Contact:
  • Transportation Planning Team
  • Address:
    Riverside,Temple Street,Keynsham,Bristol.BS31 1LA.
  • E-mail:
    Transportation@bathnes.gov.uk
  • Telephone:
    01225 395235
  • Fax:
    01225 394335
  • Minicom:
    01225 394166
  • Page Updated:
    14/09/2007
  • Author:
    Marc Tite
A to Z Index

4 - A Vision for Transport

4.1 Introduction

This section describes the development of a Transport Vision for B&NES based on the principles of the over-arching objectives described in the previous section. In some senses it could be described as ‘Utopian’ in that it describes a very high quality, almost ideal state of transport within the authority area without being unduly constrained by finance, traveller behaviour, transport infrastructure. The Oversight Group felt that it was particularly important to set out an unhindered Transport Vision of this nature, to set an ultimate goal that should be sought. It was also considered important to set a benchmark, against which, transport strategies and conditions might be judged and monitored. It is recognised that in the ‘real world’ that such a high level of vision is very difficult to achieve; later sections describe the problems and conflicts associated with this Vision and how a practical transport strategy could be developed from it.

Section 4.2 summarises the key features of the Transport Vision, which has been identified including both its primary and secondary features. Section 4.3 describes the development of that Vision through an examination of the Government’s 21 transport objectives as set out in the GOMMMS framework.

4.2 Transport Vision Summary

Introduction

The following sections set out the main features of the Transport Vision, which was developed largely by the Oversight Group based on their extensive experience of transport planning both in the UK and overseas. It is separated into those elements that are considered to be of principal importance and those that are considered to be secondary.

Principal Features of Transport Vision

With the Transport Vision in place, the transport networks would efficiently serve the local economy allowing it to grow and prosper without being significantly affected by traffic congestion. Links to the national and international transport network would facilitate the movement of public transport, goods and private vehicles, and would provide for the travel needs of the workforce, visitors and tourists.

Motorists in the City of Bath and the other urban areas within B&NES would not experience significant traffic congestion, and there would be a high level of journey time reliability.

Throughout B&NES there would be a high quality attractive public transport network, with guaranteed levels of service and accessibility that would enable tourists, residents and visitors to undertake their desired activities without being dependent on the private car. The levels of service and accessibility, and the way, in which they were provided, would vary according to population concentrations and location.

In those areas of quality townscape, landscape or historic buildings, the settings of these features would not be degraded by the intrusion of moving or parked vehicles, except those vehicles essential to service the local activities.

In the centre of the urban areas, especially the historic core of Bath, air quality would be maintained at levels well above national guidelines and noise levels (from transport) would be kept substantially below ‘annoyance levels’

Secondary Features of the Transport Vision

The public transport network would provide a travelling experience, which is reliable, convenient and agreeable. Vehicles and waiting environments would be clean, comfortable and secure. The need for interchange would be minimised, but where necessary it would be a low stress experience.

In residential areas, the level of transport activity would be such that noise and air quality were fully compliant with national standards. Trends in greenhouse gas emissions resulting from transport activity throughout B&NES would make a positive contribution to the achievement of national targets.

Communities that lie on major traffic routes would not suffer from severance. Traffic would pass through their streets at a safe speed, and there would be extensive crossing opportunities. There would be a high level of user compliance with the rules and regulations governing the use of the transport network and where necessary, an adequate enforcement system would be available.

Underlying Requirements

Underpinning this vision is the recognition of the following:

Firstly, that best UK practice in transportation planning and traffic engineering should continue to be adopted in B&NES and potential international experience exploited wherever appropriate;

Secondly, that adequate finance should be available to provide the means through which the Vision can be achieved; and

Thirdly, that the threat posed by continued traffic growth, particularly within the built-up areas, could severely compromise the achievement of the Transport Vision.

4.3 Vision Development

The concepts of the Vision were developed and refined by reviewing them against the 21 objectives of Government transport policy. It has been structured in this form in order to have direct relevance to Government assessment techniques This process is summarised in Table 4.1 at the end of this chapter and the following sections describe its development, in relation to each of the transport policy objectives.

Vision Development – Environment 
  1. Noise

    Noise associated with transport, in particular road traffic, can adversely affect a wide range of activities. It can be a particular nuisance when it affects people in their homes and at night when it can disturb sleep. Furthermore, people’s enjoyment of both the built and natural environment can be seriously impaired by excess noise from transport.

    The vision therefore asserts that national noise protection standards should be achieved in all residential areas within the district and that within the historic core of Bath, a higher standard should be sought, to ensure that residents and visitors can enjoy the city’s heritage without being subject to excessive noise.

  2. Local Air Quality

    One of the major adverse side effects of traffic congestion within B& NES is the impact that this has on air quality. Not only does this harm the fabric of the built up areas but also creates a risk to health.

    The Vision therefore stipulates that national air quality standards should be achieved throughout B& NES and within areas of particular heritage value, such as the central area of Bath, higher standards are sought in order to protect these internationally recognised assets from degradation. It is also important that future changes in air quality standards are closely monitored as on going research reveals the longer-term effects of exposure to pollutants, for example the growth in asthma in young people.

  3. Greenhouse Gases

    Transport is a major producer of ‘greenhouse gases’ through the combustion of fossil fuels. These emissions are linked to climate change and have been the subject of international treaties, in an attempt to limit further global warming. It is considered essential that the transport policies adopted for B&NES should contribute positively towards national and international targets for reducing the emission of greenhouse gases. As an environmentally conscious authority, B&NES might consider more ambitious targets.

  4. Landscape
  • Landscape can be threatened by transport in 3 particular ways:
  • Through the construction of new infrastructure destroying landscape features or settings;
  • Through transport movements on existing transport infrastructure, detracting from an existing landscape; and
  • Through the by-products of transport movements: noise, emissions, fuel spillages, etc degrading a landscape.

The Vision therefore seeks to minimise the adverse effects of transport on the landscape. In terms of the scale of impact, new infrastructure is expected to have a much greater impact than the other two forms of threat, and as a result, particular care is needed in its design to minimise landscape impacts.

  1. Townscape

    Transport movements, stationary vehicles and the construction of new transport infrastructure, all have the potential to adversely affect townscapes by detracting from the built environment and spoiling the urban experience within B&NES. This affects both residents and visitors. The Vision therefore requires that the relationship between people, traffic and places be such that traffic and parked vehicles are not allowed to dominate the urban environment within B&NES.

  2. Heritage of Historic Resources

    Transport movements can affect historic resources in a number of ways. Partly through the impact of new construction and partly through on-going vehicle movements. With relatively little new transport infrastructure envisaged, the focus of this element of the Vision is on protecting heritage sites from the adverse effects of vehicle movements. Whilst this crosses over a number of sub-objectives, it recognises the need to protect heritage sites from those impacts which would degrade these national/international assets, including emissions, noise, vibration. It is also important that their setting is not devalued by the scale of traffic movements passing by or by surrounding them with parked vehicles.

  3. Biodiversity

    Much of the discussion relating to landscape can also be applied to biodiversity, whilst the Vision recognises the importance of wildlife and natural habitats, it does not consider that there is likely to be the need to implement specific transport policies to protect biodiversity which are not covered under other objectives. The Vision would however require that biodiversity matters be fully considered in the development of new transport infrastructure.

  4. Water

    Issues associated with groundwater, water quality and watercourse management in relation to transport are significant when considering the construction of new infrastructure but are of less concern in relation to existing transport facilities. The Vision therefore focuses on the need to ensure water quality is fully taken into account in the design of new transport infrastructure.

  5. Physical Fitness

    The contribution of transport policy towards fitness in B&NES, is anticipated to be very small and much better considered by other policy areas.

  6. Journey Ambience

If B& NES is to be an attractive place to live, work and visit, journeys to/from and within the authority must be a pleasant experience. This covers all modes but the Vision places particular emphasis on the need to improve public transport making it convenient, reliable and stress-free.

Vision Development – Safety 
  1. Accidents

    The Vision envisages an on-going programme of work to reduce transport accidents, building on best practice, continually reviewing and monitoring accidents and tackling causes. It recognises that for new developments, urban design can play an important role in producing a safer streetscape by modifying traditional relationships between motor vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists. For existing urban and rural areas, changes to streetscape and road layout are identified as being important in transforming driver behaviour.

  2. Security

The Vision requires that, whatever means of transport is chosen by the traveller for a journey in B&NES, it must be safe throughout – free from threats to personal security. This requires particular attention when considering waiting areas for public transport, car parking, footpaths, and cycleways and during the hours of darkness.

Vision Development – Economy 
  1. Transport Economic Efficiency

    It is recognised that congestion represents economic inefficiency and has a number of adverse environmental side effects. The Vision therefore requires that the traffic network should operate with minimal practical levels of congestion and provide very reliable journey times.

    Whilst the elimination of congestion would also assist the public transport user, there is also the need to ensure that public transport journey times are competitive

  2. Reliability

    One of the most important features of the Vision relates to reliability. That includes journey time reliability for private vehicles and, both journey time and service reliability for public transport. This reliability benefits all types of activity within B&NES but is of particular importance to the local economy where uncertainties in journey time are considered to be an existing problem and threat to future growth.

  3. Wider Economic Impacts

This objective relates to the effect of transport on areas with specific economic problems – essentially re-generation areas. Whilst B&NES does not contain any nationally designated re-generation areas, the Vision recognises the variations in economic conditions throughout B&NES and that in some areas the local economy is relatively weak, with higher levels of unemployment and lower income levels. This is particularly relevant to some of the towns and villages south of Bath that previously had economies based on traditional industries such as mining which have now ceased.

The Vision recognises the need to improve access by car and public transport from these areas to the major urban centres Bristol and Bath, and also to the strategic transport networks. It must be stressed however that these measures on their own are not guaranteed to enhance the local economy but can assist in combination with other economic development policies.

Vision Development - Accessibility
  1. Option Values

    This is not considered to have relevance to the Transport Vision for B&NES.

  2. Severance

    It is recognised that in a number of communities within B&NES, that the presence of major transport networks (mainly highways) passing through those communities has a substantial impact on the quality of life. These highway corridors can form major barriers to pedestrian activity and degrade the urban environment through the effects of noise and air quality discussed above. The severance issue has a number of facets including the physical barriers created by roads but also elements of fear and intimidation associated with traffic travelling at speed close to pedestrians.

    To tackle these problems the Transport Vision requires significant treatment of the streetscape within towns and villages that are traversed by major highway routes to minimise these severance effects, based on the principles set out in section 4.3.2.

  3. Access to the Transport System

A cornerstone of the Transport Vision is the need to provide high level of public transport accessibility. The Vision is founded on the concept of setting minimum public transport accessibility standards, based on area type, to be applied throughout the whole of B&NES. These standards will specify the following:

  • Maximum access time to public transport stops/stations;
  • Minimum service frequencies to particular types of activity; and
  • Maximum public transport journey times to particular types of activity.
  • The area types are based on settlement size/population density.
Vision Development – Integration

1.Transport Interchange

It is recognised that any degree of interchange within journeys is an undesirable feature, which is perceived by the travelling public as complicating a journey. These perceptions are compounded by the general quality of transport interchanges within the UK (and in B&NES) which generally have unattractive waiting environments, poor facilities and lack of information for travellers. Furthermore, there is frequently a lack of integration between services of a particular mode and many problems of integration between different modes, although bus-based park & ride services are becoming increasingly well used.

The Transport Vision therefore requires the following:

  • Where possible ‘through’ public transport services should be provided to allow direct door-to-door journeys to be made on a single mode without need for interchange;
  • Transport interchanges are of a very high quality with good facilities and information; and
  • Integration of services and between modes is of a high standard.

2.Land-Use Policy

In general it is believed that the existing land-use policy framework for B&NES, supports the Transport Vision. The following land-use issues are important:

The need to attempt to balance employment and residential development being conscious of the skillbase and employment types;

Recognising the adverse effects of high property prices in Bath and in some of the surrounding rural areas on the ability of local workers to reside close to their place of work.; and

The attraction of people living in rural areas for quality of life reasons, commuting into the urban centres for employment placing significant strain on transport infrastructure.

3.Other Government Policies

The Transport Vision requires that Government policies address in a holistic way the need to tackle growth in private car traffic, particularly through its influence on the perceived costs of using specific modes, through for example fuel pricing, vehicle taxation, company car and other legislation.

Conclusions

The development of the Transport Vision is summarised in Table 4.1. It demonstrates the extent to which each of the Government’s 21 Transport Sub-objectives have been considered within the overall Vision composition.

Table 4.1 – Transport Vision Development
Criteria Sub-Criteria Form of Vision
Environment

Noise

National standards should be attained in all residential areas. The centre of Bath should strive for a better standard.

Local air quality

National standards should be attained in all residential areas. The centre of Bath should strive for a better standard.

Greenhouse gases

All areas should achieve national targets.

Landscape

Minimise the adverse effects of transport on the landscape.

Townscape

Stationary and moving vehicles detract from the physical appearance of attractive buildings. The impact of transport should be reduced such that it does not inhibit enjoyment of features of the built environment, which exhibit special quality.

Heritage of historic resources

Stationary and moving vehicles detract from the physical appearance of attractive buildings and monuments. The impact of transport should be reduced such that it does not inhibit enjoyment of historic resources, which exhibit special quality.

Biodiversity

Biodiversity matters should be fully considered in the development of new transport infrastructure.

Water

Water quality should be fully taken into account in the design of new transport infrastructure.

Physical fitness

Not applicable.

Journey ambience

Journeys should be reliable, convenient and agreeable.

Safety

Accidents

There should be an on-going programme of work to reduce transport accidents, to build on best practice, to ensure continual review and monitoring and to tackle the causes. Safer streetscapes in new developments through urban design. Transformation of driver behaviour in existing urban and rural areas through changes to streetscape and road layout.

Security

Journeys should be free from threats to personal security from end to end

Economy

Transport economic efficiency

All areas should be free from congestion, and vehicles should enjoy a guaranteed minimum peak hour speed.

Reliability

Journey time reliability is dealt with under journey ambience and transport economic efficiency. Operational reliability should be improved.

Wider economic impacts

The transport system should be able to facilitate economic activity without having an undesirable impact on congestion.

Accessibility

Option values

Not applicable.

Severance

Must be reduced to insignificant levels where it occurs

Access to the transport system

There should be a guaranteed minimum level of access to the transport system.

Integration

Transport interchange

Should be minimised as far as possible. Where it is necessary, it should be efficient and reliable.

Land-use policy

The existing land-use policy of B&NES supports the Transport Vision. Key issues include attempting to balance employment and residential development with skillbase and employment types; recognising the adverse effects of high property prices on local workers attempts to reside close to their place of employment; addressing the strain placed on the transport infrastructure by people living in rural areas for quality of life reasons, commuting into the urban centres for employment.

Other Government Policy

Enforcement should be enhanced to a level where compliance helps to achieve the vision.

Previous | Next

5 Page of 8