How should social
services staff and foster carers approach work with black and
minority ethnic children?
The Social Services Inspectorate report Excellence not Excuses,
2000 found that there is no easy blue print for the ingredients for
a good assessment for black families. They commented that
"We found black families who did not get on with workers from
their particular ethnic group, and some white workers had
stereotypical views of black people, were not straight with them
and avoided difficult issues. We also found white workers who were
sensitive and understanding, and prepared to go the extra mile in
support of the families with whom they worked. One service user who
had a number of social workers told us "It doesn’t matter what the
colour of the worker is, it’s if they are nice. Another said "race
in not important it is about being up front and honest"
Inquiry Reports into the deaths of black children provide
evidence of a lack of intervention in situations where black
children were at obvious risk of suffering significant harm from
their parents. Two specific reports, Whose Child? The Report of the
Panel of Inquiry into the Death of Tyra Henry 1987 (London Borough
of Lambeth, 1987) and Sukina; An evaluation report of the
circumstances leading to her death (The Bridge Child Care
Consultancy Services, 1991) make a direct link between racism and
the practice of professionals when responding to the children and
families concerned. Both reports identify that stereotyping of
black families and a reluctance on the part of white professionals
to intervene for fear of being accused of racism influenced
practice.
Black people will be more comfortable working with staff or
foster carers who are honest about their lack of knowledge about
their culture than working with people who assume that they know it
all an do not need to learn about the black person’s culture and
background. Open and honest discussion about the issues may be
difficult for staff and foster carers, but it is vital if
misconceptions and offence are to be avoided.
Staff and carers must resolve their own fears and doubts, and
not underestimate issues of race or racism. If they fail to do this
any discomfort or inhibition will be picked up by black children
and families, and communication and trust will be inhibited. These
issues are complex and charged with emotion, so staff may need help
from colleagues to talk about them.
Language:
All staff and foster carers need to be familiar with the correct
words to use so as to avoid offence. Terms such as ‘coloured’ or
‘half-caste’ are offensive and must not be used. However it is not
always easy for a to know what words are appropriate. For example,
there are many terms that can be used to describe a person who has
one black and one white parent such as:
- Half-breed – suggesting that a person not a full or
whole.
- Mixed race – meaning that a person has a mixed racial
background.
- Mongrel – meaning that a person is a cross breed.
- Mixed parentage – suggesting that parents are mixed in terms of
race or culture.
- Bounty – meaning dark on the outside and white in the
middle.
- Dual heritage – which means that a person has two
identities.
Some of these terms are unacceptable and degrading. The terms
that are generally considered to be appropriate and respectful
include mixed parentage and dual heritage. However, some black
people may feel more comfortable using a term that others consider
to be inappropriate, such as mixed race. If you are unsure what
term to use - ask the person that you are working with about their
identity and what they feel comfortable with. If they choose a term
that is not "politically correct", don’t worry it is their choice.
Using terms that a black person has chosen shows that have listened
and respected their point of view.
Culture:
Language can be a barrier that can be overcome through
discussion, but cultural barriers can be more difficult to
identify. The following is an example of how cultural differences
can lead to misunderstandings and barriers to co operation:
In Britain if two business people wish to work together they are
likely to draw up a legally binding contract, and if either side
fails to meet their half of the contract they will settle the
matter in court. In many other cultures, where the rule of law may
not be so strong, business transactions are carried out through
personal relationships based on trust. For example, in such a
culture if two business people wish to work together they will
first build up trust and a rapport, and then their contract will be
no more than a handshake.
Shopping is a simple business transaction. In Britain shops set
a contract when they price their goods, and we accept the contract
when we buy the goods. However, in many other cultures shops do not
have fixed prices for goods, and before a purchase can be made the
seller and the customer must barter and develop a relationship with
each other before they can settle on a price.
Social services staff may be used to working with white people
who are prepared to immediately address the business at hand.
However, if social services staff wish to work with a family from a
culture where contracts are not the norm (as in the example above)
they may need to spend time building up a rapport before the
business at hand can be addressed. For example when working with
people from another culture it may be necessary to spend the first
meeting or two telling the family about yourself and so build trust
and rapport. Only when this is in place can the business at hand be
addressed. Without such an atmosphere of trust it is likely that
there will be little co-operation. A family that could have been co
operative if approached in the right way may be hostile if the
cultural difference is not recognised, and what could have been a
useful opportunity to support a child may be lost.
Assessment
Top