Walking Strategy
2. Principles for Development of the Walking Strategy
The Council has already adopted a number of principles which
will guide the development of the walking strategy. These
include:
- the need to reinforce natural corridors of movement. This could
be, for example, through providing further crossing places or
pedestrian priority
- making the strategy destination-based – in other words,
building it around existing or potential nodes of pedestrian
concentration such as offices, suburbs
etc
- incorporating it more formally within development control
procedures (e.g. ‘how does this proposal assist
walking?)
- ensuring that those without access to a car have real choice
(e.g. linking residential areas to shops with uninterrupted
pedestrian links, providing good walking access to bus stops and
railway stations).
The result will be a great encouragement to walk with all the
health and social benefits which that confers. It is likely that
the strategy will create a particularly significant potential for
increased walking in the following areas:
- Education – schools, colleges and
universities
- Employment – walking to work
- Local shopping – reducing dependency on the
car
- Leisure.
The priority given to walking is particularly important within
the central areas of Bath, Keynsham and Norton–Radstock. Bath’s
CI:TE team is putting forward a programme of schemes for Bath City
Centre which are developed around the principle of reallocation of
road space to pedestrians. Keynsham and Norton-Radstock also have
planned or approved schemes to improve the safety, convenience and
attractiveness of the centres for pedestrians.
In comparison with other major historic cities, Bath already has
heavy reliance on walking as a means of everyday transport (see
table below). It is the aim of the Walking Strategy to maintain the
importance of walking as a mode of transport not just in Bath but
throughout the authority’s area.
|
1991 Mode to Work for Selected Towns and Cities (OPCS
Census) |
| |
Main Mode to Work for Residents
Working in Area (percentage) |
|
Location |
Pop
1991
(000) |
Car
m/c |
Bus |
Walk |
Bike |
Rail |
Home |
Other |
Total |
|
Premier historic cities |
|
Bath
Cambridge
Edinburgh
Oxford
York |
80
92
448
110
175 |
48
39
43
40
40 |
12
5
33
15
8 |
28
15
16
18
24 |
3
31
2
19
20 |
0
0
0
0
0 |
6
7
4
6
5 |
3
3
2
2
2 |
100
100
100
100
100 |
|
Other towns and cities with an historic
core |
|
Cheltenham
Exeter
Gloucester
Ipswich
Norwich |
103
98
102
117
121 |
58
56
62
55
50 |
6
13
9
13
9 |
18
20
14
17
24 |
10
4
9
9
10 |
0
0
0
0
0 |
6
4
4
3
4 |
2
2
3
2
3 |
100
100
100
100
100 |