Supporting People Service Review
Service: Marlborough Lane. Service Address: 7 Marlborough Lane,
Bath. Service ID: 49. Service Provider: Bristol Churches Housing
Association. Service Provider Address: 1-3 Surrey Street, Bristol,
BS2 8PS. National ID Number: 10017. Date: May 2005. Review Officer:
Lesley Hutchinson on behalf of Bath & NE Somerset Supporting
People Team.
1. Report
Summary
Bristol Churches Housing Association (BCHA) provides and
accommodation based floating service to people with mental ill
health from B&OME communities at 7 Marlborough Lane,
Bath. A review of this service was carried out by Lesley
Hutchinson on behalf of Bath and North East Somerset (B&NES)
Supporting People Team in May 2005.
The review found that BCHA provide a good service and makes
several recommendations for service improvements. The service is
strategically relevant to the B&NES 5 Year Supporting People
Programme though needs to ensure that a short term service is
delivered and that service user move into independent living within
a two year period. The service achieved a level B in 5 of the 6
core objectives of the QAF and was found to be value for money with
regard to unit cost but not for cost per support hour. Service user
reported they were pleased with the quality of the accommodation
and service. BCHA are commended for the amount of preparation they
put into organising the review and are particularly commended on
their resource manual.
2. Introduction to Agency
BCHA was established in 1976 and became part of the Places for
People Group in 1999. The overarching vision for the Group and the
HA is, ‘creating neighbourhoods of choice for all’ demonstrating
the commitment to look at and support the needs of diverse
communities.
BCHA is a large organisation that employs 90 staff. It directly
manages 129 units of supported housing including homeless hostels;
305 units of sheltered housing and 124 units of floating support.
It has 369 units managed by other agencies; 700 leasehold units and
1950 general need’s units. BCHAs services support approximately 558
service users at anyone time. They have Supporting People contracts
with 5 Local Authorities including all of our cross authority
partners and Wiltshire.
BCHA has maintained its autonomy though has benefited from
sharing skills, information and learning from the specialist
expertise from some of the other member of the Places for People
Group, for example through close working with New Leaf they have
developed service outcomes.
2.1 Brief History
Marlborough Lane is a large semi detached Victorian house. It is
five minutes walk from Bath city centre and is a two minute walk
from Victoria Park, its garden backs onto Charlotte Street car park
and there are three car parking spaces at the back of the
building.
The scheme has been in operation since 1994 and its primary
purpose is to provide low level housing related support to people
with mental ill health to support them to achieve and maintain
independence. The scheme is specifically from black and minority
ethnic communities and is the only service specifically for people
from B&OME communities in Bath.
When the scheme first opened tenants were given assured
tenancies, thus giving them long term security of tenure. However,
since 2002 and the introduction of Supporting People the service
aims and objectives have changed and the service now promotes
recovery and independent living. Tenants are now offered assured
shorthold tenancy agreements and are expected to move through the
service and develop independence within two years. At the point of
review 5 of the 6 service users had lived at the scheme for over 3
years and 1 person for over 11 years. The person that has lived at
the scheme for over 11 years has an assured tenancy and considers
this their home for life.
2.2 Monitoring Information
Period |
KPI 2 |
Percentage of Availability |
Percentage of Utilisation |
Percentage of Staffing Levels |
|
2003 Quarter 1 |
Not required |
100% |
100% |
85.22% |
|
2003 Quarter 2 |
Not required |
100% |
100% |
82.58% |
|
2003 Quarter 3 |
Not required |
100% |
100% |
74.47% |
|
2003 Quarter 4 |
Not required |
Not available |
Not available |
Not provided |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Quarter 1 |
Not provided |
100% |
100% |
102.53% |
|
2004 Quarter 2 |
Not provided |
100% |
100% |
95.21% |
|
2004 Quarter 3 |
100% |
100% |
97.44% |
87.50% |
KPI 2: Percentage of service users who moved on in a planned
way
The service has been operating at full availability and almost
full utilisation from the onset of Supporting People programme to
the commencement of the review. Staffing levels have been
consistently high except for 2003 quarter 3 which was caused by a
long-term staff illness and BCHA had to find appropriate cover for
this period. Key performance indicator for service users who moved
through the service for Quarter 1 and 2 of 2004 has not been
provided, these are a requirement of the ODPM and need to be
submitted.
2.3 Service Capacity and Funding
|
Service |
Units |
Support Staff |
Management Staff |
Funding |
|
Marlborough Lane |
6 |
12 Hours per week delivered by two staff |
3.5 Hours per week |
£22,626.00
(SP funding only) |
|
Overall Contract Value for Services: |
|
|
|
£22,626.81 |
Bristol Churches Housing Association work 35 hours per week and
all staff are based at the Head Office in Bristol and come to Bath
to visit the service users of the scheme.
There is no reporting of any additional monies being paid to
this service.
3. Strategic Relevance
Marlborough Lane was found to be strategically relevant to the
Supporting People Programme in B&NES. The service
provides housing related support and does not offer personal care
or general social care.
The service is designated a short term service and aims to
support people to develop independent living skills and move into
independent accommodation within 2 years, however 5 of the 6
service users have lived at the property for over three years and
one of these for over 11 years. All service users have assured
shorthold tenancies except for the service user who has lived in
the property for 11 years, they have an assured tenancy and
consider this their home for life. The figures clearly demonstrate
that BCHA are not meeting the aim of a short term service and are
not supporting people into independent accommodation in two
years.
5 of the 6 current service users had been discharged under
Section 117 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and are still subject to
the CPA approach. Where service users have been discharged under
the Act they are eligible for Supporting People funding and not
continued social services funding for housing related support
services.
The Marlborough Lane service meets some of the objectives set
out in the B&NES Supporting People Five Year Strategy
including: providing choice to service users (particularly those
from B&ME communities); inclusive planning; preventing
homelessness; crisis prevention and by tackling social exclusion.
In addition to this the Five Year Strategy identified a lack of
support services for people with mental ill health and aims to
increase services for this service user group. Given this
identified need the service is relevant to the B&NES
programme.
Overall the support being delivered in Marlborough Lane is low
level and was not found to be in conflict with the aims of housing
related support and fits with national and local strategic
guidance for this.
4. Legal / ODPM Guidance on group and type of service
In spring 2003, The Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister
asked the Social Exclusion Unit to consider what more could be done
to reduce exclusion among adults with mental health problems. The
project focused on people of working age, and asked two
questions:
- What more can be done to help adults with mental health
problems to enter and retain work?
- How can adults with mental health problems secure the same
opportunities for social participation and access to services as
the general population?
The report sets out a 27 point action plan to bring together the
work of Government departments and other organisations in a
concerted effort to challenge attitudes, enable people to fulfil
their aspirations, and significantly improve outcomes and
opportunities for this excluded group. Action falls into six
categories:
- Stigma and Discrimination – A sustained programme to try
and challenge negative attitudes and promote awareness of peoples
rights
- The role of Health and Social Care in tackling social
exclusion – implementing evidence based practice in vocational
services and enabling reintegration into the community.
- Employment – Giving people with mental health problems a
real chance of sustained paid work reflecting their skills and
experiences.
- Supporting Families and Community Participation –
enabling people to lead fulfilling lives the way they choose.
- Getting the basics right – access to decent homes,
financial advice and affordable transport.
- Making it Happen – Clear arrangements for leading this
programme and maintaining momentum.
(Mental Health and Social Exclusion, SEU Report Summary, June
2004)
The review did not identify any further ODPM specific steers for
this client group under Supporting People, so recommendations have
been drawn from above in reference to the role of Health and Social
Care, and Getting the Basics right.
There is no national steer on legacy high support services for
people with mental ill health, yet in the main this group alongside
learning disabilities represent much of the high cost individual
long term expenditure for the Supporting People programme.
Contracts can be renewed at the same level only when there is ample
evidence they are high quality and represent value for money,
though this must be within the overall limits imposed by the
strategic direction for Supporting People that decides where
housing related support fits as a funding stream and to what extent
it will contribute.
5. Quality Assessment Framework (QAF) Outcomes
The objectives were assessed as follows:
|
Core Objective |
Self Assessment |
Validated Score |
|
C1.1 Needs and Risk Assessment |
B |
B |
|
C1.2 Support Planning |
B |
B |
|
C1.3 Security, Health and Safety |
B |
B |
|
C1.4 Protection from Abuse |
B |
C |
|
C1.5 Fair Access, Diversity and Inclusion |
B |
B |
|
C1.6 Complaints |
B |
B |
The policies and procedures are clearly in place for all areas
of the QAF and were well evidenced during validation and through
interviews with the management staff, however the support staff did
not demonstrate the same in depth knowledge of these, though they
were aware of basic procedures and were committed to delivering
them. Service users were aware of the majority of the policies
except that of Protection from Abuse. There was no information
obviously available on this in the building however it was due to
be raised at the next house meeting.
The service should be commended for producing the complaints
procedure leaflet in key languages, Braille and audio tape and for
the amount of preparation and planning it put into the review. The
validation of the written policies and procedures was particularly
easy to assess because of this preparation.
6. Consultation
Staff at BCHA were interviewed as part of the review, this
included interviews with the Supported Housing Manager, Hostels
Manager, and one of the tenancy support officers. 2 of the 6
service users were interviewed (33%).
Key stakeholders interviewed including: Community Mental Health
Team, Social Services Adult Duty Team and the Homeseekers Team at
B&NES Council.
6.1 Consultation Findings
Service users at Marlborough Buildings
Both service users interviewed had lived at Marlborough Lane for
over 3 years.
- One service user felt ready to move out and was waiting for a
property to become available through the Housing Register. They had
been on the waiting list since 1999 and were hoping for a one
bedroom flat to become available through the ‘move on’ scheme. They
had recently started to receive bulletins. They had always known
that they would move out of Marlborough Lane when they were ready
and felt they no longer needed support but would like some help
when they move into their own place though thinks they will
probably get this from friends rather than BCHA staff.
- One service user liked their flat and did not want to move from
it.
- Both service users see their support worker every 3 weeks, the
meetings take place in their flats at Marlborough Lane. At these
meetings they discuss maintenance and general housing issues eg,
rent, housing benefit, letters from the LA etc and generally how
they were feeling.
- One service user had recently carried out a Risk Assessment
with their worker and stated they were now signing their Support
Plans and notes on the support they receive after each session.
They remember reviewing their support plan. Neither service user
could produce their support plan though one stated they new exactly
where it was.
- Both service users attended the house meetings which took place
every 3 or 4 months and one felt these could be more frequent as
there was no real socialising or interaction between people in the
house unless at the meetings or if there was a complaint about
noise.
- One service user wanted to be able to use the communal area and
for this to have comfortable chairs and a TV in, though understood
that there had been problems and this was why it was no longer used
and only had one chair in.
- Both service users were supported by their worker initially
when they met other support staff, eg, Psychiatrist and CPN but now
this support was not needed and they went to the meetings on their
own.
- Overall both service users felt the support service they
received was good.
- Both service users said the house was stable and that only one
person had moved out and a new person had moved in since they had
lived there.
BCHA Staff
- Referrals come to the larger BCHA team meetings and are
allocated to team members for follow up. Potential tenants are
assessed when a vacancy becomes available.
- BCHA started using Support Plans soon after Supporting People
came in however there has not been any training in this. Despite
this service provision is much better and service users are getting
used to ‘owning’ their own support plans. Reviews now take place
and dates are set in advance.
- Work in partnership and attend CPA meetings, identified clear
lines of responsibility at these meetings.
- Meetings with service users mainly take place in their own
rooms at Marlborough Buildings.
Other Stakeholders
- CMHT refer to the service when there is a vacancy and
identified a clear need for the service.
- CMHT worked in partnership with the service support workers
when the need arose, often that was at the beginning of the service
users tenancy.
- People are rarely housed through the housing register at the
scheme as places rarely become available. One LA housing worker had
not heard of the scheme before.
Homeseekers Team were aware of one person on the Assisted Move
On scheme but did not recall being contacted about
this
7. Evidence and Risk Assessment
The review of Marlborough Lane did not identify any serious
health and safety or financial risks to the present service. It
should be noted that BCHA will be accredited by an independent
consultant later in the year. The accreditation would identify any
financial concerns.
The BCHA management team and Places for People Group
demonstrated clear and accountable leadership. Policies and
procedures were all in place and there was a clear process for
training staff in these. There was a clear policy on the
‘Protection from Abuse’, however it had not been shared with
service users, though it is planned to be discussed at the next
house meeting.
The service users value the support provided, though the service
needs to encourage service users to consider their housing options
for the future rather than rely solely upon social housing.
The review found that the unfurnished and unused communal lounge
could be improved. In addition to this the onsite staff office was
also clearly unused and did not have basic facilities in it, eg,
tea and coffee. The room had recently been flooded and still smelt
of damp this was not conducive to holding meetings or writing up
service user records.
8. Value for Money
Cost per unit (to Supporting People) per
week:
£72.32
Regional Upper and Lower
Quartile:
£78.31
£215.02
(Drawn from 339 comparable services)
National Upper and Lower Quartile:
£87.52
£261.85
(Drawn from 2848 comparable services)
It should be noted that these comparitors are interim contract
values and not post review.
The unit cost falls at the lower end of both regional and
national quartiles. The review found this appropriate for provision
of housing related support.
Cost per frontline support hour (to Supporting People):
£28.00
This is a high hourly cost when compared to the draft upper and
lower benchmarks for the South West Region which is £18.92 to
£21.95
9. Review Outcome / Recommendations and Impact
- BCHA’s policies and procedures are clearly written and
regularly reviewed. Managers roll out new policies and procedures
to staff through staff meetings and supervision. Support plans have
been in place since the onset of Supporting People, however BCHA
have developed new assessment and support plan documentation and
are training staff in the use of this. Staff describe the new
documentation as an improvement and service users now ‘own’ their
support plan. Risk assessments had been recently implemented and
service users found this useful for contingency planning. Health
and safety checks are carried out each month and service users know
what to do in the event of an emergency.
- BCHA have developed a comprehensive guide to local and national
resources for the diverse needs of its service users. This resource
pack is available to staff and service users, however it would be
more accessible to service users if it were placed in the communal
lounge.
- The service has achieved level B in all areas of the QAF except
that of Protection from Abuse. BCHA is complimented for the
standard it has achieved and it is recommended that it works
towards a level A for the annual self assessment. With regard to
Protection from Abuse, although the policy is in place, service
users are not familiar with this. The policy is due to be discussed
with service users at the next house meeting. The review recommends
that the service strives for a level B in this area.
- Referrals to Marlborough Lane are assessed when there is a
vacancy at the service, consequently the service does not hold an
assessed waiting list and does not demonstrate a clear indicator of
demand for the service. Anecdotal evidence from stakeholders and
the needs mapping in the Supporting People 5 Year Strategy
identifies a lack of capacity for service users with mental ill
health, however BCHA could not demonstrate this. As the only
B&OME service in B&NES, it is recommended that BCHA develop
a method of monitoring the ongoing demand for the service.
- Support staff attend appointments and meetings with service
users and other agencies as appropriate. However there is limited
contact with local agencies that current service users are not
engaged with. It is recommended that the Support staff have a
greater presence in Bath and promote the service to the wider
B&OME community and join / attend local groups and meetings
that are relevant to the support service provided. The lack of a
presence is identified as a gap and weakness.
- Marlborough Lane is described as a short term service
however the evidence found that 5 out of 6 service user have lived
at the scheme for over 3 years. Given the lack of shortage of
mental health services in B&NES and this being the only
B&OME service it is recommended that the service falls within
the categorisation of short term and that BCHA focus on supporting
service users to find suitable independentaccommodation and do not
rely upon social housing solely. The review found no evidence of
work with the private rented sector or consideration of other move
on options and recommends that this is explored.
- It is recommended that we address the issue of the tenant that
has resided at the property for over 11 years separately – clearly
this tenant is not receiving a short term service, thus the options
are to either: a) make this service chargeable for the service
user or b) increase the capacity of the service to include 1
floating support unit / place in order to ensure value for money is
achieved.
- The hourly support cost for the service is higher than South
West benchmarks. It is recommended that the service reduce this
cost by delivering more support hours, this will give more time to
focus work on move on strategies with service users.
- The communal lounge and office at Marlborough Lane are unused
rooms. The review recommends that better use is made of both of
these.
- Service users clearly value the quality of the accommodation
and the location of this and are pleased with the level of service
they receive from the support workers.
- The review recommends that the contract be renewed at the
current contract value:
Supporting People Annual Contract
Value
£22,626.81
Because of the proposal to re-commission services in the mental
health sector it is recommended that this renewal be an extension
to the interim contract by mutual agreement with BCHA.
12. It is recommended that BCHA develop
an action plan demonstrating how they will address
the review recommendations outlined above.
This report is a public document and will be placed on the Bath
and North East Somerset Website. Bath Self Help must share
the Review recommendations and outcomes with Service Users
10. Action Plan (completed by the Provider) to address the
recommendations identified above