A to Z Index
Related Information
 
 
 
 
 
Other Websites
 
 
 
 
 

Links to external sites will open in a new browser window. Bath & North East Somerset Council is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

My Area...


Subscribe to Inform news icon

and get local news for free.

Supporting People Service Review

Service: Church Street (1), Chelscombe (2). Service Address: High Street, Weston, Bath. BA1 4BU. Service ID Number: 4 (1) 5 (2). Service Provider: Guinness Housing Association. Service Provider Address: 17 Mendy Street, High Wycombe, SP11 2NZ. National ID Number: 10000195. Date: April 2005. Review Officer: Simon Dicker on behalf of Bath & NE Somerset Supporting People Team.  

1. Report Summary

The review of the Church Street and Chelscombe sheltered housing schemes was conducted by Simon Dicker on behalf of Bath and North East Somerset (B&NES) Supporting People Team. The review found the service to be strategically relevant to B&NES Supporting People programme and value for money. The service was assessed at level C in all areas of the Quality Assessment Framework and level B for Support Planning, as laid out by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). Service users are pleased with the accommodation and the support they receive and with the response of Guinness to address the anti-social behaviour issues in the area.

Service type and capacity:

Sheltered Units (Church Street 14, Chelscombe 12)

Annual Contract Value:

Block Subsidy Contract

Max Value @ 100% Usage

Church Street £2717.82

Chelscombe £2329.56



2. Introduction to Agency

Guinness Trust Group  is a national provider of Care and Support to Older People. Schemes in Bath are managed via the Regional Office in Bristol, but a local office at Chelwood Drive supports the scheme via Housing Officers and administrators. Guinness Trust describes their aims as follows:

  •         Helping residents to retain their independence
  •         Support and/or reassurance in the event of illness or emergencies
  •         Limiting the need for resident to move as they get frailer
  •         Actively trying to reduce loneliness
  •         A responsive and effective repairs and maintenance service
  •         Freeing residents from the worries of managing and maintaining their homes.

2.1 Brief History

Church Street comprises 14 one bedroom flats just off Weston Village High Street, and Chelscombe is an adjacent scheme comprising 12 one bedroom bungalows, each with gardens. The properties are heated electrically, with recent double glazed windows. Chelscombe has residents parking, and there are a limited number of garages which tenants can apply to rent. A gardener looks after communal grassed areas

2.2 Capacity

Units:                          14 (Church St)

                                    12 (Chelscombe)

Total Units                26

Staff Hours:             0.5 x Front Line Supported Housing Officer (35 hrs per week)

2.3 Monitoring Information

Chelscombe

 

2003 Q1

2003 Q2

2003 Q3

2003 Q4

2004 Q1

2004 Q2

2004 Q3

2004 Q4

KPI 1a

100%

100%

92.86%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

SPI 1a

99.76%

99.76%

97.75%

97.06%

100%

100%

100%

100%

SPI 2a

100%

100%

100%

100%

84.32%

83.43%

97.04%

98.08%

SPI 3a

81.32%

81.32%

80.22%

84.62%

89.52%

87.07%

97.79%

86.30%

SPI 4a

100%

100%

116.67%

108.33%

84.62%

88.46%

84.62%

100%



Church Street

 

2003 Q1

2003 Q2

2003 Q3

2003 Q4

2004 Q1-3

2004 Q4

KPI 1a

100%

100%

100%

100%

Not provided

90.91%

SPI 1a

95.68%

95.68%

87.73%

99.33%

Not provided

100%

SPI 2a

100%

100%

100%

100%

Not provided

62.64%

SPI 3a

81.32%

81.32%

80.22%

84.62%

Not provided

86.30%

SPI 4a

100%

100%

128.57%

107.14%

Not provided

78.57%



NB. There are no issues of concern evident from the monitoring submissions. Availability (1a) and Utilisation (2a) are consistently high showing evidence of availability and high demand). The drop in (2a) in respect of Church Street reflects the problems in four flats discussed in the consultation section below. However there is not record of 2004 Quarter 1-3 monitoring returns for Church Street, this must be rectified.

2.4 Existing Funding

Chelscombe

Supporting People funding

Currently paying 10 units@ £3.72 each

@100% Occupancy

Adult Care funding (SSD)

£0

£0

Total Cost p.a.

£1934.40

£2321.28



Church Street

Supporting People funding

Currently paying 6 units@ £3.72 each

@100% Occupancy

Adult Care funding (SSD)

£0

£0

Total Cost p.a.

£1160.64

£2708.16


3. Strategic Relevance

There is no evidence that anything other than housing related support is being delivered to Guinness tenants from the funding in this contract.

4. Legal / ODPM Guidance on group and type of service

There is no specific guidance from ODPM for this sector.

It was noted that many of the recommendations from EROSH (The emerging role of sheltered housing) had been followed, particularly in relation to support planning.

5. Quality Assessment Framework (QAF) Outcomes

The objectives were assessed using the QAF lite as follows:

QAF Objective

Self Assessed Score

Validated Score

C1.1 Needs and Risk Assessment

C

C

C1.2 Support Planning

B

B*

C1.3 Security, Health and Safety

C

C

C1.4 Protection from Abuse

C

C

C1.5 Fair Access, Diversity and Inclusion

C

C

C1.6 Complaints

C

C



* - The score for C1.2 was validated at Level B; however the review noted that the review systems for support planning are newly introduced. The administration for this system is lengthy and would benefit from further improvement into a more concise format.

6. Consultation with Service Users

The premises were visited on 19th April, consultation was offered on a face to face basis with tenants at the nearby Church Hall.

6.1 Consultation Findings

  • All tenants spoke highly of the service provided to them by Guinness, there were no constructive criticisms or complaints in respect of the service provider during the meeting.
  • The one area of dissatisfaction voiced unanimously was the anti-social behaviour of youths in the village of Weston. In reality this was thought to be mainly caused by the same small group of people, and was exacerbated by the physical arrangement of four flats at the entrance adjoining church street. This had an archway with right of way underneath, and youths were reported to congregate here at night. Evidence of fires being lit and substantial graffiti on the walls inside the archway supported the residents’ complaints. As a result of this ongoing long term behaviour, Guinness had discussed plans with existing resident to remodel this part of the scheme, and rebuild the site as two semi detached houses, closing the right of way, and ending the physical covered space that was proving so attractive to vandalism. The present four flats that were there were no longer being offered for let, as future problems were absolutely predictable. All the tenants who joined the consultation expressed full support for these plans, although some were dismayed at uncertainty of the timescale, although they appreciated that funding and permission could not be gained without full approval of Guinness Trust Group and B&NES Local Authority.
  • Further criticism was made in regard of the Police Force, and resident strongly wished for more Police on foot patrol in the village, although others accepted that this was no longer practice in modern times.

Others criticised the families of young people in the village for not taking responsibility for the actions of their children. One resident reported his mobility scooter having been stolen and vandalised, and then when he had chained it up, superglue had been put into the padlock. There was one report of young people taking drugs and having sex in the vicinity of the scheme.

There was one previous incident of burglary in Chelscombe reported during the consultation, and all residents attending were well aware of the possibility and took steps to keep their home secure.

7. Evidence and Risk Assessment

Although the anti-social behaviour reported by residents does present a risk to the security and welfare of people in the scheme, it is notable that Guinness have responded pro-actively to concerns and had a well formed remodelling plan in place well in advance of the Supporting People review.

Although some of the behaviour reported constitutes acute nuisance behaviour, Guinness appear to be taking all reasonable steps to address it and this was recognised and supported by the tenants.

The review did not favour decommissioning the schemes because of the incidence of anti-social behaviour. Many of the sheltered units are lived in by people with a life long connection to the village, and are much valued. The scheme has an excellent location close to the village centre, has a Church Hall adjacent to it which has recently been refurbished, and will benefit considerably when the remodelling is approved.

8 Value for Money

Cost per unit (to Supporting People) per week:        £3.72

Regional Lower Quartile:                 £4.84                                                 

Regional Upper Quartile:                 £17.72                                   

(Drawn from 1527 Comparable services regionally, however these are costs for sheltered housing including those with warden support.)           

National Lower Quartile:                   £5.03                                            

National Upper Quartile:                   £16.65

                               

 (Drawn from 13590 Comparable Services Nationally, however these are costs for sheltered housing including those with warden support)

There are no strong conclusions drawn from the VFM comparators due to the reliability of comparative data, although  it would appear that these Guinness sheltered scheme costs are amongst the lowest both within Bath and NE Somerset, and throughout in the country).

9. Review Outcome / Recommendations and Impact

  1. Although the Shadow and Five Year Supporting People Strategy both indicate a small surplus of sheltered housing, the recommendations is to renew the contract for this sheltered scheme, on grounds of low unit cost and high satisfaction amongst tenants. It is also evident from the review that Guinness was well prepared and submitted timely and comprehensive QAF evidence and service statements.
  2. The system of support planning has been developed and implemented to satisfy Supporting People requirements. It is at an early stage and refinements have been made through additional procedures and documents and training has been delivered to Sheltered Housing Officers. The review recommends that these processes are streamlined to enable more concise documentation.
  3. The review recommends a further QAF submission by April 2006 at a Level B for each remaining core objective in relation to this scheme.
  4.  The review recommends that any outstanding monitoring information be presented to the Supporting People team by the 31st August 05.

10 Action Plan (completed by the Provider) to address point 1-4