A to Z Index
Related Documents

BNES.9.1 Proof of evidence of Richard Herbert (Pdf 76Kb) BNES.9.1 Proof of evidence of Richard Herbert (Pdf 76Kb)

For help on viewing Related Documents please refer to the Help page

My Area...


Subscribe to Inform news icon

and get local news for free.

CPO 2004 Enquiry - Documents Submitted by Bath & North East Somerset Council

Proof of Evidence of Richard Herbert on behalf of Bath and North East Somerset Council

Public Inquiry May 2005

Document No: BNES/9/1

1. Qualifications and Experience

1.1 My name is Richard David Standish Herbert.

1.2 I am a Fellow of The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and have been a member of the RlCS since 1979.

1.3 l am a Partner at Strutt and Parker, Chartered Surveyors, of 13 Hill Street London W1J 5LQ. I have been with Strutt and Parker for 23 years, having been previously employed by Hillier Parker for 5 years.

1.4 Appendix I outlines the town centre retail/mixed use projects I have personally been involved with during my career.

1.5 I have acted for both developers and funding institutions with regard to the development of town centre and out-of-town retail schemes.

1.6 I advise investors and developers on all aspects of property ownership and its development.

1.7 My Firm has been retained by CGNU to provide advice on investment, development and agency matters as they relate to the area known as Southgate, Bath. Specifically, my Firm has been retained to provide advice on the development of Southgate by CGNU.

1.8 In my evidence I have adopted the abbreviations and definitions set out in the Glossary of Key Terms submitted as CD10.9.

2.  Introduction

2.1 Strutt & Parker as the development, investment and agency advisor to CGNU has been involved since the Southgate land holdings were acquired from the Prudential in 1995. I have been personally involved in the project since that time.

2.2 Strutt & Parker is specifically instructed to negotiate with individual parties who have current interests in the site to be developed in order to enable the development to proceed.

2.3 We are also instructed as letting advisors both in formulating a letting strategy, undertaking the pre-letting negotiations and organising and undertaking (in the future) the main letting campaign.

2.4 We are also a development consultant to CGNU for Southgate, which encompasses a number of roles namely the assessment of viability; the co-ordination of various discussions with current occupiers; co-ordination of the letting interests and negotiation with Bath & North East Somerset Council, to obtain a commercially acceptable framework for the merging of the current interests of CGNU and Bath & North East Somerset Council ("the Council") within the site and the granting of a new long leasehold interest to CGNU.

2.5 Our various roles involve us having close liaison with the various other team members acting on behalf of CGNU.

3. Current Position with Objectors to the CPO

3.1 Network Rail Infrastructure Limited

3.1.1 Negotiations commenced with Lunson Mitchenall, Network Rail's Advisors, in February 2002. Since that date there have been many meetings and telephone discussions to resolve the basis to take forward the works to rail station provided for in the planning permission for the Southgate redevelopment and the associated Section 106 Agreement.

3.1.2 The works principally involve:

a) The construction of a new 130 space car park within the Southgate basement car park for sole use by rail commuters.

b) As soon as the new basement car park is completed, the removal of the existing car park at track level on the north side of the station, together with the ramp leading up to it. This enables the rail station and the bus station to be linked by the creation of a new civic piazza.

c) The refurbishment of existing vaults, opened up by the removal of the car park ramp and which will front the newly created civic space. This will enable these vaults to be used for potential retail/restaurant/leisure uses.

d) The remodelling of the disabled car parking/drop off area1 short term stay car parking on the north and south of the existing station and provision of new passenger lifts to both platforms.

e) The reconfiguration of vehicular access to the existing station car park on the south side of the station.

3.1.3 Detailed Heads of Terms setting out how the works set out in paragraph 3.1.2 will be undertaken have been issued. The Agreement will ensure that the required number of commuter car parking spaces is maintained by constructing the new car park prior to demolishing the existing north side car park.

3.1.4 The basis on which the new car park will be owned and operated has been set out and I believe is agreed in principle.

3.1.5 Network Rail have instructed Rees & Freres to act on their behalf and documentation has been received to cover the necessary commercial terms and practical issues evolving from the works set out in paragraph 3.1.2 above. This documentation is being actively and urgently pursued to signature.

3.1.6 On 16 March 2005, Strutt & Parker met with Messrs Rapleys and Lunson Mitchenall. Messrs Rapleys have been retained by Network Rail to advise on CPO matters. We explained the details of the transaction to them and apart from one telephone conversation, where it was confirmed they were awaiting their client's instructions, no further communication has been received.

3.1.7 In parallel with discussions to address the commercial issues, discussions have  been ongoing directly with Network Rail and CGNU's Project Managers, Buro 4, to provide the necessary technical information to enable Network Rail to apply for the minor station alterations order and other operational  onsents that are required. The formal notice by Network Rail to the Strategic Rail Authority was submitted on 24 November 2004 to obtain the necessary minor station works approval.

3.2 First Great Western Limited

3.2.1 In our discussions with Network Rail they advised that First Great Western Limited's current franchise expires in 2006. This is prior to the necessary station alteration works being undertaken. For this reason, Network Rail required us to negotiate directly with them as opposed to their franchisee.

3.2.2 With Network Rail's agreement, we wrote to Mark Dix, the Estates Manager of First Great Western confirming that discussions with Network Rail regarding operational issues are almost at a conclusion. It was confirmed by Mark Dix that their objection is protective and they will withdraw their objection as soon as negotiations have been concluded with Network Rail.

3.3 Avon Valley Cyclery

3.3.1 This is a leaseholder of Network Rail.

3.3.2 An alternative unit is available to this operator within the refurbished station which will enable continuity of trade to be maintained.

3.3.3 Terms have been offered to this operator confirming the availability of a similar unit and that continuity of trade can be maintained. A meeting to discuss this further with the occupier is currently being arranged.

3.4 02 (UK) Ltd

3.4.1 This is a leaseholder of Network Rail. The subject property is a base station and antennae, situated on the existing station.

3.4.2 Confirmation has been sought that the tenant's equipment will be unaffected by the works or that in the event that any of the equipment needs to be moved, the costs of such relocation will be met by CGNU. A letter confirming any such costs will be met, was written on 8 April 2005 sent by Matthew Bodley of Drivers Jonas to Martin Law of 02's consultant Mono. On this basis, the occupier has confirmed its willingness to withdraw its objection.

3.5 Western Power Distribution (South West) Plc

3.5.1 Messrs Arups and Buro 4 have been in detailed negotiations with Western Power to agree technical details of the necessary design of the additional electrical equipment.

3.5.2 Agreement has been reached on the transfer of additional freehold land to Western Power for them to site the additional electrical equipment required.

3.5.3 Terms have been agreed (confirmation awaited) and solicitors are instructed to draw up the necessary documentation for signature.

3.6 First Group Plc, First Somerset & Avon Limited and First Group Holdings Plc

3.6.1 This is the current tenant of the existing bus station which has to be relocated in order to enable the Southgate scheme to be constructed.

3.6.2 Initial discussions were commenced in May 2003 to ensure that the proposed Section 106 Agreement that relates to the bus station was acceptable to the bus company and that the proposed new bus station met the technical criteria required.

3.6.3 The consented scheme had the approval of the bus company and they provided a letter of support to the Planning Application. The new bus station will be built by CGNU at its own cost.

3.6.4 Initial Heads of Terms relating to the commercial terms of the transaction were submitted by Strutt & Parker to First Group Plc in February 2004 and follow-up meetings held in April and July 2004. Further revised Heads of Terms were submitted on 7 February 2005 and more recently on 13 April 2005.

3.6.5 Over the last 6 weeks various technical meetings have taken place between CGNU's team and the First Bus team culminating with a meeting on 31 March 2005 where confirmation was received that all technical issues have now been agreed, subject to agreeing the detail of the specification, within an Operators Requirement (OR) Document.

3.6.6 The main points of principle, relating to rent, lease term and user clause etc are agreed but we continue to negotiate outstanding points of detail relating to the OR document.

3.7 Boots the Chemist Limited

3.7.1 Boots is an existing tenant within the Southgate scheme.

3.7.2 We have been negotiating a new unit for Boots within the new Southgate development.

3.7.3 Detailed Heads of Terms for a new flagship store of approximately 50,000 sq ft are very close to agreement and only a few points are outstanding. Solicitors are instructed to draw up the necessary document for signature.

3.8 Stylo Barratt

3.8.1 Negotiations commenced in August 2003.

3.8.2 The last remaining points in the Heads of Terms are close to agreement and solicitors will be instructed imminently to draw up the necessary documentation for signature.

3.9 Game Stores Plc

3.9.1 Documentation is due to be exchanged imminently.

3.10 Wallis Retail Properties Limited, Wallis, Arcadia and Redcastle Limited

3.10.1 Objection withdrawn.

3.11 Somerfield Stores Plc

3.11.1 A Notice under Section 25 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1954 ('a Section 25 Notice") was served on 7 March 2005 requiring termination on 1 March 2006.

3.11.2 A meeting was held on 15 April in order to seek to resolve Somerfield's concerns.

3.12 Rosebys

3.12.1 A Section 25 Notice was served on 22 March 2005. The termination date is 1 March 2006.

3.12.2 The Council has written to Messrs Rosebys solicitors on 22 March 2005 requesting copies of revised lay-outs as referred to in their objection.

3.13 Comet Group Plc

3.13.1 Comet have withdrawn their objection.

3.14 The Freeholders of Blenheim House

3.14.1 This party has withdrawn their objection.

4. Conclusions

4.1 Genuine attempts have been made to acquire the various interests required over a considerable period of time and following the making of the CPO this process has continued.