MATRIX OF RESULTS
| STRATEGY:
S1 |
Appraisal
Criteria
Link to
Introduction |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
Minerals
and waste considered separately in this instance. |
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
++
|
Reduces
the need to travel, promotes non-car modes of transport, increases
viability of public transport and enables walking/cycling to
facilities and work. |
Consistent
with principles of the Local Transport Plan Vision, which promotes
access and reduced levels of travel. |
| Economy and Employment: Will the strategy promote
economic growth, employment and a diverse economy? |
++
|
Mixed use developments likely to include employment uses.
Housing close to employment will attract people to the area. Will
benefit sustainable local economy. Greater mix of housing will help
to widen the skills base within the District. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
++
|
Mixed uses
and higher densities within/close to centres will enhance their
viability and vitality. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
Mixed development
=
Density
++
|
Encouragement of mixed uses likely to have neutral impact in
terms of conserving/reducing consumption of minerals and waste
production. May make waste collection more complex.
Higher densities means less
materials used in development e.g. for roads etc. Higher densities
also make combined heat and power schemes, which recover energy
from waste, viable.
|
Link
between combined heat and power and appropriate density levels
should be made clear. |
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air?
|
++
|
Strategy
promotes better air quality by reducing the need to travel and
enabling the provision of sustainable modes of travel i.e. public
transport, walking and cycling. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
+?
|
Higher
density development could lead to a reduced amount of land under
hard surfaces, therefore, reducing the amount of run-off and less
wastage of water. |
The re-use
and recycling of water within developments should be
promoted. |
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
++
|
Higher
densities will reduce the area of land needed for development.
Mixed uses can make better use of land. |
|
| STRATEGY: S1
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
++
|
Strategy
will reduce the need to travel and therefore, should reduce
transport energy consumption. Energy use in buildings could be
reduced dependent on design.
Higher density will increase
viability of CHP schemes.
|
|
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+
|
Mixed
development should result in facilities being more accessible. This
should improve peoples quality of life. Reduces the need to
travel, which is often stressful. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
+
|
Mixed uses
results in a greater level of surveillance 24 hours a day.
Positive impact is heavily
influenced by design of development.
|
The
inclusion of residential uses in the mix, which results in greater
surveillance, could be made explicit. |
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
?
|
Impact is
dependent on design.
Increased densities/mixed uses could
improve access for more people to recreational
opportunities.
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
?
|
Impact is
dependent on development sites/design. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
?
|
Impact is
dependent on development sites/design. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
?
|
Impact is
dependent on development sites/design. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
+
|
There is
already much low-density development within the District, promoting
higher density development should help to increase the mix of
accommodation which is available. |
Housing
mix and tenures needs to be made explicit (although note
S3). |
| STRATEGY:
S2 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
+
|
By
providing land in the "right place" the strategy should ensure that
development is highly accessible by variety of transport
modes. |
Strategy
should specify that the "right place" includes reducing the need to
travel, in order to be consistent with Local Transport Plan
objectives. |
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
++
|
Strategy
seeks to provide land for employment development. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
+?
|
The
right place could mean directing development to
centres, which would ensure that facilities are accessible and
would enhance the centres themselves. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air?
|
+
|
Providing
land in the right place should reduce the need to
travel and impact positively on air quality. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
?
|
Providing
enough land likely to have a neutral impact or could be
negative as enough might imply high land take. Positive
impact could result dependent on the right place ensuring best
quality agricultural land is avoided and brownfield sites are used.
However, use of land is negative in relation to this
criterion. |
The term
enough land is unclear and could imply high levels of
land take. Better wording might be minimum land
necessary. |
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
+
|
Land in
the right place reduces the need to travel resulting in
a positive impact on the use of energy in the transport
sector. |
|
| STRATEGY: S2
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
++
|
Providing
access for all to jobs, housing and facilities will improve
peoples quality of life. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
?
|
If
facilities includes providing enough land for open
space then should be positive impact. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
=/+
|
Right place presumably means avoiding areas of high
landscape value. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
=/+
|
Right place presumably means avoiding areas of high
nature conservation value. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
++
|
Strategy
seeks to ensure enough land is available to provide everyone with
access to housing. |
|
|
STRATEGY: S3
|
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
+
|
Living
over the shop initiative will reduce the need to
travel. |
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
++
|
Provision
of affordable housing will help diversify the skills base within
the District.
Renovation/conversion of existing
properties will provide for a greater range of local
work than new build housing.
|
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
+
|
Living
over the shop initiatives will enhance all day activity within centres. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
+
|
Bringing
empty properties back into use and encouraging living over the shop
reduces the need to use new materials. Affordable housing may be
built at higher densities. |
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
+
|
Living
over the shop element of the strategy will reduce the need to
travel impacting positively on air quality. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
+
|
Re-use of
empty properties reduces the need to use greenfield land, as could
housing if it is built at higher densities. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
+
|
Living
over the shop reduces the need to travel. Re-use of existing
properties uses less energy than new build. |
|
| STRATEGY: S3
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
++
|
Primary
requirement of health is shelter, which this strategy achieves by
providing affordable accommodation to those in housing
need. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
=
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
=
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
=
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
+
|
Bringing
empty properties/floors above shops back into use should improve
the townscape. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
++
|
This is a housing related strategy. |
|
| STRATEGY:
S4 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
++
|
Reduces
the need to travel. |
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
+
|
Employment
sites will be more attractive to potential employers/investors as
they are well related to housing. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
+
|
The
strategy is likely to mean that some housing will be located in the
centres, therefore, leading to increased all day
activity in the centres and use of facilities /
services. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
++
|
This
strategy will reduce the need to travel impacting positively on air
quality. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=
|
|
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
++
|
This
strategy will reduce the need to travel thus reducing energy
consumption within the transport sector. |
|
| STRATEGY: S4
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
++
|
Improves
air quality and should provide better access to facilities
improving the quality of life. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
+
|
Partly
dependent on design. Relating housing well to facilities/services
should mean greater use of facilities resulting in increased
surveillance. |
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
+
|
Improved
residents access to open space / recreational
opportunities. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
=
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
=
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
+
|
By
providing housing well related to workplaces, facilities etc. this
strategy ensures that policies will best meet the overall housing
needs of the district in a range of locations. |
|
| STRATEGY:
S5 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
The
strategy proposes to carry out a study of the local economy, which
will feed into policy formulation. Therefore likely to benefit
economy criterion. |
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
=
|
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
++
|
The study
referred to in the strategy is concerned with identifying the
location and amount of land required for economic development
during the plan period, thereby promoting the local
economy. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
=
|
|
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
=
|
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=
|
|
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S5
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
=
|
|
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
=
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
=
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
=
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S6 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
+
|
Reduces
the need for rural residents to travel for employment and
services. |
Development should be encouraged in appropriate locations
consistent with reducing the need to travel and with the potential
to support rural transport services in accordance with Local
Transport Plan objectives. |
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
++
|
Provides
employment opportunities in rural areas and also outlets for local
crafts by bringing tourists into the area. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
++
|
Strategy
will help to secure the viability of local shops and services
benefiting village centres by bringing tourists and supporting
business in rural areas. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
+
|
Strategy
encourages the re-use of existing buildings helping to conserve
mineral resources. |
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air?
|
+?
|
The
strategy could reduce the need for people in rural areas to travel
to work places in urban areas by providing local employment
therefore reducing the need to travel. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
+/-
|
Strategy
encourages the re-use of existing buildings. Capacity of farmers to
stay and manage the land and maintain its quality is increased.
Provision of new sites in rural areas has negative
impact. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
+/-?
|
Potentially reduction in rural residents travelling to work in
urban areas.
Use of renewable energy by rural
enterprise might be encouraged.
Opportunities for sustainable
tourism could lead to increased travel from urban areas leading to
increased energy use.
|
|
| STRATEGY: S6
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+
|
More
employment opportunities in rural areas could enhance health and
quality of life through a reduction in rural poverty. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
+/-?
|
Security/safety on farms could be improved as a result of
activity.
Road safety could be adversely
affected due to increased traffic levels.
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
+
|
Opportunities for sustainable tourism will provide access to
the countryside. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
+
|
Improving
the viability of farms increases the management of landscapes
(particularly landscape character influenced by agricultural/human
activity). Issue of new building design in sensitive rural
landscapes. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
+/-?
|
There
could be some loss of habitats e.g. barns used by barn owls.
Strategy might provide opportunities for improved management of
wildlife sites. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
+?
|
Provides
opportunities to improve derelict sites. However impact is
dependent on design. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
-?
|
Strategy
could lead to the loss of rural accommodation for local people i.e.
through gentrification or use of dwellings/other buildings for
holiday lets. |
|
| STRATEGY:
S7 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
+
|
Increased
local provision should reduce the need to travel and increase
accessibility. |
Strategy
should stipulate that provision should be accessible to the area of
identified need to reduce the need to travel and in order to be
consistent with the Local Transport Plan. |
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
++
|
Recreation
and leisure is a significant employment industry. Good leisure
facilities and access to open spaces will help to create an
attractive environment thereby attracting business and benefiting
the economy. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
+/-?
|
Beneficial
impact if a leisure facility is located within the centre; negative
if it is out of town. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air?
|
+/-
|
Open space
provision will be beneficial in terms of the pollution absorption
capacity of vegetation.
Buildings such as Sports Centres
will have a negative impact.
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
-
|
Increased
hard standing/buildings will increase run-off leading to water
wastage. Recreation/ leisure facility will use water e.g. toilet
blocks, swimming pools etc. |
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=
|
|
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
+?
|
The need
to travel could be reduced through the provision of local
facilities. |
|
| STRATEGY: S7
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
++
|
Provides
opportunities for recreation benefiting health. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=/?
|
Could
result in increased activity in the evenings. |
Role of
design in safety/security should be covered in the
Plan. |
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
++
|
Strategy
related to open space/recreation provision. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
?
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
?
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
+
|
Open space
may improve the quality of the townscape including open areas
within development providing opportunities for landscape
treatment. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S8 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
+
|
Retaining
and promoting mixed uses and the dual use of school facilities
should reduce the need to travel. |
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
++
|
Strategy
safeguards suitable existing employment sites. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
++
|
This
strategy safeguards existing uses / facilities including those in
city and town centres. In addition it promotes mixed uses which can
enhance vitality and viability of centres. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
+
|
Retention
of existing facilities means that there is less need for materials
for new build.
Neutral impact in terms of waste
criterion.
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air?
|
?
|
Allowing
mixed uses may help to improve air quality. Existing sites, which
are to be retained, may be polluting, although this could mean that
it isnt suitable in that location and a change allowed for
under the strategy. The relocation of uses, which may occur without
a safeguarding policy, may be to more or less sustainable locations
in terms of travel distances. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
+
|
Retention
of existing uses as well as the re-use of some previously developed
sites reduces the amount of greenfield land needed for
development. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
?
|
Energy use
in construction may be reduced. However inefficient energy users
may also be retained. |
|
| STRATEGY: S8
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+?
|
Allowing
redevelopment of a site where the existing use is unsuitable may
promote the safeguarding of public health. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
+?
|
Allowing
mixed uses as well as redeveloping sites where an existing use is
unsuitable may help to create safer environments. |
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
+
|
This
strategy safeguards existing open space, however it does not
contribute to the creation of new open space. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
+?
|
Indirect
positive impact as protecting existing sites reduces the need for
new build. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
+?
|
Indirect
positive impact as protecting existing sites reduces the need for
new build. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S9 |
| Appraisal Criteria |
Overall Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other
Council Strategies / Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
The
strategy proposes to carry out a retail study of the City, which
will feed into policy formulation. Therefore could benefit economy,
vitality and viability of centres criteria. |
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
=
|
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
+?
|
The
outcome of the study proposed by the strategy should benefit the
local economy. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
+?
|
The
outcome of the proposed study should benefit the City Centre. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
=
|
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=
|
|
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S9
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
=
|
|
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
=
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
=
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
=
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S10 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
++
|
The
strategy reduces the need to travel by promoting mixed uses in city
and town centres where public transport accessibility is highest
and encourages local provision increasing access to facilities by
walking and cycling. |
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
++
|
The
strategy seeks to secure the viability and vitality of centres
benefiting the local economy. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
++
|
See local
economy comment. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
++
|
The
promotion of mixed uses within the city and town centres, which are
well served by public transport, and local provision will help to
reduce the need to travel and increase the opportunity to travel by
means other than the car. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
+?
|
The
strategy could have an indirect positive impact by protecting the
critical retail function of the city and town centres as it reduces
the likelihood of out of town retail development. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
++
|
See air
quality comments. |
|
| STRATEGY: S10
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+
|
Reduced
need to travel will improve air quality and therefore benefit
public health. Local provision should encourage more walking and
cycling. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
+
|
Mixed uses
will help create 24-hour activity within the city and town centres
therefore increasing natural surveillance. |
The
strategy should refer to the possibility of enhancing 24-hour
activity. |
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
=
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
=
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
=
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
+
|
The
strategy will help to promote the viable use of buildings in the
centre, which enables conservation of buildings.
Impact of new development on
townscape is design influenced.
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S11 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council
Strategies |
| General
Comments: |
|
The
strategy proposes to work with higher education establishments in
the District to assess their needs. This will feed into future
policy formulation. |
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
=
|
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
=
|
|
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
=
|
|
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
=
|
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=
|
|
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S11
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
=
|
|
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
=
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
=
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
=
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S12 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
Clarification is required as to what would constitute
overriding need for development. |
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
=
|
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
+/-
|
Development is to be located where it has economic benefits.
Improving the quality of the environment will indirectly benefit
the economy via the attractiveness of the area. Conversely, if
policies resulting from this strategy are restrictive it could lead
to economic development being turned away. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
+?
|
Locating
development where it has economic and social benefits should
benefit / enhance the city and town centres. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
+
|
The
strategy should have a beneficial impact as it steers development
to locations where it enhances the environment. Air quality is part
of the environment. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
+
|
See
comment for air quality water is also part of the
environment. |
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
+
|
See
comment for air quality. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S12
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+?
|
The
strategy helps to safeguard and improve the environment. Enhancing
and thus creating a more pleasant environment and improving mental
health i.e. Making people happier. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
=
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
++
|
The
strategy aims to locate development where it would enhance the
environment and if necessary to provide compensatory measures.
Therefore it seeks to make a positive impact. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
++
|
See
comment for landscape. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
++
|
Assuming
that environment includes the built environment, the strategy will
have a positive impact. |
Strategy
should be clarified by referring to the natural and built
environment. |
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S13 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
=
|
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
+?
|
Possible
benefit to the economy from increased energy efficiency, which
reduces costs. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
=
|
|
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
++
|
The
strategy aims to protect natural resources. |
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
++
|
The
strategy aims to protect air quality. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
++
|
The
strategy aims to protect water quality. |
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
++
|
The
strategy aims to protect soil. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
++
|
The
strategy encourages renewable energy schemes and greater energy
efficiency. |
|
| STRATEGY: S13
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+
|
Avoiding
pollution benefits health. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
=
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
+/-
|
Protecting
natural resources should mean a positive impact. Landscape could be
radically changed by provision for renewable energy
schemes. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
++
|
The
strategy aims to protect biodiversity. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S14 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
=
|
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
=
|
|
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
=
|
|
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
=
|
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
++
|
The
strategy seeks to ensure that development avoids floodplains. Also
treatment of contaminated land will improve water
quality. |
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
++
|
The
strategy conserves important land and soil resources by
safeguarding floodplains. Treatment of contaminated and unstable
land will also be beneficial. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S14
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
++
|
Self
evident from the strategy. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
++
|
Self
evident from the strategy. |
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
=
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
+
|
The
strategy will help to maintain the landscape character of
floodplains. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
+
|
The
strategy will help to maintain the nature conservation interests in
floodplains. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S15 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
+
|
Should
reduce the need to transport waste elsewhere (i.e. To landfill
sites). |
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
++
|
The
strategy should help to create new business, which will benefit the
local economy. Recovery of materials and energy from waste will
provide jobs and attract business. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
=
|
|
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
++
|
Self
evident from this waste related strategy. |
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
?
|
This
strategy promotes the reuse of waste, but also the recovery of
energy from waste, which probably involves incineration. The effect
on air quality is therefore uncertain. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
+
|
The
strategy seeks to minimise environmental impacts, which should
benefit / minimise damage to water resources. |
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
+
|
Damage to
land and soil should be minimised. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
+
|
The
strategy promotes the recovery of energy from waste. Reduces energy
consumption via minimising waste production and promoting its
re-use. However, recycling may be costly in terms of energy
usage. |
|
| STRATEGY: S15
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+?
|
Should
result in less waste and fewer problems arising from
environmentally damaging disposal. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
+?
|
Should
result in less waste and fewer problems arising from
environmentally damaging disposal. |
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
=
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
=
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
+?
|
Reduced
level of waste in the environment might help to maintain nature
conservation interests. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S16 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
=
|
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
+ /
-
|
The
strategy might be restrictive to quarry operators therefore leading
to a negative impact. Positive impact in that it maintains an
attractive environment and seeks satisfactory after-use, which
provides jobs / better opportunities for employment use than a
derelict site. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
=
|
|
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
++
|
Self
evident from the strategy. |
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
= /
+
|
Minimising
adverse impacts and requiring satisfactory after-use protects air
and water quality. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
= /
+
|
See
comment for air quality. |
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
+
|
Strategy
conserves soil resources. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S16
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
=
|
|
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
+?
|
A
hazardous site may be made safer through restoration and
satisfactory after-use. |
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
=
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
+
|
Conserves
resources and therefore landscapes and also seeks to ensure
restoration and satisfactory after-use which should help maintain
landscape character. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
+
|
The
strategy seeks to minimise adverse impacts and restore to
satisfactory after use. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S17 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
=
|
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
+ /
-
|
An
attractive environment benefits the local economy therefore
positive impact. Listed building requirements can impose added
costs on business therefore resulting in a negative
impact. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
+ /
-
|
Protection
of listed buildings and the World Heritage Site is important to the
continued success of Bath Centre in particular. However requirement
can be restrictive. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
=
|
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
+
|
Some
designated sites are streams and rivers therefore the strategy will
maintain their quality. |
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
+
|
Strategy
protects some land and soil through protecting statutorily
designated sites. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S17
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council
Strategies |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+
|
Protecting
a pleasant environment increases feelings of
well-being. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
+
|
The
strategy protects open spaces with regard to the Areas of
Outstanding Natural Beauty. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
++
|
Self
evident from the strategy. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
++
|
Self
evident from the strategy. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
++
|
Self
evident from the strategy. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S18 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
=
|
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
+ /
-
|
Attractive
environment benefits the local economy. However the strategy could
be restrictive and impose additional costs on business. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
+ /
-
|
See
comment for local economy. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
=
|
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
+
|
Where
locally valued feature is a water feature then strategy will have a
beneficial impact. |
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=
|
|
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S18
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+
|
Benefit to
feeling of well-being by conserving local distinctiveness /
character. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
+
|
Locally
valued sites and areas to be conserved include open
space. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
++
|
Self-evident from the strategy i.e. Conserves and enhances the
natural and built environment. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
++
|
Self
evident from the strategy. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
++
|
Self
evident from the strategy. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S19 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
=
|
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
+ /
-
|
Attractive
environment benefits the local economy. However the strategy could
be restrictive and impose additional costs on business. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
+
|
Visual
improvement in centres could improve the level of
activity. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
=
|
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=
|
|
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S19
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+?
|
Possible
indirect benefit. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
+
|
The
strategy would maintain and improve the appearance of open
space. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
++
|
Improving
degraded landscapes is clearly a positive impact. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
-?
|
Impact
depends upon the kind of visual improvement. It could lead to a
decline in biodiversity |
Refer to
visual improvement should not adversely affect nature conservation
interests. |
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
++
|
The
strategy conserves and enhances local character and distinctiveness
presumably in the built environment. |
Clarify
this by referring to both the natural and built
environment. |
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S20 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
Impacts
depend on the detail for each site put forward in development
briefs. |
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
?
|
Potentially positive although dependent on the development
brief or the individual scheme which could include for example
pedestrian and cycle links. |
Further
guidance should draw on, and link to, the Local Transport
Plan. |
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
=
|
|
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
?
|
Potentially positive impact through creating a better
environment, in turn increasing activity. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
=
|
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
?
|
If the
development briefs referred to set out requirements on for example
run-off management then the impact will be positive. |
Could
specify the need to promote water resource management through
development briefs. |
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
?
|
|
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
?
|
The
strategy could have a positive impact, but it is dependent upon the
development brief and the design of a scheme. |
Could
specify the need to promote energy efficiency through development
briefs. |
| STRATEGY: S20
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
?
|
The
strategy could have a positive impact, but it is dependent upon the
development brief and the design of a scheme. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
?
|
The
strategy could have a positive impact, but it is dependent upon the
development brief and the design of a scheme. |
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
?
|
The
strategy could have a positive impact, but it is dependent upon the
development brief and the design of a scheme. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
?
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
?
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
+
|
Future
development should reflect the best aspects of existing character,
therefore giving a positive impact. |
Specifying
the need to set high or higher standards of design could increase
positive impact. |
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S21 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
++
|
Strategy
improves accessibility by choice of means and reduces the need to
travel. Also stipulates need for green transport plans.
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
+
|
Improves
access for all to employment. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
++
|
Improved
access by various modes of transport and improved safety should
enhance vitality of centres. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
= |
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
++
|
Reduced
traffic emissions improves air quality. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=
|
|
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
++
|
Strategy
seeks to minimise transport energy use. |
|
| STRATEGY: S21
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
++
|
Beneficial
impact on air quality, in turn improves or safeguards public
health. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
++
|
Reduced
traffic and safe access for pedestrians and cyclists improves road
safety. |
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
+
|
Strategy
improves access to facilities by a variety of means. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
=
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
=
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S22 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
+/-?
|
Limiting
choice by discouraging car parking. However, impact should be
positive as discouraging car use and encouraging accessibility by
alternative means of transport. |
Ensure
alternative means of access are in place before limiting car
parking. Link to parking strategy in Local Transport
Plan. |
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
-/+
|
Employers
may not locate in an area without high levels of car parking.
Reducing car use/congestion may encourage people back into centres. |
Ensure
alternative means of access are in place before limiting car
parking. |
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
+/-
|
Reducing
congestion could attract people back into centres. Conversely lack
of car parking may act as a deterrent. |
Ensure
alternative means of access are in place before limiting car
parking. |
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
+
|
Impact
should be positive as the strategy encourages alternative modes /
discourages car use. However, may displace the problem
spatially. |
Introduce
wider parking control strategies to prevent the displacement of
parking into residential areas. |
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=
|
|
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
+
|
See air
quality comment. |
|
| STRATEGY: S22
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
?
|
Impact of
strategy depends on public transport provision and its
use. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
?
|
Impact of
strategy dependent on use and provision of alternative means of
transport to the car less car parking could lead to people
undertaking a hazardous journey to work on foot/by
bicycle. |
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
=
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
=
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
?
|
If the
strategy reduces air pollution it could be of benefit in nature
conservation terms. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
+?
|
Reduces
the amount of land taken for car parking and enables more
innovative designs to be implemented. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S23 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
This
strategy addresses three different issues. The following three
elements are considered separately:
- Provision of recreation facilities
in urban fringe areas and other easily accessible
locations.
- Improving the Public Rights of Way
network and access to it.
- Introducing traffic management
measures to country lanes.
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
+
|
Improves
access to recreation opportunities by various means in urban and
rural areas. |
Provision
of small scale visitor amenities in the countryside should protect
from adverse impact of excessive traffic as in the Local Transport
Plan. |
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
1. +
2. +
3. =
|
More
attractive/accessible environment may benefit economy. Increasing
recreation opportunities can provide jobs.
Increased use of
countryside/provision of visitor centres benefits rural economy for
example bringing increased trade to village shops.
|
Link
improvements to recreational access / opportunities to possibility
of improving support for rural facilities such as bus services,
shops and pubs. |
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
1. +
2. +
3. =
|
Positive
impact on use of local urban centres.
Benefits village centres through
increased activity and trade in local shops.
|
Link
improvements to recreational access / opportunities to possibility
of improving support for rural facilities such as bus services,
shops and pubs. |
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air?
|
1. +
2. =
3. =
|
Improves
access by various means, potentially reduces car use. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S23
Continued |
|
Appraisal
Criteria
|
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
1. +
2. =
3. =
|
Reduces
transport energy use in travelling to open space. |
|
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
++
|
Improves
access to open space and the countryside beneficial impact
in terms of increased exercise. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
1. +
2. +
3. +
|
Makes
journeys to open space easier/safer. Increased usage of open space
increases security.
Leads to higher use of footpaths and
reduces use of roads. Walkers wont get caught in brambles
etc.
Improves road safety.
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
1. ++
2. ++
3. +
|
Improves
quality of and access to open space and countryside. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
1. =
2. =
3. -
|
Traffic calming measures likely to
harm visual appearance of landscape.
|
Ensure
that traffic management measures would not adversely affect
landscape. |
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
1. ?
2. -
3. ?
|
Impact not
known dependent on type of recreational facilities.
Draining bridleways and surfacing
paths has a negative impact, as does increased usage due to
disturbance of wildlife.
If resulted in closure of roads to
vehicular traffic then could lead to less disturbance and fewer
road kills.
|
Ensure
that traffic management measures would not adversely affect nature
conservation interests. |
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S24 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
+/-
|
Strategy
promotes access by variety of means of transport, however, it
discourages car use which limits choice. |
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
?
|
|
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
?
|
Aim of
second part of strategy (pedestrianisation/traffic calming) is to
benefit centres, however, traders argue such schemes have a
negative impact on trade. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
+
|
Strategy
discourages car use via traffic management measures and
reallocating road space in some areas. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=
|
|
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
+/-
|
Traffic
management measures and reallocation of road space discourage car
use. However, traffic calming schemes can increase car energy/fuel
use via acceleration and deceleration. |
|
| STRATEGY: S24
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council
Strategies |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+
|
Overall
strategy should be beneficial in terms of positive impact on air
quality and road safety. However, traffic calming may present a
problem for emergency services. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
+
|
See above
comment re: road safety |
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
+
|
Could
improve safety of access to existing open space and create
potential for play provision within calmed streets. |
Include
safety of access to open space and play space for
children. |
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
+?
|
Reallocation of road space may lead to landscape
improvement. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
=
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
+
|
Dependent
on individual schemes the strategy should improve the quality of
the built environment. Impact of cars on historic buildings should
be reduced. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S25 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
++
|
Self
evident from the strategy, which aims to improve pedestrian/cycle,
access to facilities. |
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
+
|
Makes area
more attractive for employees by improving links, which should
benefit the local economy. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
+
|
Strategy
should have a positive impact as it improves access by variety of
means which should help increase activity. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
+?
|
Potentially positive impact if it leads to a reduction in car
use. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
-?
|
Could be
negative as may take virgin land to provide cycle
routes e.g.: the Chew Valley National Cycle Network
route. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
+?
|
See air
quality comment. |
|
| STRATEGY: S25
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
++
|
Strategy
encourages walking/cycling which provides healthy
exercise. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
++
|
Safe
cycling/pedestrian routes will result from this
strategy. |
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
+/-
|
Strategy
aims to improve access to open space. However, it may take land
from open space uses. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
-?
|
Could be
negative as may take virgin land with landscape
interest to provide cycle routes e.g.: the Chew Valley National
Cycle Network route. |
Ensure
that these do not adversely affect landscape interests. |
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
-?
|
Could be
negative as may take virgin land with nature
conservation interest to provide cycle routes e.g.: the Chew Valley
National Cycle Network route. |
Ensure
that these do not adversely affect nature conservation
interests. |
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S26 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
The
strategy proposes studies into existing road proposals. Impacts
will be dependent upon the outcome of these studies. |
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
=
|
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
=
|
|
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
=
|
|
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
=
|
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=
|
|
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S26
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
=
|
|
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
=
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
=
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
=
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S27 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
+
|
Improves access by means other than the car i.e.: walking,
cycling and possibly rail (recreational). |
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
+?
|
Recreational railway use could benefit the local economy i.e.:
provides jobs. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
+?
|
Strategy
could increase the use of centres by encouraging access by means
other than the car. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
=
|
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=
|
|
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S27
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+
|
Recreational use of railway routes will benefit health through
providing opportunities for exercise. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
?
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
++
|
Improves
access to recreational resource. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
?
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
-?
|
Increased
use for recreation may harm nature conservation
interests. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
+
|
Strategy
ensures that an historical rail line, which may be part of a built
heritage, is retained. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S28 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
++
|
Directing
development to sites within the existing urban area should maximise
accessibility by various means of transport, in particular public
transport. |
Link to
Local Transport Plan objectives for the City of Bath. |
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
++
|
Strategy
relates to accommodating employment development, which will benefit
the local economy in particular that of Bath. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
++
|
Directs
development to Bath, which should generate significant benefits for
the City centre. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air?
|
?
|
Strategy
aims to reduce the need to travel, particularly by car, which would
have a positive impact. Accommodating employment development within
Bath could have a negative impact dependent on type of industry.
Increased congestion may result from the strategy, which would have
a negative impact. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
+
|
Strategy
steers development to brownfield sites reducing loss of greenfield
sites. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
+?
|
Aims to
reduce the need to travel, therefore, positive impact. However,
increased congestion may result in increased energy
use. |
|
| STRATEGY: S28
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
=
|
|
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
+
|
Strategy
aims to protect and enhance open space in the city. Developing
brownfield sites reduces pressure to develop open
space. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
+
|
Indirect
benefit of protecting greenfield sites, and therefore, landscape
interests, in rural areas. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
?
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
+
|
Strategy
should lead to the improvement of derelict sites. Impact heavily
dependent on design of new development. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
++
|
Strategy
will work towards meeting housing needs of the
District. |
|
| STRATEGY:
S29 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
+/?
|
Development of Keynsham will be accessible by a choice of means
of transport (positive impact). However, in terms of reducing the
need to travel the impact is uncertain. |
Link to
Local Transport Plan vision and objectives for the Districts
towns. |
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
++
|
Strategy
considers provision of land for employment purposes benefiting the
local economy. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
++
|
Strategy
should benefit Keynsham town centre through potential increases in
activity. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
?
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
?
|
Directing
development to Keynsham with its excellent public transport links
is intended to reduce car use and therefore, benefit air quality.
However, questionable whether this will happen. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
?
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
-
|
Development on fringes of Keynsham will use greenfield
land. |
Refer to
need to look at brownfield sites outside Bath. |
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
?
|
Beneficial
impact regarding potential public transport use is questionable
see air quality comment. Development at Keynsham may have
potential for renewable energy dependent on development
form. |
|
| STRATEGY: S29
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
?
|
|
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
?
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
+/-
|
Development in this location will enable provision of formal
accessible open space, but leads to loss of
countryside. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
-
|
Loss of
landscape character to development. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
-
|
Strategy
leads to loss of wildlife habitats and other nature conservation
interests. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
++
|
Strategy
works towards meeting District housing needs. |
|
| STRATEGY:
S30 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
++
|
Strategy
aims to reduce the need to travel. |
Link to
local Transport Plan vision and objectives for the Districts
towns. |
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
++
|
Strategy
provides local job opportunities and seeks to regenerate Norton-Radstock. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
++
|
Should
enhance the town centres of Midsomer Norton and Radstock via
increased activity. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
+?
|
Strategy
should reduce the need to travel in the long term by creating a
more balanced community. However, this is dependent on type of
commercial/industrial development attracted to the
area. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=?
|
Positive
impact in terms of housing i.e.: limiting further housing
development. However, what type of sites will be developed, for
commercial uses greenfield / brownfield? Restriction on
housing development may be outweighed by additional commercial
development. |
Focus
commercial development on the re-use of brownfield
sites. |
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
+
|
Strategy
is aimed at reducing the need to travel creating a more
balanced community. However, employment development may be energy
hungry and attract journeys from elsewhere. |
|
| STRATEGY: S30
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+?
|
See air
quality comment. Should promote higher local living
standards/social inclusion. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
-?
|
Strategy
might result in loss of public open space, whereas in housing
developments there is a need to provide this. There is no such
requirement for employment development. |
Should
think about requiring provision of public open space in employment
sites. |
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
?
|
Dependent
on whether development makes a positive contribution to or detracts
from landscape. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
-?
|
Dependent
on whether development makes a positive contribution to or harms
nature conservation interests. However, development likely not to
encourage conservation interests. |
Ensure
that development would not harm nature conservation
interests. |
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
?
|
Dependent
on whether development makes a positive contribution to or harms
the townscape. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
-
|
Negative
impact because Norton-Radstock will not play a substantial role in
meeting the housing development needs of the District. Strategy
seems to discourage housing development in Norton- Radstock. |
|
|
STRATEGY: S31
|
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
The
strategy contains three elements. These are assessed separately
as:
- Limited development in villages,
which contributes to economic and social vitality.
- Village clusters option. (*The term
clusters is not clear. The strategy appears to be proposing
key settlements).
- Meeting local employment needs in
villages.
|
Clarify
the meaning of the term clusters. Could be dispersing a range of
facilities within a defined cluster of villages, or concentrating
development in one key village to serve other villages. |
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
-
- ++
- ?*
3. +
|
Strategy
provides for local needs in order to reduce the need to
travel. |
Link to
the Local Transport Plan vision and objectives for rural
areas. |
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
1. +
2. ?*
3. ++
|
Strategy
supports development which contributes to local economic vitality
(limited employment development). |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
-
- ++
- ?*
- ++
|
Strategy
aimed at securing development to maintain (and enhance?) village centres. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
1. =
2. ?*
3. =
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
1. +
2. ?*
3. +
|
Strategy
is aimed at reducing the need to travel for village residents
resulting in a positive impact upon air quality. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
1. ?
2. ?*
3. =
|
Impact
uncertain, partly dependent on scale of development e.g.: larger
scale development can provide opportunities for water recycling,
which might be lost with smaller scale development. |
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
1. ?
2. ?*
3. -?
|
Impact
uncertain depends on type, scale and location of development
e.g.: greenfield or brownfield. Difficult to appraise.
This could lead to a significant
loss of land.
|
The
strategy should refer to the scale of development appropriate in
each village. |
| STRATEGY: S31
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
1. +
2. ?*
3. +
|
The
strategy seeks to reduce the need for village residents to travel
thus reducing energy use within the transport sector. |
|
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
1. +
2. ?*
3. +
|
The
strategy supports provision of local services and the raising of
rural living standards which benefits health. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
1. =
2. ?*
3. =
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of access to open space and recreation for people? |
1. ?
2. ?*
3. ?
|
Potential
loss of public open space although dependent on development
location. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
1. ?
2. ?*
3. -?
|
Impact
dependent on location, type, scale and design of development. Could
adversely affect areas of landscape value. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
1. ?
2. ?*
3. -?
|
Impact
dependent on location, type, scale and design of development. Could
adversely affect areas of nature conservation value. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
1. ?
2. ?*
3. ?
|
Impact
uncertain heavily dependent upon design. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
1. =/-
2. ?*
3. =
|
This
strategy appears to maintain the status quo or is perhaps slightly
more restrictive than previous policy in relation to housing
provision in villages. |
|
| STRATEGY:
S32 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
This is
not a strategy as written and therefore, cannot be appraised
against the criteria set out. It seems to be a statement of fact,
which is in itself dubious. Some development might be sustainable
in hamlets e.g.: Living and Working section of the Issues Report
indicates that diversification / re-use may be appropriate.
Therefore, there is inconsistency between different parts of the
Issues Report. |
Amendment
may be needed to the effect that whilst in general development is
not favoured in such locations because it is unsustainable,
appropriate development may be acceptable as it could benefit the
economic and social vitality of hamlets thus reducing the need to
travel. |
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
?
|
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
?
|
|
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
?
|
|
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
?
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
?
|
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
?
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
?
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S32
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
?
|
|
|
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
?
|
|
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
?
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
?
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
?
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
?
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
?
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
?
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S33 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
=
|
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
=
|
|
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
+/-
|
Could be
positive or negative maintains housing development close to
centres however, could lead to the loss of other uses / sites to
housing development. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
=
|
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
+?
|
Drawing of
Housing Development Boundaries should restrict new housing to the
built up area which would be beneficial by preventing unrestricted
development on the edge of settlements, although this is dependent
on where the boundary is drawn. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
+?
|
By
containing development within settlements should serve to reduce
the need to travel. |
|
| STRATEGY: S33
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
=
|
|
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
-?
|
Strategy
might create pressure on informal (undesignated) public open
space. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
+?
|
Impact is
uncertain, depends where the HDB is drawn however, in the
past they have been drawn to exclude areas of landscape
interest. |
Draw
boundaries so as to exclude areas of landscape
interest. |
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
+?
|
Impact is
uncertain, depends where the HDB is drawn however, in the
past they have been drawn to exclude areas of nature conservation
interest. |
Draw
boundaries so as to exclude areas of nature conservation
interest. |
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S34 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
+
|
Strategy
is aimed at reducing the need to travel by encouraging development
at locations easily accessible by means other than the car and also
promotes mixed use developments which impact positively on air
quality. |
Link to
Local Transport Plan objectives for rural areas. |
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
++
|
The
strategy relates to the provision for new employment uses and
therefore, must benefit and promote the local economy. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
++
|
The
strategy suggests that employment development should be located
where it is easily accessible by means other than the car this is
frequently city and town centres. Therefore, this strategy should
benefit these centres in terms of additional economic
activity. |
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
+
|
See
Transport and accessibility comment. |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
-?
|
The
strategy is likely to result in / encourage some land take for
employment development. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
+
|
See air
quality comment. |
|
| STRATEGY: S34
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+
|
Improvements to air quality resulting from this strategy will
benefit public health. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
+
|
Mixed-use
element of the strategy has a positive impact, as it is likely to
encourage natural surveillance. |
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
?
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
?
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
?
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
+
|
Strategy
stipulates that in rural areas new development should be in scale
and character with the area which should ensure local
distinctiveness and the built environment is
maintained. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S35 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
This
strategy proposes to carry out research, which will feed into
policy formulation. Therefore impacts are neutral at this stage of
the process. |
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
=
|
|
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
=
|
|
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
=
|
|
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
=
|
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
=
|
|
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S35
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
=
|
|
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
=
|
|
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
=
|
|
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
=
|
|
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
=
|
|
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
=
|
|
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S36 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
+
|
These are
the most accessible locations and the strategy seeks to reduce the
need to travel. |
|
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
+
|
This
strategy is likely to benefit the local economy via job
opportunities created. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
++ /
-?
|
The
strategy will have a significant positive impact on city and town
centres in terms of vitality and viability. However it may have a
negative impact on local / village centres by taking development
and activity away from these centres. |
Concern
regarding the use of the term priority. Priority should
reflect need, otherwise priority afforded to retail / office /
leisure uses could conflict with other strategies. Clarity is also
needed in relation to the type of retail / office / leisure
development this strategy refers to. |
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
=
|
|
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
+?
|
The aim of
this strategy is clearly positive in seeking to reduce the need to
travel. However the strategy could result in increased congestion,
therefore damaging air quality |
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
=
|
|
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
+
|
The
strategy promotes development within the city and town centres,
thereby reducing the pressure on land in fringe
locations. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
+?
|
See
comment for air quality. |
|
|
STRATEGY: S36 Continued
|
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
+?
|
Impact on
air quality will impact on health. See comment for air
quality. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
+
|
The
strategy could increase vitality / activity in the city and town
centres which would benefit security in terms of increased natural
surveillance. |
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
?
|
Impact
uncertain depends on sites developed. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
?
|
See
comment for open space. |
|
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
?
|
See
comment for open space. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
?
|
Impact is
uncertain depends on design. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY:
S37 |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council Strategies /
Other Notes |
| General
Comments: |
|
|
|
| Transport and Accessibility: Will the strategy reduce
the need to travel and / or increase accessibility by a choice of
means of transport? |
=
|
|
Development of Brownfield sites may not always be appropriate
in terms of reducing need to travel e.g. isolated sites in
countryside. |
| Economy
and Employment: Will the strategy promote economic growth,
employment and a diverse economy? |
+
|
The
strategy includes allocating land for employment uses. Brownfield
development may create more employment than greenfield development
due to need for greater site preparation and treatment prior to
development taking place. |
|
| Vitality and Viability of Centres: Will the strategy
maintain and / or enhance the vitality and viability of the City
and town centres and support local service centres in urban and
rural areas? |
=
|
|
|
| Minerals and Waste: Will the strategy conserve, or
reduce the consumption of minerals; reduce the production of waste,
or promote its recovery? |
+
|
The
strategy will have a positive impact in reducing the consumption of
minerals as it promotes the re-use of buildings one form of
brownfield site. |
|
| Air
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality of the air? |
=
|
|
|
| Water
Quality: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the
quality and quantity of water? |
+?
|
The
strategy may lead to the decontamination of some brownfield sites,
thereby having a positive impact on water quality. |
|
| Land
and Soil: Will the strategy conserve land and / or soil
resources? |
++
|
The
strategy prioritises the re-use of brownfield land, thereby
reducing pressure on greenfield land. |
|
| Energy
Consumption and Energy Sources: Will the strategy reduce energy
consumption or increase the potential for renewable
energy? |
=
|
|
|
| STRATEGY: S37
Continued |
| Appraisal
Criteria |
Overall
Impact |
Commentary |
Suggested
Amendments To The Strategy / Action For Other Council
Strategies |
| Health: Will the strategy promote the safeguarding of
public health? |
= /
+?
|
Possible
decontamination of land may benefit health. |
|
| Safety
and Security: Will the strategy help create safer and more
secure environments? |
= /
+?
|
The
strategy encourages the re-use of derelict sites, which may
represent a safety hazard. |
|
| Open
Space: Will the strategy maintain and / or improve the quality
of and access to open space and recreation for people? |
?
|
The
strategy may reduce pressure to develop public open space, however
some brownfield sites form valuable public open space. |
|
| Landscape: Will the strategy maintain and / or enhance
landscape character? |
?
|
Whilst the
strategy stipulates the need to take account of nature
conservation and landscape value it is not clear what this
means. |
Clarification of this phrase. |
| Nature
Conservation: Will the strategy maintain and/or enhance sites
of nature conservation value and nature conservation interests in
the District? |
?
|
See
comment for landscape. |
|
| Built
Environment: Will the strategy maintain and enhance local
distinctiveness through the conservation of built heritage and
archaeology or improve the quality of the townscape? |
?
|
Impact is
uncertain depends on design. |
|
| Housing: Will the strategy meet the housing needs of the
District by providing a range of housing types in different
locations and / or include affordable housing? |
+
|
This
strategy is assumed to include allocating land for housing,
therefore beneficial impact in terms of this criterion. However,
brownfield development may be more costly than greenfield
development meaning that affordable housing may be more difficult
to provide. |
|
|