A to Z Index
My Area...


Subscribe to Inform news icon

and get local news for free.

Annual Monitoring Report

AMR for 2006-7 now published

Bath and North East Somerset Council (B&NES) has a statutory requirement under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act (2004) to submit an Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) the Secretary of State by 31st December each year. The third AMR produced by B&NES reports on the period 1st April 2006 to 31st March 2007.

 

The current AMR together with the previous versions can be downloaded from the right hand side of this page.

 

Introduction

Review and monitoring are key aspects of planning system. They are crucial to the successful delivery of the spatial vision and objectives of the adopted Local Plan and emerging Local Development Framework and are undertaken on a continuous pro-active basis. By identifying key outputs and trends, monitoring enables the building of a comprehensive evidence base against which policies and implementation mechanisms can be assessed.  The AMR assesses:

 

i)  the implementation of the local development scheme (LDS) and;

ii)  the extent to which plan objectives are being delivered through the operation plan polices and resultant development outputs.

 

The AMR should be read in conjunction with the B&NES Local Plan (adopted October 2007).

Review of Plan Production Progress

The AMR compares actual document preparation over the year against the targets and milestones for LDD production set out in the LDS. The AMR assesses whether the Council has met key targets and milestones, is on target to meet them, is falling behind schedule or will not meet them. If the Council is falling behind schedule or has failed to meet a key milestone, the AMR sets out reasons for this and identifies the steps to be taken to address any problems. The LDS may need to be updated in light of this assessment.

Monitoring of Plan Output

To assess the effectiveness of LDDs a monitoring system based on a range of output indicators have been developed to judge policy implementation. This includes: 

 

i)  assessing actual progress in terms of spatial objectives, policies and related targets, and reasons for the pace of progress;

ii)  considering planning policy implementation against national, regional, local and other targets;

iii)  evaluating the effectiveness of existing  polices and any need for adjustment or replacement as a result, particularly in the context of changing national or regional policy; and

iv) actions proposed to policies to address the issues raised.

 

Effective monitoring requires a set of appropriate indicators against which to monitor actual progress. There is an objectives-led approach to local development framework monitoring which:

 

i)  ensures a clear link from objectives through to policies, implementation programmes and to output targets and related indicators;

ii)  focuses on key objectives rather than monitoring a wide range of indicators not directly relevant to policy performance;

iii)   is consistent with wide local authority monitoring work;

iv)  links to key targets and indicators already being monitored at the regional level;

v)   allows transparency and accountability in terms of delivery; and

vi)  facilitates more informed policy and decision-making.