How much progress is being made to implement improvement plans
to sustain future improvement?
35 The
Council continues to work on ambitious plans that aim to deliver a
positive impact on the quality of life of local people. The scale
of one of these physical regeneration schemes in the centre of Bath
is very evident and demonstrate the complexity and difficulties in
getting the scheme this far. This and other regeneration schemes in
other parts of the area will provide new schools, better transport
infrastructure, and more homes that are affordable.
36 It is
refreshing its vision for the area following the elections in 2007
and is organising itself to deliver this. It continues to implement
its organisational restructuring and change programmes to help it
to deliver its plans. These include improved risk, data and project
management arrangements. The establishment of corporate groups to
over-see the management of change and the embedding of equalities
practices across the Council are a positive move. It also is
placing a sharper focus on climate change. In the last year, it has
introduced a number of initiatives aimed at mitigating the impacts
the Council’s activities have on this.
37
The Council continues to build its capacity by making
strong links with its partners and in particular with the PCT and
with the West of England partnership. These partnerships are being
used address local health, housing and transport problems across
the sub-region. It is also targeting extra resources and
introducing measures to deliver a sustainable improving performance
on processing planning applications.
Service inspections
38 An
important aspect of the role of the Relationship Manager is to work
with other inspectorates and regulators who also review and report
on the council’s performance. Relationship Managers share
information and seek to provide ‘joined up’ regulation to the
Council. During the last year the Council has received the
following assessments from other inspectorates, including the
following.
- Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) Annual Performance
Assessment of Adult Services.
- CSCI inspection of older people services in 2007, published in
January 2008.
- Joint OFSTED/ CSCI Annual Performance Assessment of Children
and Young Peoples Services.
- Benefit Fraud Inspectorate’s (BFI) annual assessment of the
Council’s Benefits Service for CPA.
39 We
have used these assessments as evidence to help arrive at the
Council’s overall CPA rating and to reach the Direction of Travel
judgement. The assessments have been separately reported to the
Council, and some of the significant findings are referred to in
the Direction of Travel assessment reported above.
The audit of the accounts and value for money
40 Your
appointed auditor in 2006/07, PwC, has reported separately to the
Audit Committee on the issues arising from the 2006/07 audit and
has issued:
- an audit report, providing an unqualified opinion on your
accounts and a conclusion on your value for money arrangements to
say that these arrangements are adequate on 18 January 2008;
and
- a report on the best value performance plan confirming that the
Plan has been audited.
Accounts
41 The
audit opinion on the Council’s accounts was expected to be issued
by 30 September. This was not possible because there were a number
of outstanding matters for resolution by the Council at that time,
including:
- valuation of the Bath Spa;
- reconciliation of the schools’ cash balances; and
- reconciliation of the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and
Losses and the Statement of Movement on the General Fund Balance to
other movements in the accounts.
42
Without resolution of these matters, the opinion on the Council's
accounts would have been qualified.
43
In 2006/07 local authorities were required to implement a
new Statement of Recommended Practice (SORP) in preparing their
annual financial statements. There were significant changes arising
from the SORP in terms of accounting entries and presentational
aspects, and comparative figures were affected by this.
44 There
were a number of changes in the team preparing the accounts
compared to 2005/06. A small number of material adjustments to the
draft accounts were required. In addition, there were other less
significant adjustments and presentational amendments that needed
to be made to ensure compliance with the SORP.
45 The
Council needs to ensure that more effective processes for liaison
between the team preparing the accounts and other suppliers of
financial information to support the balances in the accounts take
place.
46
A significant amount of work was required during the period of our
audit fieldwork to reconcile the schools' cash balances to its
general ledger.
47 As these reconciliations are fundamental controls, PwC
has repeatedly raised the
issue of the lack of a full reconciliation over the past few
years. Previously there
has been a gradual reduction in the net unreconciled balance.
Last year the
Council agreed that it would perform an exercise to clear down
this balance by
identifying and rectifying the remaining unreconciled items.
48 However, the
number of schools with unreconciled balances at the time of the
audit had increased compared to 2005/06 and regular monthly
reconciliations of these balances did not take place during the
year. It is important that the Council puts in place procedures to
ensure that these balances are fully reconciled on a periodic basis
throughout the year so that reconciling items are identified, fully
understood and cleared on a timely basis.
49 As
noted above there were significant changes to the format and
content of the accounts arising from the new SORP and with the
likely introduction of International Financial Reporting Standards
in the future, it is important that the Council has in place
sufficient financial reporting expertise and appropriate systems
and processes to prepare the accounts.
Use of Resources
50 The findings
of the auditor are an important component of the CPA framework
described above. In particular the Use of Resources score is
derived from the assessments made by the auditor in the following
areas.
- Financial reporting (including the preparation of the accounts
of the Council and the way these are presented to the public).
- Financial management (including how financial management is
integrated with strategy to support Council priorities).
- Financial standing (including the strength of the Council's
financial position).
- Internal control (including how effectively the Council
maintains properstewardship and control of its finances).
- Value for money (including an assessment of how well the
Council balancesthe costs and quality of its services).
51 For
the purposes of the CPA your auditor has assessed the Council’s
arrangements for use of resources in these five areas as
follows.
Table 2
|
Element |
Assessment |
|
Financial reporting |
2 out of 4 |
|
Financial management |
3 out of 4 |
|
Financial standing |
3 out of 4 |
|
Internal control |
2 out of 4 |
|
Value for money |
3 out of 4 |
|
Overall assessment of the Audit Commission |
3 out of 4 |
(Note: 1 =lowest, 4 =highest)
52
The results of the assessment have been reported to the Council and
the areas for improvement based on the criteria devised by the
Audit Commission for the audit year 2006/07 have been highlighted.
These criteria are subject to change for 2007/08 and it is
important that the Council identifies any new requirements in order
that they can be addressed. The areas for improvement identify what
the Council needs to do in order to move to the next level. In many
cases these relate to requirements to move to level 4 from level
3.
53
The key matters arising from this year's assessment are as
follows.
- The Council has maintained its good performance in respect of
financial management and has improved its performance with regard
to its management of its asset base. Its asset management plan has
now been embedded within the organisation.
- Procedures for budget setting and monitoring have been
maintained at a consistent level over the last year. The Council’s
financial strategy links to its strategic objectives and reflects
the improvement and national priorities set out in its corporate
plan.
- The Council’s service planning process is designed to
incorporate business and financial planning and links into budgets.
Comprehensive reporting to members includes details of performance
against key financial and non-financial indicators as well as
setting out achievements, risks, developmental opportunities and
updates on corporate projects with financial and performance
implications. There is separate specific reporting on planned
savings and risks to achievement as part of the overall financial
reporting.
- The Council maintained its overall spending within its revised
budget for 2006/07. In general, we were satisfied that the
movements between the original and revised budgets could not have
been reasonably foreseen at the time when the original budget was
set.
- Reserves levels have been set and reserves have been maintained
at these levels for 2006/07. The levels set are based on an
understanding of the Council’s future needs and risks and clearly
reported to members.The Council has maintained its performance in
relation to its arrangements for managing its business risks having
made good progress with these in prior years. Processes for
maintaining and reviewing its risk register have been formalised
and a member committee is in place which is responsible for risk
management and the provision of training for members and staff.
These processes have become embedded in 2006/07.
- There is currently no overall business continuity plan in place
and consequently, the Council’s arrangements for maintaining a
sound system of internal control have been assessed as not meeting
minimum requirements as this became a mandatory requirement in
2006/07. Other than this, the Council met all of the level 3
requirements in this area and so it is important that such a plan
is put in place.
- Adequate procedures to promote and ensure probity and propriety
in the conduct of Council business are in place. The Council should
be more proactive in its role to raise standards of ethical
behaviour amongst members and staff and in assessing how
effectively members comply with ethical codes. In particular its
whistle-blowing policy needs to be more actively publicised.
- Audit Commission profiles indicate that the Council’s
expenditure is low relative to others, with overall expenditure per
head of population in the lowest quartile. In particular,
Education, Environment, Planning and Transport and Culture are in
the lowest quartile. Notwithstanding the low level of expenditure
per head on Education, school attainment levels at key stages 2 and
3 continue to be in the upper quartile when compared to other
authorities.
- Expenditure in the areas of Learning Disability and Adult
Mental Health continues to be relatively high. Spending in the
former area is being addressed by a number of strategies including
the use of pooled budgets, attempts to reduce high cost placements
and a day services strategy. Efficiency savings schemes have also
been implemented. Since the end of 2007, the Council has begun to
implement a major change programme to deliver Adult Mental Health
Services (and Older People's Mental Health Services) in partnership
with the local PCT.
- Planning costs remain at the top of the upper quartile and the
Council has a relatively poor performance in terms of determining
applications within the target time. The Council has recently
streamlined its development control committees and revised its
delegation limits in order to address these issues.
- One of the aims of the Council’s Corporate Plan to the end of
31 March 2007 was to minimise increases in Council Tax. The Audit
Commission profiles illustrate that the Band D level for the tax
continues to be below the median level for all councils.
- In previous years the Council experienced difficulties
delivering its capital programme and in early 2006/07 it
implemented a number of steps to improve its processes. This has
led to improvements in the way it manages its capital
programme.
- The Council has continued to develop its performance management
systems and is successfully embedding the behaviours necessary to
support this following significant investment in its culture change
programme.
- The Council has plans in place to deliver the Government’s
Efficiency Review target of 7.5 per cent over the three-year period
to 31 March 2008. The current plan forecasts a cumulative
over-achievement against the target of 1.7 per
cent.