Park |
|
Policy SR.9
PM Inset 27 |
SR.9/N |
246/B14, 2016/B4
2490/B5, 120/B20
2462/B6, 2686/B4
246/B16, 3126/B27
578/B57 |
Delete Recreational Route west of the Brow |
|
Policy SR.9
PM Inset 31 |
SR.9/O |
2956/B3 |
Correct error in route of the Cotswold Way at Prospect
Stile in parish of Kelston.
|
|
Policy SR.9
PM Insets 31 & 31a |
SR.9/P |
2956/B3 |
Show route of the Cotswold Way north & south of
Victoria Park & through the City Centre, Bath |
|
Para
B4.80 |
B4.80/A
B4.80/B
B4.80/C
B4.80/D |
Editorial
564/B31
1427/B51
Editorial |
Development proposals need to be carefully
controlled to avoid the gradual erosion of the inherent
character of the River, Canal and Lakes and their immediate
environment (see Para B7.121 on residential moorings).
The Waterside Recreational Activity Areas (WRAAs) listed in
Policy SR.10 are either within the Green Belt and/or AONB.
Therefore proposals for additional facilities will need to
be considered carefully, particularly in the context of
Policies GB.1 and NE.2 as well as Policy SR.4, taking into
account of the impact of traffic and
parking on these sensitive environmental locations. |
|
Policy SR.10 |
SR.10/A |
5010/B47
|
Recreational development associated with
the River Avon, Kennet and Avon Canal and Chew Valley Lake
will only be permitted in Bath and the Waterside Recreational
Activity Areas listed below and defined on the Proposals Map unless
they comply with the criteria in Policy SR.11 :
River Avon
- land at Hanham Lock;
- Kelston Mill, Kelston;
- land adjoining the southern boundary of Batheaston
public car park.
Kennet and Avon Canal
4. area between Canal Terrace and the Tyning Road amenity
area, Bathampton;
5. area at Hampton Wharf, Bathampton
6. area between Claverton Canal Bridge, and The Pumphouse,
Claverton including part of Warleigh Island adjacent to the
River Avon;
7. land along the former Somerset Coal Canal between
Dundas Wharf and Winsley Road, Monkton Combe;
8. land at Dundas Wharf, Monkton Combe;
Chew Valley Lake
9. picnic sites, Walley Lane, Chew Magna;
11. sailing club, Chew Stoke; and
12. Woodford Lodge, Chew Stoke.
|