A REVIEW OF PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN THE BATHAVON AREA
Bathampton Primary School, Batheaston C of E Primary
School, Bathford C of E Primary School
A Discussion Paper
WHY ARE WE REVIEWING THIS AREA?
All primary schools in Bath & North East Somerset are to be
reviewed over the four years between September 2003 and July 2007.
Each school will initially be reviewed alongside its partner
schools in a geographical area. At the end of each Area Review
elected Councillors may decide that some changes (school closures,
new schools, enlarging schools etc.) appear to be necessary and
initiate a further consultation process focussing on the school(s)
affected. It is equally possible that Councillors may simply
acknowledge that the pattern of school provision is working
effectively and that no changes are required in the short or
medium-term.
The process to be followed when undertaking an Area Review has
been the subject of wide and lengthy consultation. It was finally
approved by the School Organisation Committee (a body independent
of the Council) on 22 July 2003.
The schools named below are considered in this Review.
- Bathampton Primary School
- Batheaston CofE Primary School
- Bathford CofE Primary School
INTRODUCTION
The first stage of the Review involves the gathering of
information on the following:-
- current numbers on roll (update January 05 Plasc )
- historical numbers on roll (1999-2004)
- anticipated numbers of children in the area (2005 and
beyond)
- levels of recruitment against Standard Number / Planned
Admission Number
- unit cost per pupil
- home addresses of pupils on roll
- level of surplus or deficit of places
- levels of educational achievement
On 26 April 2005, a draft version of this document was
circulated to the Headteacher of each school covered by the
Review.
On 9th May 2005 a revised version containing amendments,
clarifications of facts and some initial conclusions was issued to
the Headteacher and Chair of Governors of each school covered by
the Review, the Headteacher and Chair of Governors of the secondary
schools serving Bath, senior officers of the Education Service, the
Bath & Wells Diocesan Board of Education, the Roman Catholic
Diocese of Clifton and Councillors representing the wards in which
the schools are located. The document was also circulated to
members of the Education, Youth, Culture & Leisure Overview
& Scrutiny Panel in order to inform their discussions prior to
the public meeting to be held on 23 May 2005.
School Organisation Plan
Each school has been assessed against policies, established
through the School Organisation Plan, regarding school size. The
School Organisation Plan states that;
- Infant and junior schools should be at least one form of entry
and a maximum of three with a standard number between 30 and
90.
- No infant school should have 60 or fewer children on roll.
- No junior school should have 90 or fewer children on roll.
- Urban/suburban primary schools should be at least one form of
entry and a maximum of two with a standard number between 30 and
60.
- No urban/suburban primary school should have fewer than 180
children on roll.
- The maximum desirable size for an all through primary school is
420 pupils.
- At September 2004 all schools meet the criteria regarding
planned admission number and size.
Information provided to the SOP in July 2004 indicated the area
had a relatively high level of unfilled places with most of these
being at one school. A planned housing development has
received outline planning permission. The possibility of this
development means that it may be necessary to provide additional
capacity during the lifetime of the Plan. In view of this it
is proposed that this area be reviewed in the next round of
reviews.
The School Organisation Plan agreed on 17 July 2001 stated that
“the LEA’s preferred option for school organisation at Key Stages 1
and 2 is all-through primary schools. This also includes the
Foundation Stage in nursery and reception classes.” All three
schools covered by this Review are all-through primary schools. No
school operates a nursery class.
Of the three schools covered by this Review two are Church
schools. Any changes in the area may result in a change in the
proportion of denominational places in Bath & North East
Somerset and if such changes reduced the proportion of
denominational places this would require the support of the
relevant Diocese. At present, approximately 54% of primary school
places in Bath & North East Somerset are in Church schools. In
the Bathavon area the percentage is 75%.
All schools have also been assessed under the Authority’s Asset
Management Plan (AMP). The AMP is concerned with the Condition,
Suitability and Sufficiency of schools. The Key Data sheets at the
back of the document show the position at these schools in relation
to the AMP headings
The Context
A map showing the location of the schools is attached. A wide
area map showing where pupils live is also attached. For legal
reasons it is necessary to state that the maps have been reproduced
from the Ordnance Survey with the permission of the Controller of
Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Ó Crown Copyright under License
Number 100023334.
Population data from the Primary Care Trust shows the position
at March 2004 in the wards in which these schools are located.
Levels of Educational Achievement
There are various measures of educational performance. Simple
examination of headline results may not reveal the success (or
otherwise) of a school.
Care must be taken when analysing results of small year groups
and making comparisons with schools that are significantly
different in size. In small schools one pupil can have a very
marked effect on the percentage figures. OFSTED makes the following
statement:
|
Care should be taken when analysing the results of small year
groups and small schools. The effect of one additional pupil
on, for example, a school percentage measure can be considerable,
whereas in larger schools the effect will be less marked.
This does not mean that analysing the performance of small cohorts
is invalid. Rather it means that the findings from such
analyses should be interpreted carefully, and may need to be
augmented with other information or considered over more than one
year. |
Timescales and Consultation
The Overview & Scrutiny Panel will hold a public meeting to
hear contributions from invited stakeholders. This will take place
on 23 May 2005 at the Brunswick Room, Guildhall, Bath beginning at
5.00 p.m.
A meeting is to be arranged for Bath & North East Somerset
Councillors representing the relevant wards.
The document will be further considered by the Overview &
Scrutiny Panel (OSP) at its meeting on 16th June 2005.
The final paper will be considered by the Council Executive
which meets at the Guildhall, Bath on 29 June 2005.
KEY DATA
- Numbers on Roll, Forecasts & Surplus Places (Sufficiency
1)
- Level of Recruitment against Standard Number
- Financial Information
- Outstanding Planned Maintenance (Condition)
- Site and Building Areas (Sufficiency 2)
- Educational Standards
- Suitability
SUITABILITY ASSESSMENTS
In conjunction with sufficiency and condition assessments,
suitability assessments help in the targeting of resources where
they can have the greatest effect in raising standards and
maximising value for money. The assessments help in identifying the
educational impact of any deficiencies in accommodation, may
identify a need for additional accommodation or improvements to
existing accommodation.
The definitions below will assist readers in assessing the scale
of the suitability problems faced by the schools within this
Review.
Readers are reminded that the issues identified by the
Suitability Assessments represent both the findings of work
undertaken during the Autumn Term 2002-03 and updated to reflect
accommodation changes since then. The latest update was
December 2004.
Each school received a copy of their Assessment and Headteachers
were invited to comment on the findings. The issues
identified below represent the agreed suitability issues facing the
school at the time of the Assessment.
Category A - Unable to teach curriculum.
This is most likely to be associated with numbers and types of
teaching spaces available. There should be enough appropriate
spaces to accommodate all pupils for the whole of the
curriculum
Category B - Teaching methods inhibited.
Unsuitability of spaces may mean that schools’ preferred teaching
methods are inhibited. This may be associated with numbers and
types of teaching spaces, or with the size and other aspects of
spaces
Category C - Management or organisation of
school affected adversely.
Unsuitability of spaces and/or the way they relate to each other
may affect the organisation or management of the school
Category D - Pupil or staff morale or pupil
behaviour affected adversely.
Unsuitability of spaces may affect pupil or staff morale or
pupil behaviour.
The Schools Asset Manager has stated that known suitability
issues at the three schools covered by this Review are as
follows:
Bathampton Primary School
The school comprises an accessible two storey 1890’s
building. There are sufficient teaching spaces for the number
on roll but all are generally undersized: classrooms, hall,
IT room, SEN area. The admin accommodation has no known
suitability issues.
Batheaston CofE Primary School
The school comprises four separate blocks housing the main
school building, a Horsa hall/dining, double Elliot temporary
classroom and music/small group spaces on a very constricted site.
The school has asked that we also note that the hall is
inaccessible and has multiple use for assembly/PE/dining, is used
for out of school activities and a recent Ofsted inspection
considered it difficult to deliver the curriculum in this space.
The hall has no fixed PE equipment and health and safety
issues associated with slippery floors and poor acoustics.
Small group spaces and library are all situated on circulation
routes. The IT space suffers from temperature
variations. School administrative areas are undersized and
the staffroom is both inaccessible and undersized. There are
insufficient staff toilets.
Bathford CofE Primary School
The school comprises a single storey main building with two
inaccessible poor condition Elliot temporary buildings at the
rear. The hall has multiple use for assembly/PE/dining and is
so undersized the full curriculum cannot be delivered. It is
also unable to cater for Breakfast or After School Clubs to cater
for recognised needs in the village. The library is situated
in one of the Elliot buildings and there is no SEN space nor other
small group spaces. The school has asked that we also note
the undersized staffroom and inadequate staff toilet
provision
Data Sets
Numbers on Roll, Forecasts & Surplus Places
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numbers on Roll, Forecasts & Surplus Places |
|
PAN Sept 2004 |
Capacity |
Sept 99 |
Sept 00 |
Sept 01 |
Sept 02 |
Sept 03 |
Average NOR
99-03 |
Sept 04 |
Surplus Places Sept O4 |
Surplus Places Forecast Sept 08 |
|
School |
Category |
|
|
|
|
|
Bathampton Primary |
Community |
15 |
105 |
102 |
108 |
107 |
112 |
120 |
110 |
117 |
-12 |
|
|
Batheaston CofE Primary |
Controlled |
30 |
219 |
207 |
206 |
219 |
213 |
215 |
212 |
211 |
8 |
|
|
Bathford CofE Primary |
Controlled |
25 |
175 |
109 |
118 |
129 |
127 |
122 |
121 |
131 |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
70 |
499 |
418 |
432 |
455 |
452 |
457 |
|
459 |
40 |
60 |
|
Average |
|
23 |
166 |
139 |
144 |
152 |
151 |
152 |
|
153 |
13 |
20 |
Notes
PAN means Planned Admission Number. This figure equates to the
number of pupils the school must admit if demand exists. PAN
replaced Standard Number for admissions from September 2004.
Net Capacity is the physical capacity of the school and shows
the number of places available. It is derived from a DfES
formula.
Surplus places mean unfilled places. Not all unfilled places are
surplus. The calculation of surplus places takes account only of
those schools where the number of pupils is fewer than the number
of places available. Shortfalls of places in schools are not
counted.
The purpose of showing the average number on roll over the five
years previous to 2004/05 is to ensure that an unusual variation in
admissions in one year does not provide a distorted picture.
Forecast numbers for individual schools are not included. It can
be seen that the total number on roll at September 2004 is 110% of
that at September 1999. Forecasts indicate that by September
2007 the total number on roll will be 92% of the 1999 figure.
An increase in surplus places is predicted but the Bailbrook
housing development needs to be borne in mind.
Population Data – Bathavon
|
Ward |
Age 0 |
Age 1 |
Age 2 |
Age 3 |
Age 4 |
Age 5 |
|
Bathavon North |
51 |
79 |
56 |
65 |
57 |
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source : B&NES Primary Care Trust
Data valid as at March 2004
Numbers of children in this area show some periodic fluctuation
but overall there is little indication that the number of unfilled
spaces will increase or decrease
significantly.
Levels of Recruitment against Standard Number / Planned
Admission Number
|
School |
|
1999 |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Average |
|
|
SN |
Intake |
% |
SN |
Intake |
% |
SN |
Intake |
% |
SN |
Intake |
% |
SN |
Intake |
% |
PAN |
Intake |
% |
% of SN |
|
Bathampton Primary |
15 |
16 |
107 |
15 |
15 |
100 |
15 |
15 |
100 |
15 |
14 |
93 |
15 |
19 |
127 |
15 |
16 |
107 |
106 |
|
Batheaston CofE Primary |
30 |
24 |
80 |
30 |
31 |
103 |
30 |
30 |
100 |
30 |
25 |
83 |
30 |
27 |
90 |
30 |
29 |
97 |
92 |
|
Bathford CofE Primary |
16 |
18 |
113 |
16 |
24 |
150 |
20 |
25 |
125 |
20 |
21 |
105 |
20 |
21 |
105 |
25 |
15 |
60 |
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
61 |
58 |
95 |
61 |
70 |
115 |
65 |
70 |
108 |
65 |
60 |
92 |
65 |
67 |
103 |
70 |
60 |
86 |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
Levels of recruitment are shown as percentages as changes to
Standard Number were implemented at several schools
over the period September 1997 to September 2002. This was often
as a result of the infant class size legislation.
Standard Number (SN) was abolished from September 2004 and
replaced by Planned Admission Number (PAN)
Summary and Conclusions
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Aims and Objectives
The aims of the Review are to:
- Maintain and improve educational standards
- Maximise the use of existing resources (land, buildings and
funding)
- Increase access to high quality facilities for children, staff
and the community
- Make the choice of a local school the natural and easy choice
for parents
Bathampton Primary School is slightly over capacity but not to
such an extent to cause concern. Pupils achieve very high
standards and attainment is well above both the LEA and national
average across both Key Stages. There is sufficient
accommodation for this school although some teaching areas are
undersized. However these cannot be resolved without major
remodelling and this school would not be a priority for investment
under present Asset Management Plan priorities. The school
site is more than sufficient and there is more than double the
required playing field area. Consideration could be given to
reducing the site area of the school to no more than that required
for a 210 place primary school, ie a school of twice the present
size.
No action is required in relation to this school.
Batheaston CofE Primary School is almost full. Educational
outcomes are above the LEA and national average across both Ky
Stages. There are a significant number of suitability issues
.Some of the staff and administration deficiencies are to be
resolved by the school itself using devolved formula capital.
The deteriorating condition of the Horsa dining/hall and double
Elliot classrooms coupled with the large amount of outstanding
repairs and maintenance for the school is of concern. However
these issues cannot be resolved without major capital
investment. The school is situated on a constrained site and
there would be little flexibility to alleviate these
problems. There is no on site playing field although
the school has access to an undersized field across the road.
No action is recommended at this school.
Bathford CofE Primary School presently has a large number of
unfilled spaces. However proposed housing developments both
in Bathford and Bailbrook Lane will generate need for pupil places
which it is anticipated to reduce the surplus. The planned
reduction of PAN from 25 to 22 for September 2005 will also reduce
net capacity to 154. Educational outcomes are above the LEA
and national average across both Key Stages. There are a
significant number of suitability issues associated with the
school, particularly the absence of a hall. The deteriorating
condition of the two Elliot buildings coupled with the large amount
of outstanding repairs and maintenance for the school is of
concern. The school site is more than sufficient and there is
more than double the required playing field area.
It is recommended the unfilled places be monitored and all
options to alleviate are considered and that consideration could be
given to reducing the site area of the school to no more than that
required for a 210 place primary school.