|
OBJECTIVE |
ACTION |
BY JULY
2001 |
BY MARCH 2002 |
BY MARCH 2005 |
LEAD
BODIES |
|
PROPER CONSIDERATION FOR
WALKING |
Policy, funding and guidance should reflect the higher priority
now attached to walking. |
|
|
|
Central Government |
| |
Set local targets for encouraging walking, for particular types
of journey and for environmental indicators such as footway and
footpath condition. |
Measure existing walking levels to work in Bath, Keynsham and
Norton-Radstock
Initiate reporting system for dealing with footway and footpath
condition complaints (see below under maintenance actions in
People-Friendly Facilities) |
Achieve progress towards targeted increase in walking trips and
reduction in footway and footpath condition complaints |
Achieve targeted increase in walking trips and reduction in
footway and footpath condition complaints |
Local authorities |
| |
Look at setting out a formal order in which planners should
consider the needs of different types of transport, as in York
etc. |
(Already adopted as a principle.)
Run training courses for technical staff on detailed design of
facilities for walking. |
Local authorities |
|
INTEGRATING WALKING INTO TRANSPORT,
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING |
The Government is revising land use and development guidance to
increase the emphasis given to walking in planning and development.
All organisations involved should follow the guidance. |
Incorporate revised PPG13 advice as appropriate into Local Plan
Revision, Supplementary Planning Guidance. All planning
applications to consider impact upon walking |
Central Government, local authorities and
developers |
| |
Where developments will generate a lot of travel, aim to place
them in existing centres, so they are accessible by
walking. |
Local authorities |
| |
Retain existing facilities and develop new ones in neighbourhood
centres as far as possible, so they are within walking distance of
people’s homes |
Local authorities |
| |
Ensure walking journeys within and around developments are safe,
convenient and attractive. |
Ensure that proposed Southgate development (Bath) will provide
quality walking environment for users of shopping centre, bus and
rail station |
Ensure similar attention to walking needs at all other
developments being proposed |
Local authorities and developers |
|
GATHERING DATA |
Include pedestrian groups, other organisations and the wider
community in consultation on transport policy and
provision. |
Joint Liaison Group already set up, meeting 6 times a
year |
Local authorities and transport operators |
| |
Regularly review the facilities for walking, and make sure local
people have the opportunity to raise issues and identify
problems. |
Publish Walking Audit guidelines
Publish results of initial pilot study
Continue program of audits |
Continue program of audits. |
Local authorities |
|
PROVISION OF HIGH QUALITY
NETWORKS |
Provide high quality networks, particularly between key
destinations such as residential areas, schools, shopping areas,
bus stops, stations and places of work. |
Design walking networks for Bath, Norton-Radstock and
Keynsham
Consult with local interest groups and public |
Implement 25% of network, concentrating on identified priority
routes |
Complete network |
Local authorities |
| |
Reduce the impact on walking routes of heavily used roads,
derelict land, industrial areas and other factors which discourage
use. |
Ensure regeneration plans for Radstock SRB, Western Riverside,
provide quality walking routes as a by-product
Review footways on urban and rural roads |
Ensure similar opportunities seized in other regeneration sites
to improve the walking environment |
Local authorities and developers |
| |
Improve links between walking and other modes of transport
within the network. Make access to transport interchanges easy,
safe, convenient and well-signposted for all users, including
disabled people. |
Ensure convenient solution to transport interchange at Southgate
(Bath)
Review conditions at other rail stations for pedestrian and
disabled access and make recommendations for improvement
Continue programme of quality partnerships to improve
accessibility of bus stops |
Implement recommended action at rail stations and bus stops
throughout B&NES |
Local authorities and transport operators |
| |
Follow guidance on providing for both pedestrians and
cyclists. |
Incorporate guidance in IHT Guidelines and other sources into
continuing professional training of technical staff |
Local authorities |
| |
Make walking networks convenient and safe, particularly at
junctions, crossing points and transport interchanges. |
Undertake remedial programmes to remedy defects identified in
audits |
Local authorities |
|
PEOPLE-FRIENDLY
FACILITIES |
In areas of high pedestrian activity, consider lowering speed
limits, calming traffic and reallocating road space to
pedestrians. |
Through adoption of IHT Guidelines and staff training, new
schemes will be checked for pedestrian-friendliness
Existing popular and strategic walking routes will be
reviewed |
Local authorities |
| |
Establish and evaluate pilot schemes for home zones. |
Feasibility study undertaken |
Implement one pilot scheme |
Implement other schemes where likely to be appropriate and
effective |
Local authorities, central Government |
| |
Ensure that buildings are conveniently and obviously accessible
on foot. |
|
|
|
Developers |
| |
Improve road safety for pedestrians in conjunction with making
routes more convenient for people walking. |
Through adoption of IHT Guidelines and staff training, new
schemes will be checked for pedestrian-friendliness
Existing popular and strategic walking routes will be reviewed
throughout the period, and improvements made in accordance with
annual spending constraints
Traffic management schemes which include traffic signals to be
particularly checked for the pedestrian-friendliness of signal
timings |
Local authorities |
| |
Designing to reduce crime both for walking routes and
multi-purpose spaces, without making walking less
convenient. |
Planners in consultation with police and the wider
community |
| |
Identify and target for action locations where crime or fear of
crime is acting as an important barrier to walking. |
|
Local authorities and police |
| |
Provide crossing facilities that people will choose to use. This
will help to remove conflict between safety and quick, efficient
crossing of the road. |
|
Local authorities |
| |
Consider increasing the frequency of pedestrian phases in the
signal cycle. |
|
Local authorities |
| |
Consider minor improvements of crossing facilities, such as
increasing the distance between the traffic stop line and the
crossing, or reducing the crossing distance. |
|
Local authorities |
| |
Maintain footways and key footpaths to a high standard. |
Through adoption of IHT Guidelines and staff training, develop
footway condition monitoring and maintenance programme
Existing popular and strategic walking routes to be reviewed
throughout the period, and improvements made in accordance with
annual spending constraints |
Local authorities |
| |
Review the rules covering the co-ordination of work and the
quality of reinstatement of footways and footpaths following
utility excavations. |
|
|
|
Central Government |
| |
Minimise disruption and inconvenience to pedestrians during
footway works. |
Through adoption of IHT Guidelines and staff training, develop
footway condition monitoring and maintenance programme
Existing popular and strategic walking routes to be reviewed
throughout the period, and improvements made in accordance with
annual spending constraints
Follow IHT Guidelines on implementation of New Roads and Street
Works Act relating to footway and footpath reinstatement after
utility works |
Utilities and local authorities |
| |
Reinstate footways to a high standard after street
works. |
|
Utilities and local authorities |
| |
Remove superfluous street furniture. |
|
Utilities and local authorities |
| |
Make sure that street furniture is well-designed and
-placed. |
|
Utilities and local authorities |
| |
Place and trim trees and other plants so as not to get in the
way of people walking. |
|
Local authorities and landowners |
|
PROMOTION AND
INFORMATION |
Publish walking route maps which connect well with public
transport information. |
Commission design for on-street maps of walking routes / public
transport connections in central Bath |
Install maps in appropriate places
Prepare maps of walking routes and public transport connections
in Keynsham and Norton-Radstock |
Install maps in appropriate places
Publish walking guides to B&NES urban areas |
Transport operators, voluntary groups and local
authorities |
| |
Signpost walking routes clearly. |
Design new signing style for central Bath in conjunction with
artist-in-residence
Review of pedestrian signing in Keynsham and
Norton-Radstock |
Implement central Bath re-signing
Bringing direction signing up to standard in Keynsham and
Norton-Radstock |
Local authorities |
| |
Make it clear who has access and priority in places where it is
currently ambiguous. |
Existing popular and strategic walking routes will be reviewed
throughout the period, and improvements made in accordance with
annual spending constraints |
Local authorities |
| |
Support TravelWise, travel plans, school travel plans and other
initiatives, and improve routes used by them. |
Consider joining TravelWise consortium of local authorities
Work with Envolve and other agencies to promote walking as part
of a balanced sustainable transport plan for B&NES, its
employers and other organisations |
Local authorities’ health bodies, education providers,
employers, transport operators and voluntary groups |
| |
Raise awareness of the problems encountered by pedestrians
amongst other road users. |
Road Safety to consider appropriate campaigns to discourage
footway parking, inconsiderate footpath and footway cycling, dog
fouling, obstruction of walking routes by retailers etc. |
Central Government and local authorities |
| |
Produce and distribute material promoting walking as part of a
healthy lifestyle. |
|
|
|
Central Government, the HEA, health authorities and NHS
Trusts |