A to Z Index
My Area...


Subscribe to Inform news icon

and get local news for free.

Supporting People Service Review 

Service: Marlborough Lane. Service Address: 7 Marlborough Lane, Bath. Service ID: 49. Service Provider: Bristol Churches Housing Association. Service Provider Address: 1-3 Surrey Street, Bristol, BS2 8PS. National ID Number: 10017. Date: May 2005. Review Officer: Lesley Hutchinson on behalf of Bath & NE Somerset Supporting People Team.

   1.      Report Summary

Bristol Churches Housing Association (BCHA) provides and accommodation based floating service to people with mental ill health from B&OME communities at 7 Marlborough Lane, Bath.  A review of this service was carried out by Lesley Hutchinson on behalf of Bath and North East Somerset (B&NES) Supporting People Team in May 2005.

The review found that BCHA provide a good service and makes several recommendations for service improvements. The service is strategically relevant to the B&NES 5 Year Supporting People Programme though needs to ensure that a short term service is delivered and that service user move into independent living within a two year period. The service achieved a level B in 5 of the 6 core objectives of the QAF and was found to be value for money with regard to unit cost but not for cost per support hour. Service user reported they were pleased with the quality of the accommodation and service. BCHA are commended for the amount of preparation they put into organising the review and are particularly commended on their resource manual. 

 

2. Introduction to Agency

BCHA was established in 1976 and became part of the Places for People Group in 1999. The overarching vision for the Group and the HA is, ‘creating neighbourhoods of choice for all’ demonstrating the commitment to look at and support the needs of diverse communities.

BCHA is a large organisation that employs 90 staff. It directly manages 129 units of supported housing including homeless hostels; 305 units of sheltered housing and 124 units of floating support. It has 369 units managed by other agencies; 700 leasehold units and 1950 general need’s units. BCHAs services support approximately 558 service users at anyone time. They have Supporting People contracts with 5 Local Authorities including all of our cross authority partners and Wiltshire.

BCHA has maintained its autonomy though has benefited from sharing skills, information and learning from the specialist expertise from some of the other member of the Places for People Group, for example through close working with New Leaf they have developed service outcomes.

2.1 Brief History

Marlborough Lane is a large semi detached Victorian house. It is five minutes walk from Bath city centre and is a two minute walk from Victoria Park, its garden backs onto Charlotte Street car park and there are three car parking spaces at the back of the building.

The scheme has been in operation since 1994 and its primary purpose is to provide low level housing related support to people with mental ill health to support them to achieve and maintain independence. The scheme is specifically from black and minority ethnic communities and is the only service specifically for people from B&OME communities in Bath.

When the scheme first opened tenants were given assured tenancies, thus giving them long term security of tenure. However, since 2002 and the introduction of Supporting People the service aims and objectives have changed and the service now promotes recovery and independent living. Tenants are now offered assured shorthold tenancy agreements and are expected to move through the service and develop independence within two years. At the point of review 5 of the 6 service users had lived at the scheme for over 3 years and 1 person for over 11 years. The person that has lived at the scheme for over 11 years has an assured tenancy and considers this their home for life.

2.2 Monitoring Information

          Period

KPI 2

    Percentage of Availability

Percentage of Utilisation

Percentage of Staffing Levels

2003 Quarter 1

Not required

100%

100%

85.22%

2003 Quarter 2

Not required

100%

100%

82.58%

2003 Quarter 3

Not required

100%

100%

74.47%

2003 Quarter 4

Not required

Not available

Not available

Not provided

 

 

 

 

 

2004 Quarter 1

Not provided

100%

100%

102.53%

2004 Quarter 2

Not provided

100%

100%

95.21%

2004 Quarter 3

100%

100%

97.44%

87.50%



KPI 2: Percentage of service users who moved on in a planned way

The service has been operating at full availability and almost full utilisation from the onset of Supporting People programme to the commencement of the review. Staffing levels have been consistently high except for 2003 quarter 3 which was caused by a long-term staff illness and BCHA had to find appropriate cover for this period. Key performance indicator for service users who moved through the service for Quarter 1 and 2 of 2004 has not been provided, these are a requirement of the ODPM and need to be submitted.

2.3 Service Capacity and Funding

Service

Units

Support Staff

Management Staff

Funding

Marlborough Lane

6

12 Hours per week delivered by two staff

3.5 Hours per week

£22,626.00

(SP funding only)

Overall Contract Value for Services:

 

 

 

£22,626.81



Bristol Churches Housing Association work 35 hours per week and all staff are based at the Head Office in Bristol and come to Bath to visit the service users of the scheme.

There is no reporting of any additional monies being paid to this service.

3. Strategic Relevance

Marlborough Lane was found to be strategically relevant to the Supporting People Programme in B&NES.  The service provides housing related support and does not offer personal care or general social care.

The service is designated a short term service and aims to support people to develop independent living skills and move into independent accommodation within 2 years, however 5 of the 6 service users have lived at the property for over three years and one of these for over 11 years. All service users have assured shorthold tenancies except for the service user who has lived in the property for 11 years, they have an assured tenancy and consider this their home for life. The figures clearly demonstrate that BCHA are not meeting the aim of a short term service and are not supporting people into independent accommodation in two years.

5 of the 6 current service users had been discharged under Section 117 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and are still subject to the CPA approach. Where service users have been discharged under the Act they are eligible for Supporting People funding and not continued social services funding for housing related support services.

The Marlborough Lane service meets some of the objectives set out in the B&NES Supporting People Five Year Strategy including: providing choice to service users (particularly those from B&ME communities); inclusive planning; preventing homelessness; crisis prevention and by tackling social exclusion. In addition to this the Five Year Strategy identified a lack of support services for people with mental ill health and aims to increase services for this service user group. Given this identified need the service is relevant to the B&NES programme.

Overall the support being delivered in Marlborough Lane is low level and was not found to be in conflict with the aims of housing related support  and fits with national and local strategic guidance for this.

4. Legal / ODPM Guidance on group and type of service

In spring 2003, The Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister asked the Social Exclusion Unit to consider what more could be done to reduce exclusion among adults with mental health problems. The project focused on people of working age, and asked two questions:

  • What more can be done to help adults with mental health problems to enter and retain work?
  • How can adults with mental health problems secure the same opportunities for social participation and access to services as the general population?

The report sets out a 27 point action plan to bring together the work of Government departments and other organisations in a concerted effort to challenge attitudes, enable people to fulfil their aspirations, and significantly improve outcomes and opportunities for this excluded group. Action falls into six categories:

  • Stigma and Discrimination – A sustained programme to try and challenge negative attitudes and promote awareness of peoples rights
  • The role of Health and Social Care in tackling social exclusion – implementing evidence based practice in vocational services and enabling reintegration into the community.
  • Employment – Giving people with mental health problems a real chance of sustained paid work reflecting their skills and experiences.
  • Supporting Families and Community Participation – enabling people to lead fulfilling lives the way they choose.
  • Getting the basics right – access to decent homes, financial advice and affordable transport.
  • Making it Happen – Clear arrangements for leading this programme and maintaining momentum.

(Mental Health and Social Exclusion, SEU Report Summary, June 2004)

The review did not identify any further ODPM specific steers for this client group under Supporting People, so recommendations have been drawn from above in reference to the role of Health and Social Care, and Getting the Basics right.

There is no national steer on legacy high support services for people with mental ill health, yet in the main this group alongside learning disabilities represent much of the high cost individual long term expenditure for the Supporting People programme. Contracts can be renewed at the same level only when there is ample evidence they are high quality and represent value for money, though this must be within the overall limits imposed by the strategic direction for Supporting People that decides where housing related support fits as a funding stream and to what extent it will contribute.

5. Quality Assessment Framework (QAF) Outcomes

The objectives were assessed as follows:

Core Objective

Self Assessment

Validated Score

C1.1 Needs and Risk Assessment

B

B

C1.2 Support Planning

B

B

C1.3 Security, Health and Safety

B

B

C1.4 Protection from Abuse

B

C

C1.5 Fair Access, Diversity and Inclusion

B

B

C1.6 Complaints

B

B



The policies and procedures are clearly in place for all areas of the QAF and were well evidenced during validation and through interviews with the management staff, however the support staff did not demonstrate the same in depth knowledge of these, though they were aware of basic procedures and were committed to delivering them. Service users were aware of the majority of the policies except that of Protection from Abuse. There was no information obviously available on this in the building however it was due to be raised at the next house meeting.

The service should be commended for producing the complaints procedure leaflet in key languages, Braille and audio tape and for the amount of preparation and planning it put into the review. The validation of the written policies and procedures was particularly easy to assess because of this preparation.

6. Consultation

Staff at BCHA were interviewed as part of the review, this included interviews with the Supported Housing Manager, Hostels Manager, and one of the tenancy support officers.  2 of the 6 service users were interviewed (33%).

Key stakeholders interviewed including: Community Mental Health Team, Social Services Adult Duty Team and the Homeseekers Team at B&NES Council.

6.1 Consultation Findings

Service users at Marlborough Buildings

Both service users interviewed had lived at Marlborough Lane for over 3 years.

  • One service user felt ready to move out and was waiting for a property to become available through the Housing Register. They had been on the waiting list since 1999 and were hoping for a one bedroom flat to become available through the ‘move on’ scheme. They had recently started to receive bulletins. They had always known that they would move out of Marlborough Lane when they were ready and felt they no longer needed support but would like some help when they move into their own place though thinks they will probably get this from friends rather than BCHA staff. 
  • One service user liked their flat and did not want to move from it.
  • Both service users see their support worker every 3 weeks, the meetings take place in their flats at Marlborough Lane. At these meetings they discuss maintenance and general housing issues eg, rent, housing benefit, letters from the LA etc and generally how they were feeling.
  • One service user had recently carried out a Risk Assessment with their worker and stated they were now signing their Support Plans and notes on the support they receive after each session. They remember reviewing their support plan. Neither service user could produce their support plan though one stated they new exactly where it was.
  • Both service users attended the house meetings which took place every 3 or 4 months and one felt these could be more frequent as there was no real socialising or interaction between people in the house unless at the meetings or if there was a complaint about noise.
  • One service user wanted to be able to use the communal area and for this to have comfortable chairs and a TV in, though understood that there had been problems and this was why it was no longer used and only had one chair in.
  • Both service users were supported by their worker initially when they met other support staff, eg, Psychiatrist and CPN but now this support was not needed and they went to the meetings on their own.
  • Overall both service users felt the support service they received was good.
  • Both service users said the house was stable and that only one person had moved out and a new person had moved in since they had lived there.
BCHA Staff
  • Referrals come to the larger BCHA team meetings and are allocated to team members for follow up. Potential tenants are assessed when a vacancy becomes available.
  • BCHA started using Support Plans soon after Supporting People came in however there has not been any training in this. Despite this service provision is much better and service users are getting used to ‘owning’ their own support plans. Reviews now take place and dates are set in advance.
  • Work in partnership and attend CPA meetings, identified clear lines of responsibility at these meetings.
  • Meetings with service users mainly take place in their own rooms at Marlborough Buildings.
Other Stakeholders
  • CMHT refer to the service when there is a vacancy and identified a clear need for the service.
  • CMHT worked in partnership with the service support workers when the need arose, often that was at the beginning of the service users tenancy.
  • People are rarely housed through the housing register at the scheme as places rarely become available. One LA housing worker had not heard of the scheme before.

Homeseekers Team were aware of one person on the Assisted Move On scheme but  did not recall being contacted about this

7. Evidence and Risk Assessment

The review of Marlborough Lane did not identify any serious health and safety or financial risks to the present service. It should be noted that BCHA will be accredited by an independent consultant later in the year. The accreditation would identify any financial concerns.

The BCHA management team and Places for People Group demonstrated  clear and accountable leadership. Policies and procedures were all in place and there was a clear process for training staff in these. There was a clear policy on the ‘Protection from Abuse’, however it had not been shared with service users, though it is planned to be discussed at the next house meeting.

The service users value the support provided, though the service needs to encourage service users to consider their housing options for the future rather than rely solely upon social housing.

The review found that the unfurnished and unused communal lounge could be improved. In addition to this the onsite staff office was also clearly unused and did not have basic facilities in it, eg, tea and coffee. The room had recently been flooded and still smelt of damp this was not conducive to holding meetings or writing up service user records.

8. Value for Money

Cost per unit (to Supporting People) per week:        £72.32       

Regional Upper and Lower Quartile:          £78.31            £215.02       

(Drawn from 339 comparable services)

National Upper and Lower Quartile:           £87.52            £261.85                     

(Drawn from 2848 comparable services)

It should be noted that these comparitors are interim contract values and not post review.

The unit cost falls at the lower end of both regional and national quartiles. The review found this appropriate for provision of housing related support.

Cost per frontline support hour (to Supporting People): £28.00

This is a high hourly cost when compared to the draft upper and lower benchmarks for the South West Region which is £18.92 to £21.95

9. Review Outcome / Recommendations and Impact

  1. BCHA’s policies and procedures are clearly written and regularly reviewed. Managers roll out new policies and procedures to staff through staff meetings and supervision. Support plans have been in place since the onset of Supporting People, however BCHA have developed new assessment and support plan documentation and are training staff in the use of this. Staff describe the new documentation as an improvement and service users now ‘own’ their support plan. Risk assessments had been recently implemented and service users found this useful for contingency planning. Health and safety checks are carried out each month and service users know what to do in the event of an emergency.
  2. BCHA have developed a comprehensive guide to local and national resources for the diverse needs of its service users. This resource pack is available to staff and service users, however it would be more accessible to service users if it were placed in the communal lounge.
  3. The service has achieved level B in all areas of the QAF except that of Protection from Abuse. BCHA is complimented for the standard it has achieved and it is recommended that it works towards a level A for the annual self assessment. With regard to Protection from Abuse, although the policy is in place, service users are not familiar with this. The policy is due to be discussed with service users at the next house meeting. The review recommends that the service strives for a level B in this area.
  4. Referrals to Marlborough Lane are assessed when there is a vacancy at the service, consequently the service does not hold an assessed waiting list and does not demonstrate a clear indicator of demand for the service. Anecdotal evidence from stakeholders and the needs mapping in the Supporting People 5 Year Strategy identifies a lack of capacity for service users with mental ill health, however BCHA could not demonstrate this. As the only B&OME service in B&NES, it is recommended that BCHA develop a method of monitoring the ongoing demand for the service.
  5. Support staff attend appointments and meetings with service users and other agencies as appropriate. However there is limited contact with local agencies that current service users are not engaged with. It is recommended that the Support staff have a greater presence in Bath and promote the service to the wider B&OME community and join / attend local groups and meetings that are relevant to the support service provided. The lack of a presence is identified as a gap and weakness.
  6.  Marlborough Lane is described as a short term service however the evidence found that 5 out of 6 service user have lived at the scheme for over 3 years. Given the lack of shortage of mental health services in B&NES and this being the only B&OME service it is recommended that the service falls within the categorisation of short term and that BCHA focus on supporting service users to find suitable independentaccommodation and do not rely upon social housing solely. The review found no evidence of work with the private rented sector or consideration of other move on options and recommends that this is explored.
  7. It is recommended that we address the issue of the tenant that has resided at the property for over 11 years separately – clearly this tenant is not receiving a short term service, thus the options are to either: a) make this service chargeable for the service user or  b) increase the capacity of the service to include 1 floating support unit / place in order to ensure value for money is achieved.
  8. The hourly support cost for the service is higher than South West benchmarks. It is recommended that the service reduce this cost by delivering more support hours, this will give more time to focus work on move on strategies with service users.
  9. The communal lounge and office at Marlborough Lane are unused rooms. The review recommends that better use is made of both of these.
  10. Service users clearly value the quality of the accommodation and the location of this and are pleased with the level of service they receive from the support workers.
  11. The review recommends that the contract be renewed at the current contract value:

Supporting People Annual Contract Value                                             £22,626.81

Because of the proposal to re-commission services in the mental health sector it is recommended that this renewal be an extension to the interim contract by mutual agreement with BCHA.

     12. It is recommended that BCHA develop an action plan demonstrating how they will address the   review recommendations outlined above.

This report is a public document and will be placed on the Bath and North East Somerset Website.  Bath Self Help must share the Review recommendations and outcomes with Service Users

10. Action Plan (completed by the Provider) to address the recommendations identified above