Housing and Supported Living
Housing Strategy 2002-2011 (continued)
5. Needs Analysis
Strategic planning in housing must take into account the needs
and aspirations of all communities in the area. In order to do
this, prior to the Strategy Review Day on 29 April, a short paper
was prepared, pulling together all available information on housing
need in the Bath & North East Somerset area. It was used
as a starting-point for discussion on the day. It is attached
as Appendix A.
The main points were:
- There is a growing gap between need and supply of affordable
housing in the area
- Affordability is a major problem, particularly for people on
low incomes, both in the statutory and service sectors.
- Some of the sheltered housing no longer meet the needs and
aspirations of older people and need reviewing on a
scheme-by-scheme basis.
- More extra-care housing is needed, particularly in light of the
Council’s review of Elderly Persons Homes (See Chapter 8 – Key
Issues for Further Development)
- To meet the principles outlined in Valuing People, a strategy
for increasing supported living options for people with learning
difficulties is needed.
- A range of options for people with poor mental health is
needed
- Whilst the numbers of people presenting as homeless showed a
small decrease, acceptances increased.
- The need for temporary accommodation has increased steadily and
is set to increase further
In line with good practice the Council is in the process of
commissioning a local housing condition survey. This survey
which will cover the entire housing stock, regardless of tenure,
with give us a better appreciation and understanding of the
condition of housing within the district. This information
will then inform and support the development of effective private
sector renewal strategies including future grant
policies.
6. Resources
Within this Strategy, resources are not interpreted narrowly as
only finances, but take into account all of the assets within Bath
& North East Somerset.
Land
Bath and North East Somerset Council owns land, some of
which is suitable for housing development. However current
Council policy is to sell any surplus assets at market value.
This means that our RSL partners in the JCP have to compete with
commercial developers in any negotiations. In such a strong
market, the not-for-profit sector has difficulty competing.
For this reason, development opportunities do not arise as often as
needed. This is an issue that requires member-level
consideration if we are to address the problem of supply.
Empty and Surplus Properties
Similarly any buildings in the Property Services portfolio that
might be suitable for housing if offered to an RSL would still
usually have to be negotiated at market levels. Development
of such properties is also not always viable, as planning
requirements and renovation costs can make such schemes unworkable
and/or financially impractical. However, properties from the
Property Services portfolio have been provided at significantly
lower than market rent for use as temporary accommodation for
homeless households. It is anticipated that further
properties from the portfolio will be used in this way.
Funding from Housing Transfer
Following the Council resolution in October 1998 to transfer its
housing stock to Somer Community Housing Trust, the Council
received a substantial capital receipt. From this, around
£18m was identified to be spent on the provision of new affordable
social housing and will be targeted to meet the needs of local
communities
Bath and North East Somerset has been selected by the
Housing Corporation to undertake Joint Commissioning, a concept
aimed at taking a more strategic approach to social housing
development based on a 6-year development programme, with the
objective of delivering affordable housing more effectively and
efficiently.
The partners have committed themselves to provide development
resources, both human and financial to Bath and North East
Somerset, identifying and pursuing new development opportunities
and developing good quality, affordable homes. Through joint
working, the partners bring a refreshing new approach to meeting
housing needs in the district. The Council’s investment
strategy has been subject to annual review since 1999. A
review of the Joint Commissioning partnership is due to take place
during summer 2002 prior to the Housing Corporations bidding round
in October. The review will consider the contributions of all
partners (including the Council) rather than the principles of
Joint Commissioning and will consider the balance and abilities of
partners as well as past performance. As the £18m investment
programme draws to an end, the review will ensure we have the
partnership in good shape for further future investment.
Approved Development Programme (Investment Programme)
The Approved Development Programme(ADP) is a system of grants
made available to Local Authorities for housing development from
the Housing Corporation. Through the ADP (Investment
Programme) 311 units of affordable housing had been completed by
the end of 2001/2 and a further 74 have been identified to the end
of 2002/3. By the end of the Programme in 2004/5 a total of
600 units will have been delivered.
In the longer term, regeneration of large mixed development
sites already identified will produce affordable housing over the
next ten to fifteen years. These include Southgate, Foxhill,
Western Riverside Development, Norton Radstock SRB. The
timing and numbers of units provided is difficult to predict at
present but may be in the region of 500 from these three projects
over the full fifteen years.
Affordable housing is produced through the Joint Commissioning
Partnership (JCP) where the Council works with five RSLs each of
whom bring their own human resources and capital investment into
our housing programme.
Recent Capital Spending
|
Financial Year |
No of Units |
LASHG |
|
identified |
completed |
Approved bids |
spent |
|
1999/2000 |
143 |
60 |
3,624,381 |
742,411 |
|
2000/2001 |
65 |
142 |
2,874,000 |
4,178,159 |
|
2001/2002 |
97 |
109 |
3,713,634 |
3,920,835 |
|
2002/2003 |
80 |
|
2,541,212 |
|
|
Sub Total |
385 |
311 |
12,753,227 |
8,841,405 |
|
|
|
|
Proposed bids |
|
|
2003/2004 |
140 |
|
5,001,000 |
|
|
2004/2005 |
75 |
|
539,000 |
|
|
Total |
600 |
|
18,292,227 |
|
|
Future |
185 |
|
|
|
Funding Sources
Currently, the two funding sources are from the Housing Transfer
and Housing Corporation Social Housing Grant. The latter is
secured through a bidding process on specific housing projects on
an annual basis. The amount of Housing Corporation funding
has varied in the past according to the type of project but in the
current and future years will match LASHG. The Executive
Member for Community Safety & Housing has requested that a
report be prepared by the relevant officers by the end of August
2002, detailing options for progress on future funding.
Affordable Housing through the planning process
We work with Planning Services to secure affordable housing
through section 106 agreements on suitable sites. Through
this process 9 units of affordable housing were completed in
2001/02 and the projection is 27 in 2002/03 and 4 in 2003/04. The
new Draft Bath & North East Somerset Local Plan and other
existing local plans set out the planning policy basis for seeking
affordable homes on allocated housing or sites coming forward as
windfalls. The new Local Plan sets out lower site size
thresholds than previous plans on which affordable homes will be
sought and the proportion of affordable homes (30%) that will be
sought. Supporting Supplementary Planning Guidance prepared
jointly between Planning and Housing Services, and recently
published for consultation purposes, sets out in more detail
guidance on how these policies will be implemented. It
includes provisions to achieve subsidy-free affordable
housing. When approved it will be an important component in
delivering affordable housing.
Changes in Funding
The current investment programme (agreed by Housing & Public
Protection Committee in March 1999) finishes in 2004/5 and we
anticipate that after this we will have to bid for capital funding
for LASHG at local level. We assume that HCSHG funding will
continue in some form after that date.
Estimate of Future Funding
To mirror the current programme, which provides 100 affordable
homes a year, a total of £5,000,000 SHG would be required.
This would be partly funded by the Housing Corporation, where we
are seeking a 50% Housing Corporation SHG contribution. A
more realistic anticipated percentage would be 30%, which leaves
the Council with a contribution of £3,500,000 LASGH in future
years.
Capital Expenditure and Local Authority Social Housing
Grant
In March 1999 Housing and Public Protection Committee approved
the investment of £18 million in Local Authority Social Housing
Grant (LASHG) to provide 600 affordable homes over 6 years.
The table above (page 19) shows the total expenditure of
LASHG. A more detailed breakdown of schemes and its
associated expenditure is attached as Appendix 5.
The Housing Survey 2000 identified a future need for affordable
housing in Bath & North East Somerset.
Housing 2000 Summary of Conclusions
Suitability of Homes:
- 11.25% of all surveyed felt that their accommodation was not
adequate for their needs
- 25% of those who thought the property inadequate said that it
needed improvement or repair, (representing about 4,033 properties
in all); over 25% (4,099) that it was too small; 12% (1,966) that
it was too costly to heat
- 14% of households in the area contain someone with a special
need, suggesting about 9,400 households in all
- 914 households contain someone who is a wheelchair user, but
only around 46% of households affected live in an adapted
dwelling
Concealed Households:
- Around 2,295 households are living within another household
("concealed households")
- 48% of these concealed households would like to become owner
occupiers but 1,776 (60%) have annual incomes below £17,500 and
could not afford even the cheapest property in the district, even
where a reasonable supply is available
- 83% of concealed households expressed a preference for one or
two bedroom property with 57% looking for a flat and 20% a terraced
property
Existing Households Moving:
- 2,234 households want to move but cannot do so - 2,175
households are unable to afford a move and 1,069 cannot find a
suitable property
- 5,550 households plan to move away from the district, 935
because of lack of affordable housing. The majority (2,687)
are leaving because of employment reasons
The Housing Need Survey has established that approximately 1800
adults have an average annual income of below £17,000.
Currently, a first time buyer needs an average income of £45,000 a
year to be able to afford to buy property in the district.
Early indications show that more and more people will look to the
private sector market, pushing up market rents. This in turn
means that people who could previously afford market rents will now
need to look towards renting a home from a Registered Social
Landlord, who, through public subsidy can keep rents at an
affordable level.
Future Need
The Housing survey 2000 established that the affordable housing
need at 2006 will be 2667 dwellings (this includes 935 households
planning to leave the area due to a lack of affordable
homes.). It is prudent to anticipate that with rising house
prices, this figure will increase. By 2005, the Council -
through its investment programme - will have provided additional
540 homes (year 2000 - 2005). Despite this effort, the
shortfall remains at 2127 homes.
Future investment is needed to provide good quality affordable
accommodation for rent, to avoid families and single people
becoming homeless, being caught in the poverty trap or leaving the
district altogether. This would greatly affect the future of
a balanced, inclusive, sustainable community within Bath and North
East Somerset. In addition, there is an acute need for
housing suitable for people with specific needs, as detailed in the
Needs Paper (Appendix A)
Capital Investment and the Decision Making Process
The overall vision of Bath and North East Somerset is “Making
Bath and North East Somerset a better place to live, work and
visit”. In order to work towards this vision the Council has
adopted a set of strategic objectives, each with a set of specific
performance targets.
These Strategic Objectives are:
- To deliver quality and accessible services
- To promote a thriving economic community and combat
poverty
- To build a healthier and safer community
- To improve quality of life and the environment
- To encourage and support life long learning
In order to work towards its Strategic Objectives and Targets,
the Council agreed an integrated three-year Financial Plan in 2000
that covers both revenue and capital funding. This is
reviewed and rolled forward annually. The Plan identifies six
key themes and also recognises “invest to save” as a basis for
spending in order to reduce future costs or increase income.
Available resources (including target asset sales) normally set the
size of the capital programme. If a funding gap due to
additional needs is forecast, the choice from the use of reserves,
additional asset sales and borrowing is built into the financial
plan.
Each Council service must present an annual plan to Members and
Directors. This includes proposals for changes to the
existing financial plan and items for the additional year.
Management Board then considers future financial prospects and
commitments in a financial planning and risk mitigation exercise
for the whole Council. This identifies potential risks and
capital requirements, often including invest to save projects, for
the next ten years. The Board evaluates potential expenditure
against contributions to strategic objectives, revenue savings, and
risks in order to plan the likely scale and timing of the future
capital programme. Specific proposals, including appropriate
options for service delivery, are considered by the Executive
Member responsible for the area of work before being taken to the
whole Executive and Council.
As detailed earlier, the Financial Plan commits £18 million of
the capital receipt from stock transfer for investment in new
affordable housing in the period 1999-2005. Officers and the
Executive Member for Housing & Community Safety are currently
working to establish the need for capital investment in new
affordable housing for the period 2005-2011 in order to inform the
decision making process set out above.
7. Priorities for Action
One of the key reasons for putting together a strategy is the
need to identify priorities. With restricted resources and
growing need, it is especially important that strategic partners
act together to maximise our capabilities. To this end, at
the Strategy Review Day in April 2002, priorities were identified
and agreed. They have been drawn up into the following SMART
objectives:
|
Target |
Specific |
Measurable |
Achievable |
Realistic |
Time-bound |
|
Short-term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduce the numbers of people needing to move due to lack of
space for carers. |
All RSLs to adopt a more flexible approach to letting
two-bedroomed properties to single people |
More flexible lettings policies that enable RSLs to prepare for
changing needs. Feedback from residents. |
Given a new approach to lettings and effective partnership
working |
RSLs have the authority to change policies, in consultation with
enabling Local Authority |
By March 2003 |
|
Maximise use of existing stock. Reduce
under-occupation. |
Encourage tenants to move from under-occupied properties through
use of Tenants’ Incentive Schemes(TIS) |
Reduction in under-occupation. More 2/3 bed properties
available. RSLs to monitor take-up and longer-term
viability |
Somer already running TIS. To be reviewed. Other RSLs have
powers to establish new schemes |
Long-established practice in all regions |
By March 2003 |
|
Reduced void numbers in sheltered stock. Increased temporary
accommodation/ general stock/land for development |
Review use of all sheltered schemes. Redesignate/ dispose of
unpopular difficult to let properties |
Reduced numbers of voids in sheltered stock. Increased temporary
accommodation /land for development/ disposal |
Unacceptable levels of voids in sheltered properties cannot be
sustained |
RSLs have powers to redesignate stock, in consultation with
enabling Local Authority |
Review to start by Autumn 2002, completed by March
2004 |
|
Comply with the Homelessness Act 2002 requirements to ensure no
families are in B&B by March 2004 |
No homeless families in B&B by March 2003, other than in
emergencies |
Agree a protocol with Children & Family Services around
supporting families at risk of homelessness. Increased units of
non-B&B temporary accommodation |
Achievable with effective partnership between RSLs and
B&NES |
Legal requirement |
By March 2004 |
|
Medium-term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Develop a strategy to make better use of s106 and Council
assets |
Council to commit 25% of all Housing Capital Receipts to
reinvestment in affordable housing |
Increased financial resources available for investment in
affordable housing |
Achievable if given corporate priority |
With corporate support |
By 2004/05 |
|
Increase the range and type of supported accommodation for
both long and short-term needs |
Develop ‘stepping stone’ and core & cluster schemes |
Increased availability of flexible supported housing for a wide
range of people |
Targets to be agreed between Local Authority and RSLs |
With effective partnership working |
By March 2004 |
|
To ensure best use of and access to adapted RSL properties
for applicants on the Specific Needs Register |
Prevent removal of adaptations from RSL properties. Provide
suitable homes for people on the Specific Needs Register. Reduce
the need for grants to adapt properties. |
Reduction in waiting times for applicants with specific needs.
Reduction in void periods. Reduction in resources required for
adaptation of properties. |
Achievable with corporate support and partnership
working |
Specific Needs Register in development. Void information
supplied for Choice-based Lettings will give property
information. |
By July 2003 |
|
Encourage and enable sustainability in local services and the
economy generally |
Identify key workers and develop accommodation options. Increase
employers awareness of housing issues and encourage/ enable their
involvement in identifying solutions. |
Identifiable schemes open to key workers. Reduced recruitment/
retention issues for employers |
Two schemes already approved. Need to work with partners to
co-ordinate existing provision and to develop new schemes. |
Other areas already operating Key Worker Schemes. Identified as
a priority by Central Government. |
By March 2004 |
|
To provide a local focus for strategic housing issues |
Establish, promote and co-ordinate a Strategic Housing
Partnership |
Regular meetings held. Partners fully involved in developing
strategic responses to local housing issues |
Achievable with commitment from Council and partners |
Extension of existing partnerships (Joint Commissioning
Partnership, Single Homelessness Partnership etc) |
First meeting to be held by March 2003 |
|
Long-term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ensuring all B&NES strategies link up and that housing is
central to the Council’s agenda |
A coherent and consistent approach to provision of services that
acknowledges the role of housing in the local economy |
All stakeholders will have identified and signed up to shared
strategic priorities and objectives by March 2011 |
With corporate and political commitment from B&NES and
higher-level organisational commitment from partners. Also,
allocation of resources by B&NES and partners |
Some work already started on this with the Local Strategic
Partnership |
Strategic priorities and objectives to be signed up to by March
2011 |
Short-term =within 1-2 years Medium-term =within 3-5
years Long-term =within 6-11 years
The following milestones will assist in tracking progress on
the priorities identified:
|
Target |
1st Milestone |
Review date |
2nd Milestone |
Achieved by |
|
Reduce numbers of people needing to move due to lack of space
for carers |
Consultation with RSLs by September 2002 |
November 2002 |
Draft lettings policies to Bath & North East Somerset
Council by January 2003 |
Pilot scheme to be operative by March 2003 |
|
Maximise use of existing stock. Reduce
under-occupation. |
Joint Commissioning Partnership to identify potential take-up of
TIS. Action-plan by October 2002 |
January 2003 |
|
March 2003 |
|
Reduce void numbers in sheltered stock. Increase temporary
accommodation/ general stock/land for development. |
Following publication of Somer CHT’s report on the Review of
Sheltered Housing (September 2002), form strategic working
group. By October 2002 |
January 2003 |
|
Review completed by March 2004 |
|
Comply with the Homelessness Act 2002 requirements to ensure no
families are in B&B by March 2004 |
May 2002 31 families in B&B. Housing Options & Advice
Service (HOAS) Manager to produce action-plan by September
2002 |
September 2002 |
May 2003 – 50% reduction achieved? |
March 2004 – no families in B&B |
|
Develop a strategy to make better use of s106 and Council
assets |
Housing, Planning and portfolio-holder to meet by September
2002. Identify issues and formulate an action-plan for
cross-departmental working. |
Priorities and protocols agreed by September 2003. |
Consult with RSLs, builders, developers, private landlords(?) by
January 2004 |
By 2004/05 |
|
Increase the range and type of supported accommodation available
for both long and short term needs |
Final SHMG bid to reflect the priorities identified by basic
needs-mapping and comparison with DTLR Typical Supply Profile for
Bath & North East Somerset Council. By October 2002 |
Outcome of SHMG bids in Jan/Feb 2003 |
Comprehensive Supporting People needs-mapping to be undertaken
in 2003 and to be linked with capital bids in Autumn
2003 |
Supporting People scheme reviews to provide continuous
information on local needs. To inform the commissioning
process. |
|
To ensure access to and best use of adapted RSL properties for
applicants on the Specific Needs Register |
Review and revise the information on void properties received by
Bath & North East Somerset Council by January 2003 |
Develop the existing Specific Needs Register to ensure it is
regularly up-dated and linked to the Homeseekers database by
January 2003 |
Review progress and effectiveness. April 2003 |
July 2003 |
|
Encourage and enable sustainability in local services and the
economy generally |
Scheme for 10 Starter Home Initiative grants for teachers
approved in May 2002. |
Set up meeting with local employers and RSLs by November 2002.
Identify retention/ recruitment issues, raise awareness, identify
key-worker posts. |
Identify level of need and formulate proposals for provision by
March 2003 |
30 units of key-worker accommodation by March 2004 |
|
To provide a local focus for strategic housing issues |
First meeting of Strategic Housing Partnership in September
2002 |
Strategy Review meeting at end of October 2002. Up-date on
progress from Bath & North East Somerset Council, RSLs and
service-providers |
‘Desktop’ review by Planning & Partnership Officer in
November 2002 |
Full Strategy review by all partners in March 2003 |
|
Ensuring all Bath & North East Somerset Council strategies
link up and that housing is central to the Community Strategy and
the work of the Local Strategic Partnership |
Create a direct link from the Strategic Housing Partnership to
the Local Strategic Partnership and the Community Strategy by
October 2002 |
Ensure the Community Strategy identifies and prioritises housing
issues by April 2003 |
|
|
8. Key Issues for Future
Development
Bath and North East Somerset Council is aware that there
are key issues that we either are currently developing or need to
address that do not feature in this strategy. They are
flagged up here with the aim of generating discussion and
instigating further partnership working.
Resources
Bath & North East Somerset Council’s current policy is to
sell surplus assets at market value. The Council will review
its options for future funding including the disposal of
assets.
Land Use, Planning & Housing
Planning has an important role to play in meeting the needs and
aspirations of Bath & North East Somerset’s residents.
The Council recognises that there is a need to continue to develop
existing working practices and strengthen the links between
teams. In this context joint working will be developed during
the preparation of the Local Plan including the Public Local
Inquiry scheduled to start in 2003. This will particularly
focus on affordable housing issues. In addition Strategic
Housing Services will continue to make an important contribution to
the planning application and Development Team processes.
Affordable Homes for Low-Income Households
The problem of affordability is particularly difficult in Bath
& North East Somerset. Over 80% of those in full-time
employment are working in the service sector, where wage levels are
usually very low. Residents working in the statutory sector,
earning a wage that in other parts of the country (or indeed,
region) would be sufficient to cover their housing costs, find that
they are unable to afford suitable housing and are forced to leave
the area. This has implications for the sustainability of
local services and communities. In the short term, a target
of 30 Starter Homes for teachers and health workers has been has
been set (further details are given in the SMART targets included
above). During the time allotted for achieving this target, a
longer-term strategy will be drawn up with partners to address the
needs of key workers and other low-paid workers.
Elderly Persons Homes Re-Provision
In order to meet the new building thresholds for Residential
Care Homes required by the Care Standards Act 2000 the Council, in
October 2001: "authorised officers to commence the detailed
planning for a programme of redevelopment and rebuilding of the
Council's existing residential care service for older people".
On July 12th 2002, the Council Executive considered options for
the re-provision of the Council's Elderly Persons Homes
(EPH). The Executive decided that the preferred model of care
for consultation with residents, their families, staff and Trades
Unions was the provision of three Elderly Persons Homes providing a
total of 105 beds and 75 Extracare Units. Following
consultation on this model of care, a decision on the overall EPH
re-provision programme is due to be made in October 2002. It
is likely that the Housing Strategy will need to be reviewed and
revised in light of this decision.
Choice-Based Lettings
As one of 27 Local Authorities to receive funding to pilot a
Choice-Based Lettings system, Bath and North East Somerset
Council have agreed with local providers that Homeseekers Register
will work towards the following aims:
- To provide informed choice about housing options to
applicants
- To encourage applicants to take a greater stake in satisfying
their long term housing needs
- To contribute to the development of sustainable communities by
addressing the needs of communities in addition to the needs of
individuals
- To provide equality of access and choice for all, including
those who are homeless and/or vulnerable
- To make better use of the housing stock, particularly in
pockets of low demand
- To reduce social exclusion by empowering applicants and
therefore reducing dependency
- To enable applicants to access appropriate housing before
their needs become acute, thereby preventing homelessness
- To provide a transparent service which is easy to understand
and easy to justify to applicants and their advocates
In order to monitor delivery and performance on the Homeseekers
Register, the following targets have been set:
- To establish a framework for operating the rotational
nomination scheme
- To establish a process for managing exceptions to the
rotational nomination scheme
- To assist the Council in meeting its statutory obligations
towards homeless households and other households in housing
need
- To assist the Council in fulfilling its strategic enabling
role
- To ensure a high quality, customer focussed service
- To establish effective procedures for monitoring and regular
review
- To follow the principles of inclusion and choice that form the
objectives of the Homeseekers Register
The following mechanisms are either already in place or will be
put in place to meet the aims outlined above:
- The Partnership Group (BNES and RSL strategic level) will meet
quarterly to review information about these areas.
- The Project Implementation Group (BNES and RSLs operational
staff) will meet bi-monthly and will be picking up on operational
issues
- A new internal review mechanism is to be set up to look at the
policy and areas that may need to be changed as the pilot
progresses
- The reporting for this will be sourced from the iworld housing
software system, quarterly returns from RSLs, and reports specially
commissioned from the CORE lettings recording system.
During the pilot stage, the role of the two groups will focus
more upon monitoring and review.
After the pilot periods, assessments will be made of the
efficiency, effectiveness and value of the Homeseekers Register,
leading to full evaluation and review.
Planning for the Housing Needs of People with Learning
Difficulties
As part of the standards set out in ‘Valuing People’,
Bath and North East Somerset Local Implementation Group for
Learning Difficulties (LIG) is required to produce a Housing &
Support Strategy by Winter 2002/03. The aim of the strategy is to
increase supported living options for people with learning
difficulties and reduce long-term use of residential
accommodation. A multi-agency working group will be brought
together in September 2002 tasked with identifying issues, mapping
current service provision and needs and exploring options for
development. The information already gathered under Supporting
People will be an important tool in assessing existing need and
identifying gaps in services. The Strategy will be built around
information gained during consultation with service-users, their
carers and service-providers/RSLs.
Achieving the Decent Homes Standard
Somer Community Housing Trust, the majority social housing
provider in the district, has responded positively to requirements
of the ‘Decent Homes Standard’. The Trust is currently part way
through a £120 million stock investment programme which will result
in all of the Trust’s properties meeting the requirements.
An assessment against the standard indicates that 45% of the
Trust’s properties will meet the requirements by the end of the
current financial year. Annual targets have then been set
which will see the Trust’s properties compliant by 2008.
Student Accommodation
Bath has a high student population and the need for
accommodation can have a significant impact on delivery of the
targets outlined in this Strategy. Bath and North East Somerset
Council needs to ensure that the need for growing numbers of
properties for students is balanced against the needs of the
permanent population. We will be planning to enable dialogue
between the university and colleges and the providers of housing,
private landlords and ourselves in the near future.
The Housing Options And Advice Service Development
Following a service review in 2001, the Homelessness, Housing
Advice and Housing Needs teams were brought together as a generic
service operating from Lewis House in Manvers Street, Bath. During
2002/03, staff in the Housing & Regeneration team giving advice
on grants for home repairs and disabled facilities will move to
Lewis House to become part of the Housing Options & Advice
Service. This will further expand the role of the team, which will
focus on the prevention of homelessness, protection of residents’
housing rights and improvement of housing conditions across all
tenures.
The service was launched in April 2002, following a period of
team familiarisation and preparatory training in aspects of housing
law. Staff also spent some time familarising themselves with a new
IT system put in place to operate the Homeseekers pilot project.
The team principally operates from its city centre base in Lewis
House, Bath. Within the service 17 full and part time staff offer
advice and Homeless Reception Services for the people of Bath And
North East Somerset.
Underpinning the vision for the generic service was the need to
reach out to people beyond Bath city. For a range of different
reasons, a significant number of Bath & North East Somerset
residents are either unable to access the service in Bath or do not
consider Bath their principle centre of activity. From September
2002 the Housing Options & Advice Service will be launching
outreach pilots in the other major towns in Bath and North
East Somerset. During this pilot period, information will be
gathered on where users would be most likely to access the service
and permanent outreach services set up. To enable maximum take-up
of the service, home-visits will be offered to anyone who, due to
mobility or transport problems, cannot attend the Bath office or
one of the outreach services. This is already available on request,
ahead of the piloting of outreach surgeries. The service will also
be introducing a free Housing Options and Advice Line, an
additional option, running alongside the Homeseekers free-phone
service for applicants who wish to express an interest in a vacant
property.
A varied programme of publicity is planned, to ensure that as
wide a section of the community as possible is kept informed of the
service. Procedure Notes are being prepared, as are a wide range of
new information and advice leaflets.
Housing & Regeneration Developments
The Housing & Regeneration Team aims to improve housing
conditions across all tenures, enable the development of new
affordable housing and encourage empty properties back into
use.
The team has recently taken a number of steps to improve the
strategic direction and delivery of their private sector housing
services. In particular, the quality of information and support
available to landlords has been increased. Central to this is the
voluntary Accreditation Scheme, which has proved to be highly
successful. By March 2003, the number of bedspaces accredited
is expected to reach 2000. The scheme is supported by small,
cost-effective grants for basic fire precautions and
energy-efficiency improvements. In the near future, the team
will be working on a similar scheme for larger-scale landlords,
such as RSLs and providers of mass student accommodation. Where
encouragement and persuasion fail, the team will use their
enforcement powers to protect tenants. A risk-rating scheme
for all HMO’s has been introduced to enable the team to focus
resources where they will be most productive.