Supporting People Service Review
Service: Church Street (1), Chelscombe (2). Service Address:
High Street, Weston, Bath. BA1 4BU. Service ID Number: 4 (1) 5 (2).
Service Provider: Guinness Housing Association. Service Provider
Address: 17 Mendy Street, High Wycombe, SP11 2NZ. National ID
Number: 10000195. Date: April 2005. Review Officer: Simon Dicker on
behalf of Bath & NE Somerset Supporting People
Team.
1. Report Summary
The review of the Church Street and Chelscombe sheltered housing
schemes was conducted by Simon Dicker on behalf of Bath and North
East Somerset (B&NES) Supporting People Team. The review found
the service to be strategically relevant to B&NES Supporting
People programme and value for money. The service was assessed at
level C in all areas of the Quality Assessment Framework and level
B for Support Planning, as laid out by the Office of the Deputy
Prime Minister (ODPM). Service users are pleased with the
accommodation and the support they receive and with the response of
Guinness to address the anti-social behaviour issues in the
area.
|
Service type and capacity: |
Sheltered Units (Church Street 14, Chelscombe 12) |
|
Annual Contract Value: |
Block Subsidy Contract
Max Value @ 100% Usage
Church Street £2717.82
Chelscombe £2329.56 |
2. Introduction to Agency
Guinness Trust Group is a national provider of Care and
Support to Older People. Schemes in Bath are managed via the
Regional Office in Bristol, but a local office at Chelwood Drive
supports the scheme via Housing Officers and administrators.
Guinness Trust describes their aims as follows:
- Helping residents to
retain their independence
- Support and/or
reassurance in the event of illness or emergencies
- Limiting the need
for resident to move as they get frailer
- Actively trying to
reduce loneliness
- A responsive and
effective repairs and maintenance service
- Freeing residents
from the worries of managing and maintaining their homes.
2.1 Brief History
Church Street comprises 14 one bedroom flats just off Weston
Village High Street, and Chelscombe is an adjacent scheme
comprising 12 one bedroom bungalows, each with gardens. The
properties are heated electrically, with recent double glazed
windows. Chelscombe has residents parking, and there are a limited
number of garages which tenants can apply to rent. A gardener looks
after communal grassed areas
2.2 Capacity
Units:
14 (Church St)
12 (Chelscombe)
Total Units
26
Staff Hours:
0.5 x Front Line Supported Housing Officer (35 hrs per week)
2.3 Monitoring Information
Chelscombe
|
|
2003 Q1 |
2003 Q2 |
2003 Q3 |
2003 Q4 |
2004 Q1 |
2004 Q2 |
2004 Q3 |
2004 Q4 |
|
KPI 1a |
100% |
100% |
92.86% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
SPI 1a |
99.76% |
99.76% |
97.75% |
97.06% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
SPI 2a |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
84.32% |
83.43% |
97.04% |
98.08% |
|
SPI 3a |
81.32% |
81.32% |
80.22% |
84.62% |
89.52% |
87.07% |
97.79% |
86.30% |
|
SPI 4a |
100% |
100% |
116.67% |
108.33% |
84.62% |
88.46% |
84.62% |
100% |
Church Street
|
|
2003 Q1 |
2003 Q2 |
2003 Q3 |
2003 Q4 |
2004 Q1-3 |
2004 Q4 |
|
KPI 1a |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Not provided |
90.91% |
|
SPI 1a |
95.68% |
95.68% |
87.73% |
99.33% |
Not provided |
100% |
|
SPI 2a |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Not provided |
62.64% |
|
SPI 3a |
81.32% |
81.32% |
80.22% |
84.62% |
Not provided |
86.30% |
|
SPI 4a |
100% |
100% |
128.57% |
107.14% |
Not provided |
78.57% |
NB. There are no issues of concern evident from the monitoring
submissions. Availability (1a) and Utilisation (2a) are
consistently high showing evidence of availability and high
demand). The drop in (2a) in respect of Church Street reflects the
problems in four flats discussed in the consultation section below.
However there is not record of 2004 Quarter 1-3 monitoring returns
for Church Street, this must be rectified.
2.4 Existing Funding
Chelscombe
|
Supporting People funding |
Currently paying 10 units@ £3.72 each |
@100% Occupancy |
|
Adult Care funding (SSD) |
£0 |
£0 |
|
Total Cost p.a. |
£1934.40 |
£2321.28 |
Church Street
|
Supporting People funding |
Currently paying 6 units@ £3.72 each |
@100% Occupancy |
|
Adult Care funding (SSD) |
£0 |
£0 |
|
Total Cost p.a. |
£1160.64 |
£2708.16 |
3. Strategic Relevance
There is no evidence that anything other than housing related
support is being delivered to Guinness tenants from the funding in
this contract.
4. Legal / ODPM Guidance on group and type of service
There is no specific guidance from ODPM for this sector.
It was noted that many of the recommendations from EROSH (The
emerging role of sheltered housing) had been followed, particularly
in relation to support planning.
5. Quality Assessment Framework (QAF) Outcomes
The objectives were assessed using the QAF lite as follows:
|
QAF Objective |
Self Assessed Score |
Validated Score |
|
C1.1 Needs and Risk Assessment |
C |
C |
|
C1.2 Support Planning |
B |
B* |
|
C1.3 Security, Health and Safety |
C |
C |
|
C1.4 Protection from Abuse |
C |
C |
|
C1.5 Fair Access, Diversity and Inclusion |
C |
C |
|
C1.6 Complaints |
C |
C |
* - The score for C1.2 was validated at Level B; however the
review noted that the review systems for support planning are newly
introduced. The administration for this system is lengthy and would
benefit from further improvement into a more concise
format.
6. Consultation with Service Users
The premises were visited on 19th April, consultation was
offered on a face to face basis with tenants at the nearby Church
Hall.
6.1 Consultation Findings
- All tenants spoke highly of the service provided to them by
Guinness, there were no constructive criticisms or complaints in
respect of the service provider during the meeting.
- The one area of dissatisfaction voiced unanimously was the
anti-social behaviour of youths in the village of Weston. In
reality this was thought to be mainly caused by the same small
group of people, and was exacerbated by the physical arrangement of
four flats at the entrance adjoining church street. This had an
archway with right of way underneath, and youths were reported to
congregate here at night. Evidence of fires being lit and
substantial graffiti on the walls inside the archway supported the
residents’ complaints. As a result of this ongoing long term
behaviour, Guinness had discussed plans with existing resident to
remodel this part of the scheme, and rebuild the site as two semi
detached houses, closing the right of way, and ending the physical
covered space that was proving so attractive to vandalism. The
present four flats that were there were no longer being offered for
let, as future problems were absolutely predictable. All the
tenants who joined the consultation expressed full support for
these plans, although some were dismayed at uncertainty of the
timescale, although they appreciated that funding and permission
could not be gained without full approval of Guinness Trust Group
and B&NES Local Authority.
- Further criticism was made in regard of the Police Force, and
resident strongly wished for more Police on foot patrol in the
village, although others accepted that this was no longer practice
in modern times.
Others criticised the families of young people in the village
for not taking responsibility for the actions of their children.
One resident reported his mobility scooter having been stolen and
vandalised, and then when he had chained it up, superglue had been
put into the padlock. There was one report of young people taking
drugs and having sex in the vicinity of the scheme.
There was one previous incident of burglary in Chelscombe
reported during the consultation, and all residents attending were
well aware of the possibility and took steps to keep their home
secure.
7. Evidence and Risk Assessment
Although the anti-social behaviour reported by residents does
present a risk to the security and welfare of people in the scheme,
it is notable that Guinness have responded pro-actively to concerns
and had a well formed remodelling plan in place well in advance of
the Supporting People review.
Although some of the behaviour reported constitutes acute
nuisance behaviour, Guinness appear to be taking all reasonable
steps to address it and this was recognised and supported by the
tenants.
The review did not favour decommissioning the schemes because of
the incidence of anti-social behaviour. Many of the sheltered units
are lived in by people with a life long connection to the village,
and are much valued. The scheme has an excellent location close to
the village centre, has a Church Hall adjacent to it which has
recently been refurbished, and will benefit considerably when the
remodelling is approved.
8 Value for Money
Cost per unit (to Supporting People) per
week: £3.72
Regional Lower Quartile:
£4.84
Regional Upper
Quartile:
£17.72
(Drawn from 1527 Comparable services regionally, however these
are costs for sheltered housing including those with warden
support.)
National Lower Quartile:
£5.03
National Upper
Quartile:
£16.65
(Drawn from 13590 Comparable Services Nationally, however
these are costs for sheltered housing including those with warden
support)
There are no strong conclusions drawn from the VFM comparators
due to the reliability of comparative data, although it would
appear that these Guinness sheltered scheme costs are amongst the
lowest both within Bath and NE Somerset, and throughout in the
country).
9. Review Outcome / Recommendations and Impact
- Although the Shadow and Five Year Supporting People Strategy
both indicate a small surplus of sheltered housing, the
recommendations is to renew the contract for this sheltered scheme,
on grounds of low unit cost and high satisfaction amongst tenants.
It is also evident from the review that Guinness was well prepared
and submitted timely and comprehensive QAF evidence and service
statements.
- The system of support planning has been developed and
implemented to satisfy Supporting People requirements. It is at an
early stage and refinements have been made through additional
procedures and documents and training has been delivered to
Sheltered Housing Officers. The review recommends that these
processes are streamlined to enable more concise
documentation.
- The review recommends a further QAF submission by April 2006 at
a Level B for each remaining core objective in relation to this
scheme.
- The review recommends that any outstanding monitoring
information be presented to the Supporting People team by the 31st
August 05.
10 Action Plan (completed by the Provider) to address point
1-4