|
LOCAL PLAN REF. NO. |
REV.
NO. |
SOURCE OF REVISION |
REVISION(S) |
|
Para
B3.5 |
B3.5/A |
505/B53, 686/B80, 5001/B98
110/B9 (They …) |
Community services include a wide range of
facilities crucial for the well being of the residents of Bath
& North East Somerset. Provision includes community
meeting places, youth centres, education facilities at schools
and colleges, health care provided at hospitals, clinics and
surgeries, libraries, places of worship, and
venues for community arts, and services delivered by post
offices and some shops. They also include allotments
and cemeteries, together with sports and recreation facilities
(dealt with in the Sports and Recreation Chapter – B4). Community
services are provided by a range of public, private and
voluntary organisations. |
|
Para
B3.9 |
B3.9/A |
Editorial |
The Council's Social Services function is
based at offices in Bath, Keynsham and Midsomer Norton. The
service is responsible for a number of specialist areas
including safeguarding and promoting the welfare of disabled
and vulnerable adults, children and the elderly through a
range of provision including community and day care,
residential homes, family support, home and nursing care.
Paras B3.69-B3.71 B3.72-B3.73 and
Policy CF.5 CF.6 deal more
specifically with Community Care provision. |
|
Para
B3.11
now B3.20 |
B3.20/A |
Editorial |
Bath is fortunate
in having a variety of community meeting places available to
serve the needs of different geographical areas of the City
and immediate surrounding areas. Accommodation ranges from
small church rooms, community halls and the use of some
schools to the larger more central venues such as the Pavilion
and the Forum that serve a much wider area as well as the
residents of Bath. The local authority Youth Centres also
contribute to the provision of meeting places in Bath (see
paras B3.20-B3.23 B3.29-B3.32). |
|
Para B3.18
now B3.27 |
B3.27/A |
Editorial to provide update |
Investigations continue to find alternative
provision to replace The
former Oriel Hall, Upper Swainswick that was
demolished when the Batheaston Bypass was built. Permission
was granted in 2001 for a replacement hall A
suitable site is likely to be sought in the Larkhall
area of Bath. |
|
Para
B3.23
now B3.32 |
B3.32/A |
Editorial to provide update |
The Council's Community Safety Action Plan
includes a proposal to support the development of youth
shelters and associated facilities as one means of reducing
nuisance and disorder. The grounds of the Youth Centre at
Peasedown St John has been identified as a suitable location
for both a youth shelter and a skateboard
facility. A youth shelter has now been installed. |
|
Para
B3.25
now B3.34 |
B3.34/A |
Editorial |
The Council will continue to monitor the
provision of all types of community meeting places and respond
positively where there is an acknowledged shortfall, where
possible identifying suitable sites. The availability of bus
services will be an important aspect of the monitoring
process. Planning permission for new, extensions to or
replacement community facilities will be determined against
the criteria set out in Policy CF.4 CF.2. |
|
Para
B3.32
now B3.41 |
B3.41/A |
578/B46 |
Similarly there is no middle-scale venue
(350 – 650) seats for contemporary performing arts,
especially dance, and lack of a centre for Cultural Cinema;.
Facilities at the emerging Old Bakery Community Arts Centre
in Radstock include artists studios and exhibition space, but and
no appropriate multi-professional arts facilities in
Norton-Radstock and Keynsham are otherwise limited. |
|
Para
B3.33
now B3.42 |
B3.42/A |
Editorial change |
These shortfalls in provision as outlined
above are identified in the Council’s Arts Strategy which
encourages their development and provision. Development
proposals for new and replacement arts facilities or
enhancement of existing facilities will be considered in the
context of Policy CF.4 CF.2 above or
Policy SR.7 if the proposal relates to commercial leisure
development. |
|
Para
B3.34
now B3.43 |
B3.43/A |
Editorial change |
Places of Worship provide an important
focal point for the local community and a base for a range of
other local activities. Although a number of churches and
chapels have closed for worship in recent decades, some
denominations have experienced an upsurge in congregation
sizes leading to alternative venues being sought to better
meet their requirements. The Council will support such
provision providing it is sensitively located so as not to be
detrimental to residential amenity and should meet the other
criteria in Policy CF.4 CF.2 and other
relevant policies in the Plan. |
|
Para B3.36 now B3.45 |
B3.45/A |
Editorial to provide update |
Library provision in the District is kept under review
through the Annual Library Plan. It is envisaged that the
libraries at Radstock and Moorland Road will need replacing in
the future but as yet there are no firm proposals. The mobile
library service is to be improved with the addition of another
vehicle and the review of existing routes.
A Library Vision has been agreed by the
Executive Member (March 2003) which aims to improve and extend
library facilities throughout the authority, and build on the
Department for Culture Media and Sport's plans for Libraries
as outlined in their document "Framework for the
Future". Our Vision is to ensure a balanced provision of
services in line with local population size and need,
particularly supporting areas with an identified and unmet
need. Therefore future developments with an impact on
demographics will have to be taken into account. Libraries
will work in partnership wherever possible to deliver
services, and are looking for co-location opportunities in all
areas. |
|
Para
B3.37
now B3.46 |
B3.46/A |
Editorial change |
Any proposals to relocate or replace a
library or for any other improvements to existing provision
will be supported. Planning applications will be considered
within the context of Policies CF.1 and CF.4 CF.2,
as appropriate. |
|
Para
B3.39
now B3.12 |
B3.12/A |
2310/B12, 2448/B1, 3146/B2, 2310/B3, 5005/B2, 5001/B97 |
When considering planning applications
involving the loss or change of use of buildings in community
use, it is crucial to ascertain whether an alternative
community use can be found for the land or building(s)
concerned. Policy CF.1 seeks to prevent the loss of valuable
community facilities. As an exception to this, current
Government guidance is advising Councils to consider disposing
of any school buildings surplus to requirements. Any loss to
the overall community provision, other than education, will be
taken into account when considering development proposals
involving the loss of education facilities (see also paras
B3.50-B3.54). |
|
Para
B3.41
now B3.47 |
B3.47/A
B3.47/B |
Editorial
Change arising from deletion of Site GDS.1/NR1 |
Land is allocated at Westfield under Policy
CF.4 to meet the known requirements for community facilities
where a suitable site has already been identified (see para B3.14
B3.23 above). Community facilities are
also proposed as part of the scheme proposed on land south of
Charlton Park, Midsomer Norton as set out in Policy GDS.1. |
|
Policy CF.1 |
CF.1/A
CF.1/B |
5010/B130
1899/B3, 2310/B3, 2310/B12, 5001/B99 |
Development involving the loss of
land or change of use of or change of use of land
or buildings presently used or last used for community
purposes will only be permitted where:
- it would not seriously affect the availability of
community facilities in the locality;
or and
- no suitable alternative community uses can be found for
the land or buildings in question; or
(iii) the proposal would result in the
provision of alternative facilities of equivalent community
benefit.
|
|
Policy CF.2 now Policy CF.4 |
CF.4/A |
578/B44 |
Land is allocated for the development of
community facilities on the following site:
Westfield, Norton-Radstock - Land south of
Waterford Park:
0.2 ha 0.83 ha for
provision of community uses including community hall and/or
recreational facilities, to include open space and equipped
play area (NEAP); account to be taken of the site's nature
conservation interests. |
|
Policy CF.2 now policy CF.4
PM Inset 19 |
CF.4/B |
578/B54 |
Extend existing community facility
allocation at Waterford Park, Westfield, to include the area
to the east under Policy CF.4.
|
|
Para
B3.44
now B3.50 |
B3.50/A |
Editorial |
There are currently five special schools
in the District with a further six special units attached to
mainstream primary and secondary schools. The Council's
Education Service is undertaking a review of special education
provision in the City of Bath. One outcome of this review may
be that a new site is required for a special school. Should
the Council’s Education Service identify any need to upgrade
or replace the existing provision in order to meet future
special educational requirements within the Plan period, then
any development proposals will be considered within the
context of Policy CF.4 CF.2. |
|
Para
B3.46
now B3.52 |
B3.52/A |
5001/B34 |
The Council’s Childcare Audit 2000–2001
has identified various areas of childcare need across the
District. Whilst existing local authority schools and
nurseries will be able to make up some of the shortfall in
provision, the Council will seek contributions for additional
provision or enhancement of existing provision in association
with new development proposals (see paras B3.72-B3.73
B3.18-B3.19 and Policy CF.6 CF.3). |
|
Para
B3.47
now B3.53 |
B3.53/A
|
578/B47, 716/B2
|
City of Bath College located in the centre
of Bath also provides full and part time further and higher
education courses. Similarly, Norton-Radstock College of
Further Education provides full and part-time courses in the
southern part of the District.
The Council’s Education Service is developing a
responsible for providing further education in its schools.
The service has developed a strategy for the provision of
education for 16-19 year olds across the District. The
strategy which is likely to lead to a review
of existing post-16 education. A possible outcome of this
review may mean that additional sites are required or that
existing sites are no longer used for post-16 education. |
|
New para B3.53A |
B3.53A/A |
578/B47, 716/B2 |
Further (and Higher) education is also
provided by the City of Bath College located in the centre of
Bath, plus Norton-Radstock College which has branches in
Norton-Radstock and Keynsham. Further Education Colleges
operate independently of the Council. During the Plan period,
it is possible that the Colleges will seek to dispose of
surplus accommodation and develop replacement facilities. |
|
Para
B3.48
now B3.54 |
B3.54/A |
2999/B1, 714/B6, 714/B7, 3309/B3
|
The University of Bath is a purpose built development
located on the outskirts of the City. It currently has 7,930
students. Its Campus is also home to the English Institute
of Sport (S.W.). Current and fFuture
plans for the University include the development of an
Institute for Sport, conference facilities, extended
academic facilities and further student residences. A Master
Plan and Transport Strategy for the site as well as an
assessment of the site’s environmental capacity was endorsed
by the Council in March 2001. |
|
New para B3.54A |
B3.54A/A |
2999/B1, 714/B6, 714/B7, 3309/B3
|
Future development as outlined in the Master Plan will not
meet the University’s expansion requirements for the whole
Local Plan period. Therefore, in order to enable its
expansion, the Green Belt boundary is proposed to be changed
and land is allocated on the eastern side of the campus for
University-related uses under Policy GDS.1. It is also
expected that a revised Master Plan should be prepared to
facilitate this development. |
|
Para B3.51 now B3.57 |
B3.57/A |
Editorial change |
This could result in educational establishments coming
forward with proposals to redevelop or expand their
facilities. In principle these will be supported provided the
proposals conform with Policy CF.4 CF.2
and other relevant policies in the Plan. Depending on the
specific nature of the scheme, the Council will encourage the
development of facilities that can be made available for wider
community use and will seek to prevent the loss of facilities
that are already being used for other community activities
e.g. for pre-school or meetings. |
|
Para
B3.54
now B3.60 |
B3.60/A |
Editorial |
New buildings for educational purposes should be designed
to high standards taking account of the surroundings in which
they are to be located. All proposals will need to meet the
criteria in Policy CF.4 CF.2 before
permission is granted. |
|
Para
B3.55
now B3.61 |
B3.61/A
B3.61/B |
Editorial change
1895/B3, 2314/B2, 5005/B1 |
The Council’s Education Service has identified the
improvements needed to existing primary school provision. Much
can be achieved on or within existing sites but for others,
additional land will be required. This mainly relates to
school building but in some cases, playing field provision is
required. Policy CF.3 CF.5 therefore
allocates land for this purpose where such a need has been
identified. However, it is acknowledged that particularly
in Bath, there is a shortage of land for development. Should a
site that is not allocated in Policy CF.5 come forward for the
development of educational facilities, it will be assessed
under Policy CF.2, together with other relevant Policies in
the Plan. |
|
Para
B3.56
now B3.62 |
B3.62/A |
1895/B1
|
The Council’s Education Service has undertaken a review
of primary school provision in the Radstock area. The
Education Committee has decided to replace Radstock Infant
School and Clandown CE Primary School with a new school in,
to be built on an identified site to the north of Woodborough
Lane, Radstock. Investigations into identifying an
appropriate site are underway. The Council has also
decided to merge St. Nicholas CE Infant School and St.
Nicholas CE Junior School creating a new primary school on the
current St. Nicholas Junior School site. |
|
New para B3.62A |
B3.62A/A |
5001/B101, 5005/B5
|
A need for a playing field to serve St Mary’s Primary
School in Bathwick has been identified by the Council, but
there are currently no suitable sites to locate such a
facility. However, should a site for a school playing field
come forward it can be considered against Policy CF.2 and
other relevant Local Plan policies. |
|
New para B3.62B |
B3.62B/A |
3250/B1 |
A new primary school is required in association with the
redevelopment of Western Riverside. Policy GDS.1 (general site
requirements, section B) requires that such provision is made.
The requirement is also amplified in the Western Riverside SPG. |
|
Policy CF.3 now Policy CF.5 |
CF.5/A
CF.5//B
CF.5/C
CF.5/D |
3304/B2, 3097/B1, 3304/B4, 3304/B5, 3312/B10
345/B28, 2993/B1, 2994/B1, 3049/B1, 3102/B1, 3104/B1
3259/B1 |
POLICY CF.3 CF.5
The following land is allocated for primary educational
purposes:
Bath
- Oldfield Park Junior, Claude Avenue: Reservation of 0.53
ha. to allow for extension.
- St John’s RC Primary, Oldfield Lane (0.74 ha.) and
Lymore Avenue Playing Field (1.84 ha.): Total reservation
of 2.58 ha. to allow for replacement school.
- St Andrew’s CE Primary, Northampton Buildings:
Reservation of 0.46 ha. to allow for extension.
- St Saviour’s Primary, Larkhall: Reservation of 0.1 ha.
to allow for extension.
Norton-Radstock
- Welton Primary: Reservation of 1.1 ha. to allow for
extension.
- St. Mary’s Primary, Writhlington: Reservation of 1.0
ha. to allow for provision of playing field.
6a Woodborough Lane: Reservation of 1.76 ha site to allow
for development of new Primary School.
Villages
- Camerton Primary: Reservation of 0.6 ha. to allow for
extension.
- Clutton Primary: Reservation of 0.6 ha. to allow for
extension.
- East Harptree Primary: Reservation of 0.25 ha. to allow
for provision of playing field.
- Farrington Gurney Primary: Reservation of 0.6 ha. to
allow for long-term replacement.
- Freshford Primary: Reservation of 0.3 ha. next to
existing school
to allow for extension for
provision of a playing field.
- High Littleton Primary: Reservation of 0.1 ha. to allow
for provision of playing field.
- Marksbury Primary: Reservation of 0.8 ha. to allow for
long
term replacement with new 85 place school site
extension.
- Pensford Primary: Reservation of 0.6 ha. to allow for
replacement school – flooding constraints to be
investigated.
- Shoscombe Primary: Reservation of 0.4 ha. to allow for
extension.
- Stanton Drew: Reservation of 0.4 ha. for new school of
80 places.
|
|
Policy CF.3 now Policy CF.5
PM Inset 19 |
CF.5/E |
3304/B2, 3097/B1, 3304/B4, 3304/B5, 3312/B10
|
Designate site at Woodborough Lane,
Radstock for development of a new primary school. |
|
Para
B3.57
now B3.63 |
B3.63/A |
746/B8, 746/B10 |
Health provision in the District is the
principally the responsibility of the Bath and North East
Somerset Primary Care Trust (PCT). The PCT is a statutory body
responsible for planning and providing local primary care
health services and many of the community services in B&NES
Bath & North East Somerset. The PCT operates in
partnership with the Council and other Trusts in the area,
including the Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Avon and
Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust and the Royal
National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases NHS Trust. There are
also numerous other charitable, voluntary and private health
care organisations that provide health care in the District. |
|
Para
B3.58
now B3.64 |
B3.64/A |
2987/B5 |
The Royal United Hospital (RUH) in Bath
serves a catchment area of 500,000 population. Services at
the RUH are provided by the RUH Bath NHS Trust. This acute
general hospital has an accident and emergency department and
14 surgical theatres. Hospital staff provide out-patient
services in eleven community hospitals including Paulton. |
|
Para
B3.61
now B3.67 |
B3.67/A |
Editorial update |
St Martins Hospital
provides physical and mental care for the elderly. During the
Plan period the hospital intends to transfer some of its
services to the Royal United Hospital, consolidating the
remaining on part of the existing site. Part of the site is
thus allocated for a mixed-use development under Policy GDS.1. |
|
Para
B3.64
now B3.70 |
B3.70/A |
578/B48 |
Bath has a comprehensive range of health
care services to cater for its inhabitants and beyond. There
are four NHS dental clinics in Norton-Radstock and is
a health clinic in Keynsham. A dental clinic in
Radstock and bBoth towns also have group
practice doctor’s surgeries. The rural areas are served by
practices in a number of the larger settlements or travel to
Bath and the towns. Chemists and dentists are available in the
towns and larger villages whilst opticians are represented
primarily in Bath, Keynsham and Norton-Radstock. |
|
Para
B3.76
now B3.71 |
B3.71/A |
Editorial change |
As with other community facilities health
care facilities are an important local resource and their loss
should be resisted unless there is no longer a demonstrable
need for the particular facility or service (Policy CF.1). The
increase in residential development may put pressure on
existing resources and result in the need for additional
facilities. With Social Services working more closely with the
Health Authority there may be opportunities for the joint use
of buildings and sites. Proposals for new health care
facilities will be considered under Policy CF.4
CF.2. |
|
Para
B3.68
now B3.16 |
B3.16/A |
120/B99 |
Favourable consideration will be given to
the land and/or building’s capacity for accommodating
more than one use or activity depending on the nature of the
proposal and the Council will encourage management agreements
that facilitate this. |
|
Para
B3.69
now B3.17 |
B3.17/A |
Editorial changes |
Policy CF.4 CF.2
sets out criteria against which proposals for community
facilities will be considered. Any proposals in the Green Belt
will be considered in the context of Policies GB.1 and GB.2.
Policy CF.5 CF.3 deals with the issue
of developer contributions |
|
Policy CF.4 now Policy CF.2 |
CF.2/A |
2597/B5
|
A. Development
of community facilities will be permitted provided they are
within or well related to a settlement defined in Policy
SC.1, or in the case of existing facilities outside such
settlements, they are well related to existing buildings.
Development outside the limits of the
urban areas or settlements will only be permitted where they
cannot be accommodated elsewhere and they are in locations
well related to public transport services.
B. Development of community facilities
which cannot be accommodated in accordance with Part A
will only be permitted in locations that are accessible by
a range of transport modes.
|
|
Para
B3.76
now B3.75 |
B3.75/A |
2604/B3 |
In a changing economic climate many pubs
may be also able to provide additional community facilities or
services such as a cash back facility, and public information
and Information Technology (IT) access. In order to
The Council is able to exercise some control to ensure
a public houses are is
not lost to another uses, especially if it is the only one in
the settlement or locality. , any pProposals
for their redevelopment or change of use will be considered
against Policy CF.7. |
|
Policy CF.7 |
CF.7/A |
721/B21, 686/B80
|
Development which results in the loss of a
public house, especially where it is the only one in the
village or locality, and any ancillary building with a
potential community use, will only be permitted where:
- the business is genuinely non-viable and every
reasonable attempt to market the premises as a public
house has been made; and either
- the proposed new use can provide equivalent or greater
alternative community benefit as part of the scheme.
ii) development would result in the
provision of alternative facilities of equivalent or greater
community benefit; or
iii) it would not seriously affect the
availability of community facilities in the locality.
|
|
Para
B3.77
now B3.76 |
B3.76/A |
578/B51 |
The nine statutory allotments in Bath,
together with those at Haydon Radstock Road
in Midsomer Norton, are complemented by other
non-statutory allotments scattered throughout the District.
Bath, Keynsham and Norton-Radstock currently have the highest
concentration of allotments. There are also a few in private
ownership. |
|
Para
B3.80
now B3.79 |
B3.79/A |
120/B100, 686/B81, 1269/B4, 3116/B1, 3123/B1, 3257/B9,
3299/B19 |
Policy CF.8 sets out the Council's approach
to the retention of existing allotments and
encourages the provision of new allotment sites should demand
increase during the Plan period unless otherwise allowed in
the Plan. Development involving the loss of an existing or
vacant allotment will only be permitted where its importance
outweighs the community value of the site as an allotment.
Developers will also be required to provide equivalent
replacement allotments on land that is suitable for
horticultural use. New and replacement allotments should be in
accessible locations (i.e. within 1000 metres of the majority
of their potential users). |
|
Policy CF.8 |
CF.8/A
CF.8/B |
686/B81, 3116/B1, 3123/B1, 3257/B9, 3299/B19, 1269/B4,
120/B100
564/B37 (Local..)
|
Development on or affecting land in
allotment use or, if vacant, last used for allotments
including those shown on the Proposals Map will not be
permitted unless:
(i) the importance of the development
outweighs the community value of the site as an allotment
and suitable, equivalent, alternative provision is made;
or
(ii) the site is proposed for another
use in the Local Plan.
New or replacement allotments will be
permitted provided they are in accessible locations. |
|
Policy CF.8
PM Inset 31 |
CF.8/C
|
3235/B1 |
Allocate land north of King George’s Rd as allotment.
Delete allotment allocation on land to the west of this site,
but retain its designation as a Visually Important Open Space.
|
|
Policy CF.8
PM Inset 31 |
CF.8/D |
5001/B180 |
Designate St. Stephen’s Allotments under Policy CF.8.
(Distinguish St. Stephen’s Allotments from the Millennium
Green).
|
|
Policy CF.8
PM Inset 31 |
CF.8/E |
2324/B3 |
Designate the Larkhall Allotments under
Policy CF.8 |
|
Policy CF.8
PM Inset 31c |
CF.8/F |
580/B20 |
Delete western part of the 'Allotment’
designation at Hodshill, South Stoke. |
|
Para
B3.85
now B3.84 |
B3.84/A |
5014/B2 |
Investigations suggest the cemeteries at Batheaston,
Timsbury and Whitchurch may reach capacity by the end of the
Plan period, although the proposed extension to Haycombe
cemetery will be able to meet projected needs. |